The man broke the window grill of the ward he was in, used his clothes and a bed sheet to make a make-shift rope, using it to climb out of the window and escape.
Meerut: A 65-year-old Nepali man who had tested positive for the coronavirus infection in Baghpat, escaped at around 1 am on Tuesday morning from the hospital where he had been kept in isolation. He broke the window grill of the ward he was in, used his clothes and a bed sheet to make a make-shift rope, using it to climb out of the window and escape.
The hospital administration and police personnel only found out in the morning that the patient had escaped. A search operation, which included 10 teams of the administration and the Uttar Pradesh police, began to locate the man. Calls were also made to village pradhans and block officers in the area.
The Baghpat police also issued an appeal with the man’s picture to the people in the area to help find the COVID-19 patient. “He has fled while he was treating (sic). Whoever he meets will contract the life threatening coronavirus. That is why it is very important to find him and to treat him,” the appeal said.
He was finally found in a brick kiln near Baghpat at around 1 pm on Tuesday. “Our appeals to the people worked. We received a tip from a local that he has been seen around 3 kilometres from the hospital. We immediately went there and found him,” said inspector general of police (Meerut range) Praveen Kumar.
A team of the health department also accompanied the police and brought him back to the hospital. The administration has now said that it will tighten security outside all hospitals. Earlier, two patients had also fled from Azamgarh and Sultanpur in the state.
The 65-year-old who had fled in Baghpat had attended the Tablighi Jamaat meet in Delhi, according to the district administration. He was among a group of 17 who were in Rataul, close to Baghpat city, after the Tablighi Jamaat meet. They were tested on April 1 and only the 65-year-old tested positive. He was then quarantined in the Baghpat hospital.
According to Baghpat chief medical officer R.K. Tandon, the patient is so far asymptomatic. “I am surprised that he did this because he had no symptoms and he was also very well behaved. Did not give anyone any trouble before this,” he said.
Around 30% of the people who have been found to be infected with the new coronavirus in India were either at the Tablighi Jamaat event or when in contact with someone who was. The gathering which took place in Delhi between March 13 and 15 was attended by over 8,000 people
This also has to be seen in the context of sampling bias that has emerged once the Jamaat event came to light. While in most parts of the country, only those who display symptoms of COVID-19 are being tested, all those who were present at the Nizamuddin event are being tested. Thus, several patients with no symptoms – like the 65-year-old who escaped from Baghpat – are being detected, while that is not happening for the population that did not attend the Jamaat event, thereby skewing the percentage.
So far in Uttar Pradesh, 314 people have tested positive for COVID-19. Of these, 168 are linked to the Tablighi Jamaat event. According to reports, 37 of the state’s 75 districts have reported at least one infected patient and 61,500 people are under quarantine. The state has so far tested 6,073 samples, or 0.003% of its over 20 crore population.
Protesters who had been holding a sit-in since Tuesday alleged that the police used force to evict them early on Wednesday.
New Delhi: In the latest instance of crackdown against anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) protesters in the state, the Uttar Pradesh police on Wednesday arrested 19 people for sedition, including a minor, in Azamgarh. The police have registered a case under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and named 35 persons in the FIR.
According to a statement released by the local police, the protesters were allegedly raising slogans against the government and nation. The police further claimed that “they were saying they will snatch azadi and will get azadi anyhow. They were making hateful announcements against the Hindu religion. They were abusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi and UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath.”
The protesters, who had been holding a sit-in against the CAA and NRC at Jauhar Park in the Kasimganj area of Biliryagaj, Azamgarh since Tuesday, have alleged that the police used force to evict them early in the morning on Wednesday. According to the Indian Express, when the women protesters questioned the police action, they were pelted with stones.
“The men and boys were caught and arrested. After that, we were lathicharged. Some women have sustained injuries,” claimed a 45-year-old woman protester while speaking to the newspaper. “All through this, police used communal slurs and all kinds of abuses,” claimed the woman, who refused to be identified, fearing a backlash.
“They used all their force to remove us from the protest site and when we did not give up, they caught the men and started beating them,” Yasmeen Khan, a protester told The Quint, adding “then, they pelted bricks and stones on us before resorting to lathicharge. This left many women injured.”
