Fact Check: Did BJP Really Help Azamgarh Get Rid of Its Terror Tag?

Contrary to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s claim, more than other parties, it is the BJP and its leaders who have been responsible for giving Azamgarh a bad name. 

On Thursday, while addressing an election rally in Azamgarh in Uttar Pradesh, Prime Minister Narendra Modi claimed: “Azamgarh was linked to terror until 2014; BJP removed the tag”.

According to a report published by Indian Express, Modi said, “You should remember how these people played with the prestige of Azamgarh. Whenever there was a terror attack, agencies used to reach Azamgarh during their investigation. Why did this happen?”

In September 2008, after an alleged encounter in Batla House of Jamia Nagar in Delhi, two young men from Azamgarh and one police inspector of Delhi Police were killed. Later, several Muslim youth were arrested from the district for their alleged role in terror activities, and it was alleged that they were members of terror outfits.

Over the years, this town in eastern UP became synonymous with terror, so much so that people began to refer to it as ‘Atankgarh, a nursery of terror’.

This, in turn, led to a lot of victimisation of locals. 

All this happened when Bahujan Samaj Party supremo Mayawati was chief minister and continued even when Akhilesh Yadav took on the mantle. During their rule, they hardly took any concrete steps to dispel the propaganda about the town despite the fact it has been a stronghold of Samajwadi Party and BSP for years.

In 2014, it was one of the few seats won by the SP, represented by Mulayam Singh Yadav, where he defeated then siting MP Ramkant Yadav of the BJP. Currently, Akhilesh Yadav is the mahagathbandhan’s candidate against BJP’s Dinesh Lal Yadav ‘Nirahua’, a popular Bhojpuri actor.

By all accounts, Akhilesh Yadav has a clear edge, which will be voting on Sunday as part of sixth phase of the general elections. 

Also read: Akhilesh Yadav to Contest Lok Sabha Polls From Azamgarh, Mulayam From Mainpuri

As far as the claim made by Modi is concerned, it is far from the truth that his party removed the terror tag from Azamgarh. In reality, the town still carries the tag – dozens of Muslim youth are still languishing in jails for years as undertrials in terror cases.

What is even more important to note is that, contrary to the claims made by Modi, he and his party have done their part share in defaming the town and vilifying its residents, especially its Muslims. 

Sample this. In September 2008, a few days after the alleged encounter and the subsequent arrests – which included some students of Jamia Millia Islamia – when legal help was extended by the university, Modi, who was then Gujarat chief minster, during a rally called the move akin to protecting terrorists.

Referring to the initiative taken by the then vice chancellor of Jamia Mushirul Hasan, Modi had said: “One university in Delhi, Jamia Milia University, has publicly announced that it will protect these terrorists and will fund their case in the court. Doob maro (go drown yourselves), the university is running on this country’s money and they have the audacity to hire lawyers to release these terrorists”. 

Moreover, during the December 2008 Delhi assembly elections, the party put out an advisement in newspapers and elsewhere with the title “Jamia University funds to defend terror accused”. This, despite the fact that the then VC has made it clear time and again that it is not true. The party was reprimanded the Election commission.

The commission, in its notice, noted , “The Vice Chancellor of the Jamia University has categorically stated that no fund of the institute was being used for the alleged purpose and that the students of the University were themselves raising funds.”

But despite the EC also stepping in, the vilification campaign did not stop.

In fact, in 2014, ahead of the Lok Sabha elections, BJP senior leader, V.K. Malhotra said, “Jamia, Batla safe houses for terrorists”.

UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath addresses and election rally in the presence of actor Dinesh Lal Yadav and BJP candidate from Lalganj Neelam Sonkar in Azamgarh district on May 9, 2019. Credit: PTI

Similarly, firebrand Hindutva leader and current UP CM Yogi Adityanath has a long history of calling the town a terror hub which dates back to the late 1980s, when the leader is reported to have made his first visit.

Over the years, he and members of the Hindu Yuva Vahini have used provocative slogan ‘Azamgarh shuruaat karega, UP Gujarat banega (The process of UP becoming Gujarat will be started from Azamgarh)’.

In fact, late last month, while addressing a rally in Azamgarh, Adityanath said: “Once Azamgarh was known in the field of education and literature but the Samajwadi Party turned it into a stronghold of terrorism.”

The CM alleged that “the SP and the BSP through mischievous means” made Azamgarh “a fortress of terror and crime to defame it and we have come to pull it out of it”. He further claimed that they have crime in their DNA and “that is why they support cases like the Batla House (encounter case)”.

Commenting on the claim made by the PM, Masihuddin Sanjari, a local resident and activist told The Wire: “It is true that in the last few years fear and suspicion have decreased but that’s not because the BJP or Modi government have anything for us. It has happened because the propaganda has been exposed by the civil society and human rights organisations.”