According to an eye-witness Hafiz Danish Falahi, a woman sustained serious injuries on her head and is reportedly in critical condition. The witness also said that children were injured in the chaos.
The district police have denied the allegations and claimed that women and children were “put at the front and were holding stones and lathis” and it was “part of a conspiracy”. The police also denied that they had conducted a lathi-charge but acknowledged that tear gas was used against protesters. Bilariyaganj Station Officer (SHO), Manoj Kumar Singh, said “six-seven tear gas shells were used on Wednesday morning. There was no lathi-charge”.
Meanwhile, there was heavy police deployment in the area and most shops have been shut. According to the Indian Express, protesters have alleged that police had filled the park with water to “stop them from holding a peaceful protest”. Most locals the newspaper spoke to said that the entire neighbourhood was living in fear of the police. “We are scared because the police have named so many people and can pick up anyone. They have invoked such serious charges against the protesters,” a shopkeeper told the newspaper, requesting anonymity.
According to the report, Sarwari Bano, the woman who had to undergo a surgery Wednesday after she was hit by a stone at the protest site has regained consciousness. “She is stable now. She has a clot on her brain because of the injury to her head and hence, we had to operate on her. The operation went well and she might be discharged soon,” said Dr Mohammad Arif, a staff employee at the private hospital in Azamgarh, where she has been hospitalised.
The minor arrested and booked for sedition and other charges, works as a cleaner in a dhaba. As per the news report, the family of the boy claimed that his date of birth is March 1, 2004. “We told the policemen that he is not 18. They did not listen to us and said that he is a rioter and will go to jail…He works as a cleaner at a dhaba and was on his way to work when he was picked up by police around 6:30 am on Wednesday,” his brother told the Indian Express.
Asked by the newspaper if the family has visited the boy in jail, his brother said, “No, we haven’t. Police told us that we can’t meet him yet. We will try again on Friday. We don’t have his birth certificate. We are uneducated and poor and keeping documents is not a priority for us. We did not see this day coming.”
Bilariyaganj SHO Manoj Kumar Singh said that the court will decide whether the boy is minor or not. “For us, he is a rioter. He was arrested from the spot and was sent to jail on Wednesday. It is up to the court to decide whether he is a minor or an adult,” Singh told the Indian Express on Thursday.
Santosh Jaiswal was arrested on charges of extortion and obstructing public servants from discharging their duty.
Azamgarh: The Azamgarh district magistrate on Monday ordered a probe into the arrest of a journalist allegedly after he took photographs of some children mopping the floor in their school.
Journalist Santosh Jaiswal was arrested on false charges of extortion and obstructing public servants from discharging their duty, alleged a fellow journalist Sudhir Singh, who, along with another journalist, requested district magistrate N.P. Singh to apprise him of the alleged illegal arrest.
“No injustice will be meted out to the journalist. We will look into the matter,” said Singh. The district magistrate also ordered a probe into the matter.
Local journalist Santosh Jaiswal was arrested here last week on Friday after he took photographs of school children, mopping the floor and called up the police to apprise them of the illegal practice by the school authorities, said Sudhir Singh.
Sudhir Singh said the police, responding to Jaiswal’s call, reached the school and took both the journalist and principal Radhey Shyam Yadav of the Oodpur primary school to the police station.
At the Phoolpur police station, the school principal lodged a complaint against Jaiswal based on which an FIR was registered against him and he was arrested, said Sudhir Singh.
The FIR No 237 registered on September 6, 2019, against the journalist quotes the school principal as saying that Jaiswal often visited the school and misbehaved with both male and female teachers and students and persuaded them to subscribe to the newspaper published by him.
In the FIR, Yadav said on the day of the incident, Jaiswal came to the school and ordered some school children to mop the floor to facilitate him to take their photographs.
At this, Yadav said, he objected to his act, following which he fled the school premises leaving his vehicle there and later demanded money from him.
Sudhir Singh, who also met the Azamgarh district magistrate along with other journalists to complain against Jaiswal’s arrest, refuted the charges against the arrested journalist.
This is the latest in a series of actions taken against journalists in Uttar Pradesh for doing their job. The state government has been accused of trying to intimidate the press. In another case, an FIR was registered against a journalist after he broke a story of school children being served only rice and salt as part of the mid-day meal.
The Mirzapur district magistrate accused Pawan Jaiswal of participating in a conspiracy to defame the Uttar Pradesh government. “When you are a print journalist, you could have clicked a picture. Why did you record a video,” DM Anurag Patel asked in a video.
“This is not how a story is done. If he is a print journalist, he should have taken a picture and published a story. But he was recording a video and telling people to come and be a part of the video. That is why we feel that he is also part of the conspiracy,” Patel said.
At a stock-taking meeting in New Delhi on Monday, BSP chief Mayawati reportedly decided that her party will be contesting the upcoming by-polls in 11 assembly seats of Uttar Pradesh alone.
New Delhi: The electoral alliance between the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party appears to be have come to an end.
At a stock-taking meeting with the campaign coordinators in New Delhi on Monday, BSP chief Mayawati reportedly decided that her party will be contesting the upcoming by-polls in 11 assembly seats of Uttar Pradesh alone.
Although the BSP has not declared the end of the alliance formally, Mayawati’s decision to contest by polls indicate the same as her party has conventionally stayed away from contesting by-polls.
The coming together of the two arch-rivals was seen as a game changer in Uttar Pradesh. Even so, the BJP decisively trumped the alliance by winning 63 out of the 80 seats. The saffron party changed the political equation by increasing its vote share from around 43% in 2014 to around 50% in 2019.
In contrast, the mahagathbandhan, which was expected to gain from the alliance of the two rivals secured only around 39%.
The BSP could win only 10 – a big gain from the 2014 elections in which it had failed to even open its account – while the SP secured only five victories, including those of party chief Akhilesh Yadav and his father Mulayam Singh Yadav.
Mulaya Singh Yadav and Akhilesh Yadav. Credit: PTI
Last year, the Ambedkarite party had decided to support Samajwadi Party candidates in the parliamentary by-polls of Gorakhpur, Phulpur, and Kairana. The victory of all three candidates against the BJP led to the eventual pre-poll alliance between the two parties for the 2019 general elections.
Popularly known as ‘mahagathbandhan, the alliance was seen as voicing the concerns of a large section of OBCs, Dalits and Muslims. However, the decisive results in favour of the saffron party have foregrounded the historical differences between the two parties again.
According to sources in the BSP, Mayawati took the decision to contest the by-polls alone after campaign coordinators pointed out that although the BSP cadre, comprising a large section of Dalits, were transferred wholeheartedly to SP candidates, the reverse did not happen.
“Yadav votes (SP’s constituency) were not transferred to the BSP in many seats. This means that the SP could not consolidate its own base. The alliance with SP turned out to be useless for the BSP,” Mohammad Faisal, a former journalist who has covered UP extensively, told The Wire.
This, BSP’s campaign co-ordinators reportedly said, was the principal reason behind the defeat of many BSP and SP candidates.
“Even Akhilesh’s family members could not win the support of all Yadavs. His wife Dimple Yadav, cousins Dharmendra Yadav and Akshay Yadav also lost. In all these seats, Shivpal Yadav’s party polled a substantial number of votes. Only the Yadavs could have voted for Shivpal.”
According to what the BSP party workers said in the meeting, Dimple, Dharmendra, and Akshay Yadav, who contested from Kannauj, Badaun, and Firozabad respectively, trailed in assembly segments that were Yadav-majority seats and were considered SP strongholds.
Mulayam Singh, who won the Mainpuri Lok Sabha seat, trailed by a huge margin in the Bhongaon assembly seat – considered to be Mulayam’s pocket borough. The same was the case in many assembly segments which were Yadav-dominated areas.
Mayawati felt that the candidates floated by Shivpal Yadav, Akhilesh uncle who rebelled last year, and the Congress, damaged the mahagathbandhan’s chances further. She is also believed to have said that the SP could win its five seats only because of the support of Dalits and Muslims.
Apart from Mulayam from Mainpuri and Akhilesh from Azamgarh, SP won from Rampur (Azam Khan), Sambhal (Shafiqur Rehman Barq), and Moradabad (S.T. Hasan).
The 1995 UP guest house incident, in which Mayawati was assaulted by SP workers, was also a topic of discussion at the Monday meeting. According to a BSP worker, Mayawati said that although she would never forgive the SP for the incident, she had put the bitterness behind because of the Akhilesh, who she praised for getting the two parties together.