Sanjari further said that it is ridiculous that BJP and its leaders are making such claims because more than other parties, it is “the BJP that has been responsible for giving Azamgarh a bad name”.   

Photo Essay: Batla House Beyond 2008

Yes, Batla House is a ghetto, but it is so much more than just that.

Yes, Batla House is a ghetto. But it is also so much more than that.

A morning scene from Bhatla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

A morning scene from Batla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

The cityscape is made up of countless neighbourhoods which share physical proximity but are separated along countless lines. How do we differentiate one neighbourhood from another? What makes some spaces the ‘dark underbelly’ while some the ‘poster images’ of a city? Questions like these had kept me awake in my hometown in Kannur, but more so, when I moved to Delhi a year ago.

I had only heard of Batla House through a report in a Malayalam local newspaper. I was a high school student and I remember feeling a tinge of fear after reading the stories about the encounter. Living in Kerala, it somehow felt alien to me at that time. Little did I know that this ‘alien’ neighbourhood would one day become an integral part of my life.

Having just enrolled in Jamia Millia Islamia for my post graduation, my friends and I decided to search for an apartment to stay. It was no coincidence that we found one in Batla House. Getting used to a new city was a painful process and everywhere I went, I felt like an unwelcomed guest. My perception of this neighbourhood too was no different from what the mainstream media had propagated. The long, twisting curves of the congested road somehow resembled a dark snake. The rickshaws, the autos and the cars were like the scales on its skin, each glued to the other. I feared that someday all of it would ram into each other. But to my relief, everything managed to co-exist in orderly chaos.

Slowly, the flashes of the media reports of the 2008 encounter began fading away and I saw Batla House for what it was, instead of how it had been depicted for years. I saw many faces of Muslim men and women whose dressing and appearances were, explicitly or implicitly, being made the signifiers of terror in the mainstream narrative. One of my friends confided that she also experienced a sense of strange discomfort when she saw men with bearded faces. I was baffled to hear these words from an otherwise open-minded person. During my interaction with people who had lived in Delhi, I found that many felt that the area was unsafe to live in, some even saying that they felt a sense of ‘threat’.

My experience has been completely different. Like any other neighbourhood, I found that Batla House was brimming with aspirations and life. Women dressed in fashionable attire and colourful headscarves, parties on the roads with DJs playing upbeat music is a common sight. It was very much a microcosm of an urban India.

My longing for an alternative narrative compelled me to photograph Batla House. While roaming around in its lanes with my lens pointed at the people, I initially faced many challenges. I wasn’t sure about how they would react to the intrusion of a camera. I was welcomed with both distressed and delighted faces. It took me weeks to earn their trust but gradually, people began opening their homes to me.

We are still not sure about what transpired nine years ago but the incident has resulted in the alienation of the people of Batla House. Many people shudder when asked to recollect the horrific incident of September 19, 2008. Media reportage of the incident provided a feast of sensationalised news which was devoured by many. Even today, little efforts have been made to present a counter-narrative of the encounter.

While people in adjoining posh localities of New Friends Colony and Lajpat Nagar choose to view Batla House with suspicion, its residents have become victims of misrepresentation and stereotyping. I realised that every gali of Batla House had an interesting story to tell. Yes, Batla House is a ghetto. But it is also so much more than that.

Police vans seen patrolling Bhatla House on a busy evening. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath

Police vans seen patrolling Batla House on a busy evening. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

The street is always bustling with children and shoppers. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

The street is always bustling with children and shoppers. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Newspapers being decked for distribution in Batla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Newspapers being decked for distribution in Batla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Rooftops are a common spot where women to get together. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

34-year old Aisha is visited by her friend in her residence at Batla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

34-year old Aisha is visited by her friend in her residence at Batla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Bumper to bumper traffic is a daily occurrence in Bhatla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Bumper to bumper traffic is a daily occurrence in Batla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Young residents of Bhatla House dance at a wedding party as DJ Shaffique's music plays on Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Young residents of Bhatla House dance at a wedding party as DJ Shaffique’s music plays on Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

A family spending a quiet evening inside their home in Batla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

A family spending a quiet evening inside their home in Batla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

An NGO conducts Quran classes in Bhatla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

An NGO conducts Quran classes in Batla House. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Young women who are wait for their friends to join them. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Young women who are wait for their friends to join them. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Security forces stationed at Batla House market. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Security forces stationed at Batla House market. Credit: Nabeela Paniyath/The Wire

Nabeela Paniyath is a freelance journalist and a student of MA Convergent Journalism at Jamia Millia Islamia.