Despite this, she felt that the alliance with SP did not bring in enough advantage for the party, which is why it was decided that BSP would go it alone in the by-polls.
However, sources in the SP said that the logic that the the party couldn’t consolidate Yadavs along expected lines is misleading. “Most Yadavs voted for the gathbandhan. Shivpal Yadav’s party had negligible vote share (less than 1%),” a SP leader said.
The leader contended that the alliance could not get the support of communities other than Yadavs, Jatavs, and Muslims while the BJP consolidated a number of smaller communities under the saffron umbrella.
Rajan Pandey, a close observer of UP politics, told The Wire: “The reasoning BSP is using to break the alliance can also be used against it. The SP can now say that the split in Dalit votes led to the defeat of many gathbandhan candidates. That BSP did not receive much support from Dalit groups apart from the Jatavs has already been established in many post-poll analyses.”
Contrary to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s claim, more than other parties, it is the BJP and its leaders who have been responsible for giving Azamgarh a bad name.
On Thursday, while addressing an election rally in Azamgarh in Uttar Pradesh, Prime Minister Narendra Modi claimed: “Azamgarh was linked to terror until 2014; BJP removed the tag”.
According to a report published by Indian Express, Modi said, “You should remember how these people played with the prestige of Azamgarh. Whenever there was a terror attack, agencies used to reach Azamgarh during their investigation. Why did this happen?”
In September 2008, after an alleged encounter in Batla House of Jamia Nagar in Delhi, two young men from Azamgarh and one police inspector of Delhi Police were killed. Later, several Muslim youth were arrested from the district for their alleged role in terror activities, and it was alleged that they were members of terror outfits.
Over the years, this town in eastern UP became synonymous with terror, so much so that people began to refer to it as ‘Atankgarh, a nursery of terror’.
This, in turn, led to a lot of victimisationof locals.
All this happened when Bahujan Samaj Party supremo Mayawati was chief minister and continued even when Akhilesh Yadav took on the mantle. During their rule, they hardly took any concrete steps to dispel the propaganda about the town despite the fact it has been a stronghold of Samajwadi Party and BSP for years.
In 2014, it was one of the few seats won by the SP, represented by Mulayam Singh Yadav, where he defeated then siting MP Ramkant Yadav of the BJP. Currently, Akhilesh Yadav is the mahagathbandhan’s candidate against BJP’s Dinesh Lal Yadav ‘Nirahua’, a popular Bhojpuri actor.
By all accounts, Akhilesh Yadav has a clear edge, which will be voting on Sunday as part of sixth phase of the general elections.
As far as the claim made by Modi is concerned, it is far from the truth that his party removed the terror tag from Azamgarh. In reality, the town still carries the tag – dozens of Muslim youth are still languishing in jails for years as undertrials in terror cases.
What is even more important to note is that, contrary to the claims made by Modi, he and his party have done their part share in defaming the town and vilifying its residents, especially its Muslims.
Sample this. In September 2008, a few days after the alleged encounter and the subsequent arrests – which included some students of Jamia Millia Islamia – when legal help was extended by the university, Modi, who was then Gujarat chief minster, during a rally called the move akin to protecting terrorists.
Referring to the initiative taken by the then vice chancellor of Jamia Mushirul Hasan, Modi had said: “One university in Delhi, Jamia Milia University, has publicly announced that it will protect these terrorists and will fund their case in the court. Doob maro (go drown yourselves), the university is running on this country’s money and they have the audacity to hire lawyers to release these terrorists”.
Moreover, during the December 2008 Delhi assembly elections, the party put out an advisement in newspapers and elsewhere with the title “Jamia University funds to defend terror accused”. This, despite the fact that the then VC has made it clear time and again that it is not true. The party was reprimanded the Election commission.
The commission, in its notice, noted , “The Vice Chancellor of the Jamia University has categorically stated that no fund of the institute was being used for the alleged purpose and that the students of the University were themselves raising funds.”
But despite the EC also stepping in, the vilification campaign did not stop.
In fact, in 2014, ahead of the Lok Sabha elections, BJP senior leader, V.K. Malhotra said, “Jamia, Batla safe houses for terrorists”.
UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath addresses and election rally in the presence of actor Dinesh Lal Yadav and BJP candidate from Lalganj Neelam Sonkar in Azamgarh district on May 9, 2019. Credit: PTI
Similarly, firebrand Hindutva leader and current UP CM Yogi Adityanath has a long history of calling the town a terror hub which dates back to the late 1980s, when the leader is reported to have made his first visit.
Over the years, he and members of the Hindu Yuva Vahini have used provocative slogan ‘Azamgarh shuruaat karega, UP Gujarat banega (The process of UP becoming Gujarat will be started from Azamgarh)’.
In fact, late last month, while addressing a rally in Azamgarh, Adityanath said: “Once Azamgarh was known in the field of education and literature but the Samajwadi Party turned it into a stronghold of terrorism.”
The CM alleged that “the SP and the BSP through mischievous means” made Azamgarh “a fortress of terror and crime to defame it and we have come to pull it out of it”. He further claimed that they have crime in their DNA and “that is why they support cases like the Batla House (encounter case)”.
Commenting on the claim made by the PM, Masihuddin Sanjari, a local resident and activist told The Wire: “It is true that in the last few years fear and suspicion have decreased but that’s not because the BJP or Modi government have anything for us. It has happened because the propaganda has been exposed by the civil society and human rights organisations.”
Sanjari further said that it is ridiculous that BJP and its leaders are making such claims because more than other parties, it is “the BJP that has been responsible for giving Azamgarh a bad name”.
After attempts to instigate communal clashes all over eastern Uttar Pradesh, the Adityanath government is using the draconian law to target Muslims, even as Hindutva activists involved in the violence get off lightly.
Lucknow: On March 4, 2018, a year after the Bharatiya Janata Party came to power on the plank of improving law and order in Uttar Pradesh, chief minister Adityanath claimed that not a single incident of communal violence had taken place in the state since he took over.
Ten days later, the Union home ministry tabled statistics in parliament which showed that Uttar Pradesh continues to top the list of states in terms of the number of incidents of communal violence and related deaths – 44 people were killed and 540 injured in UP in 2017. This compares poorly with 29 deaths and injuries to 490 people in 2016, and 22 deaths and 410 injuries the previous year. The incidents of communal violence in places like Bulandshahr and Saharanpur clearly showed the involvement of the Adityanath-led Hindu Yuva Vahini and local BJP activists. Those involved were reprimanded but strict legal action against the culprits did not follow.
On January 16, 2018, the Adityanath government issued a press statement in which it said the UP police had invoked the National Security Act (NSA) against 160 people in order to control law and order. This was one of their prized achievements, apart from racking up 1200 police encounters in 10 months. The most prominent of the NSA detentus is of course Bhim Army founder Chandrashekar Azad, who has been lodged in jail since May 2017.
In popular parlance, the NSA is known as a law in which there is ‘no vakil, no appeal, no daleel’ (no lawyer, no appeal, no argument).’ The Act, whose stated purpose is “to provide for preventive detention in certain cases and for matters connected therewith,” came into force on September 23, 1980. It empowers the Central and state governments to detain a person to prevent him/her from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of India, the relations of India with foreign countries, the maintenance of public order, or the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community. The maximum period of detention is 12 months. The order can also be made by the district magistrate or a commissioner of police under their respective jurisdictions, but the detention must be reported to the state government along with the grounds on which the order has been made.
Under the Act, a person can be detained for up to 10 days without being informed about the reasons for the detention. The government is allowed to withhold the information supporting the detention in ‘public interest.’ A detained person is not permitted to question his/her accusers or the evidence in support of their detention. Nor are they allowed a lawyer in this period. A three-person advisory board made up of high court judges or persons qualified to be high court judges determines the legitimacy of any order made for longer than three months. If approved, a person may be held extra-judicially for up to 12 months.
Successive governments have made free use of the NSA and at any one time, Uttar Pradesh is usually among the top five states in terms of the numbers arrested under it.
The Wire met the families of 15 people detained under the NSA in the past one year from four districts of eastern Uttar Pradesh known as Poorvanchal; all the arrests were made after incidents of communal clashes. Even when there were allegations of the clear involvement of Hindu chauvinist groups like Hindu Yuva Vahini, Hindu Samaj Party and Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha, those put behind bars were invariably Muslim. All the accused were first granted bail by the sessions court and as soon as they got bail, re-arrested by the police under the NSA. Locals believe that just as the 2014 elections were preceded by a large number of minor communal clashes which polarised voters, these clashes and selective detentions under the NSA are part of the Sangh parivar’s preparation for the 2019 general elections.
Kanpur: Two clashes, but NSA only for the Muslims
In response to media reports critical of religious celebrations inside UP police stations, Adityanath said on August 19, 2017, “If I cannot stop namaz on the road, I have no right to stop Janmashtami at a police station.”
In fact, when reports of hooliganism by kanwariyas through their loudspeakers, DJ and road shows was pointed out, he said, this was a yatra of Shiv devotee and not a “shav yatra” (funeral procession). By introducing religious sentiments in the maintenance of law and order, the chief minister clearly indicated that religious celebrations are above the rulebook.
Thousands of our readers believe that free and independent news can be a public-funded endeavour. SupportThe Wire and join them.
When Muharram last year fell on October 1, bang in the middle of the period for the Hindu ritual of the immersion of Durga idols, intelligence units across the country flagged the possibility of communal tension since both observances involve street processions. West Bengal chief minister Mamta Banerjee prohibited the immersion of Durga idols on October 1 and requested people to do it between October 2 and October 4. The West Bengal government faced heavy criticism from the BJP. However, no incidence of violence happened in the state. In Uttar Pradesh, on the other hand, inspired by the CM’s call for unabashed public displays of religious sentiment on the streets, nine districts – Kanpur, Ballia, Pilibhit, Gonda, Ambedkar Nagar, Sambhal, Allahabad, Kaushambi and Kushinagar – witnessed communal tension and violence on October 1 due to the two religious processions.
On October 1, Kanpur witnessed two major religious clashes. One was at the Rawatpura, where a Ram Baraat – a wedding procession for Lord Ram – organized by the Ram Lalla committee of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad came in the way of a Tazia procession, a representation of the tombs of Hassan and Hussain. Local Intelligence Units had earlier alerted the administration in Lucknow about the possibility of clashes but no preventive measures were taken. As a result, there was a clash that led to stone pelting, air shots that left several injured including two policemen. Several people from the Ram Lalla committee were detained and later let off.
On the same day, a Moharram procession in Juhi Param Purwa, a ghetto, was stopped at the intersection of the locality by Hindu Samaj Party members leading a Durga idol immersion procession. There was firing and stone pelting here too. Juhi Param Purwa is a small locality, primarily dominated by Muslim and Dalits. On one side of the intersection live the Muslims and on the other side live Dalits. In the violence here, a police vehicle, and the only shop and a house owned by a Muslim on the Dalit side was torched. The police arrived on the spot and by that evening 57 people were detained. Most were released, except Hakim Khan, Farkun Siddiqui and Mohammad Salim, who were slapped with the National Security Act one month after their arrest – as soon as they were granted bail by the local court.
In the ten months since the three have been behind bars, Hakim’s daughter was born, Farkun’s daughter had to leave school because of the stigma of being a criminal’s daughter and Salim’s children have been tossed around from one relative’s house to the other
Hakim’s wife, daughter and mother in Kanpur. Credit: Neha Dixit
Hakim Khan, 35, worked with the Sahara group as an insurance agent and has been part of several peace and communal harmony initiatives in the area. On October 1, when the Tazia procession was stopped, he had stepped in to broker peace between the two sides and returned home after the police arrived on the spot. “He would participate in temple festivities, food camps on Tuesdays for Lord Hanuman and even mop the temple stairs,” says Ram Prakash, his neighbour. He was picked up by the police in the early hours of October 2 from his house. “He was thrashed with belts and the police also said to him ‘You say Islam zindabad a lot, isn’t it?’” says Mohammed Kasim, his elder brother.
Farkun’s wife, Sophia, holds up his photograph. Credit: Neha Dixit
After Farkun Siddiqui’s arrest, his 12-year-old daughter faced jibes at school. Her teacher called her ‘the daughter of a criminal.’ Her classmates would regularly tell her, ‘Muslims are terrorists.’ Fed up of the daily reprimands, she stopped going to school mid-way through the academic year. Last month, she took admission in another school and is repeating her class. “He worked as a contractor for the municipal corporation for years. An income tax payer is suddenly a threat to national security and has been behind bars for 10 months now. Tell me how to interpret it if it’s not religious discrimination?” asks Sophia, Farkun’s wife, who says all their savings will soon be exhausted.
In Kanpur, Mansoor tent house set on fire. CreditL Special Arrangement
Mansoor Tent house was the only shop owned by a Muslim on the Dalit side of the locality. It was owned by Salim, also known as Pappu. His house was adjacent to the shop. “We have lived there for several years and there has never been a threat in the past on the basis of our religion,” says Ruki, his wife. On the day when the violence broke out, first his shop was set on fire and then his house. “There were lots of people in the Durga idol procession that I had never seen before. They were the ones who first started ransacking the shop and then set the shop and the house ablaze,” she says. Her two young children had fainted during this three-hour long ordeal before they were rescued by relatives. Her 12-year old son, Babbu, says, “There were two-three from the neighbourhood too. Take me to the police, I will identify them all.” Strangely, Mohammad Salim was arrested by the police despite his house and shop being set on fire and his family stranded on the streets. Two days after this incident, the Maa Durga tent house was inaugurated just next to Salim’s shop with a temple on the pavement right in front. Since Salim’s arrest, the family has been living at various relative’s houses with no means of income.
Salim’s wife, Ruki Begum , in Kanpur. Credit: Neha Dixit
Even though the BJP won the last general and assembly elections comfortably, party representation in civic local bodies across Uttar Pradesh remains a sore point. In the December 2017 civic polls too, it received only 29% of the votes.
These civic polls were held just two months after Moharram in several cities including Kanpur in 2017. Hakim was planning to contest the elections from Juhi ward, the constituency in which Param Purwa is located. “Had he contested the elections, he would have definitely won” owing to Hakim’s popularity both among Hindus and Muslims, says Ram Prakash.
“If this is not an act of prejudice by the police, what is? Why was no one from the Hindu Samaj Party been arrested? Why was a person who is equally loved and respected by both communities targeted?” asks Mohammad Kasim.
The Hindu Samaj Party, an offshoot of the Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha, notorious for fanning communal sentiments, was part of the Durga idol procession on the fateful day. “By setting Mansoor Tent house on fire, they sent out a loud message – to root out Muslims and their means of livelihood. By setting up Maa Durga Tent house next to it two days later, the message was that economic survival is possible only through communalism,” says Rajiv Yadav, an activist from Rihai Manch, an advocacy group. The fact that no one from the Hindu Samaj Party was arrested for this incident demonstrates the prejudiced nature of the police proceedings. “The idea is that Hindus have a free hand and will get away with anything and Muslims will be put behind bars,” says Rajiv.
Shakeel Ahmed Bundela, a lawyer in the Kanpur district court points out that in the Rawatpura violence, most of the people detained by the police were from the Ramlalla committee. He says, “Both the incidents happened on the same day. In fact, in Rawatpura, the police was grievously injured. How come NSA was not imposed on the Vishwa Hindu Parishad members in that incident and only on these guys here? This disparity needs serious investigation.”
Just Rs 7 per day from readers like you will keep The Wire going. Click here for more details.
Tazia politics is not new in Kanpur. Every year, there are tensions and protests across the city. The difference between now and then is that this time it has been used not just to foster divisions between Hindu and Muslim but also to divide locals on Dalit vs Muslim lines to win an election. Not surprisingly, BJP candidate Rakesh Kumar Paswan from the Pasi caste of the Dalit community won from the Juhi ward two months later in December, 2017 owing to the Dalit Muslim divide created by the October 1 incident.
Ram Bahadur, a local priest in a temple in Param Purwa says, “There is a saying in Kanpur, ‘Ama, mathadhishi band karo (Please stop being a religious head)’ The mathadhish causes trouble, divides people for political gains. I guess, we really need to repeat it every passing day now.”
Before taking his oath as chief minister, Yogi Adityanath was a mathadhish – head of the Gorakhnath Math in Gorakhpur.
Bahraich: Pitting Dalits against the Muslims
“Have you heard of Zarina Begum? She was the last royal court singer of Awadh,” says Basheer Ahmed, a local resident in his 70s. “She was Begum Akhtar’s disciple and known for the baithak style thumris. She died just two months back in Lucknow in extreme penury. She was the pride of Nanpara, Bahraich,” he declares as he starts playing a clip on his smart phone. An old woman with a harmonium sings, “Nazar laagi raja tore bangle pe… (I am looking towards your palace, o king…),” she sings longingly. “An eye has been cast on Nanpara too,” he says. “But it is an evil one”.
Bahraich is among the 250 most backward districts of India with low socio-economic and basic amenities indicators and Nanpara is a small town in the district. It is located just 16 km from the Indo-Nepal border, surrounded by dense forests. Due to its proximity to the border, it has strategic economic importance in the area.
In August 2015, a year after the Modi-led BJP government came into power at the Centre, the religion-wise 2011 census data was released. The data was used for propaganda by Hindutva groups to spread the myth that the Hindu population is on a decline and that Muslims were adding to their population as a form of Islamist jihad. Groups like the RSS, VHP and Bajrang Dal started campaigns like ‘Ghar Wapsi’, a program to convert non-Hindus and bring them back to the Hindu fold. Yogi Adityanath had also claimed that ‘ghar wapsi’ will continue till conversion to all religions is banned. There were reports that claimed Nanpara has seen an astronomical rise in the number of Muslims, comprising of 70% of the total town population. Since then, Sangh activists refer to Nanpara as the ‘jihad by population project’, as Bahraich zone Bajrang Dal president Manish Gupta, told this reporter.
Pilgrims getting ready for the journey to the mazhar of Ghazi Miyan in Bahraich. Credit: Vipin Patel/YouTube
Bahraich also has a large Dalit population and the Lok Sabha constituency is a reserved seat for SC candidates. In the run up to the 2017 UP assembly elections, the BJP and RSS had also started making concerted efforts to start representing Dalit icons as Hindu figures in order to polarise votes on communal lines. One of the booklets distributed by the Sangh contained a story titled “The Badshah and the Raja,” about an 11th century battle near what is now Bahraich. The battle pitted a Muslim king, Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masud, against Suheldev, a chieftain who many believe was a Pasi. Currently, the Pasis form the second-largest Scheduled Caste group in Uttar Pradesh, after Jatavs. According to the booklet, Masud invaded India early in the second millennium, and waged an aggressive campaign till he encountered Suheldev. Ahead of the battle, Masud decided to place a herd of cows at the head of his army, aiming to disrupt any attack by his Hindu opponent, who considered the animals sacred. But, the legend goes, Suheldev and his army freed the cows under the cover of night, and saved them. The booklet states that Suheldev then went on to kill Masud – a claim that some historians have challenged. Harbans Mukhia told The Wire, “There is written evidence that he finally couldn’t stop Masud’s army from advancing further into UP.”
The booklet praised Suheldev and called on readers to protest against the Urs, or death anniversary celebration, of Masud, held every May at his dargah in Bahraich. These efforts were aimed at creating divisions between Dalits and Muslims. In the 2017 UP assembly elections, the BJP won six out of the seven assembly seats from here. Savitri Bai Phule, a 33-year-old Dalit BJP candidate who identifies herself as a ‘sadhvi’ (monk) is the elected MP.
“What do you think? When so many concerted efforts are made by the Sangh, there will be no impact on the people in Nanpara who are already struggling with unemployment and hunger?” asks Basheer.
On the morning of December 2, 2017, close to 300 people took out a Barawafat procession in Gurgutta village of Nanpara. Barwafat is celebrated by Muslims as the birth anniversary of Prophet Mohammed. Culturally, Uttar Pradesh has had a history of Muslims and Hindus both participating in these processions. Since the Yogi government came into power, the festival has been removed from the list of government holidays in the state.
Aqeela with her daughters in Bahraich. Credit: Neha Dixit
“It was 10-11 in the morning and it is true that the procession did deviate from the designated route. As soon as it reached the village intersection, there was stone pelting by members of the Hindu Samaj Party and Bajrang Dal from the other side. There were a couple of rounds fired in the air that led to commotion.” Bystanders say that there was religious sloganeering from both sides. A couple of roadside kiosks were damaged. The police arrived along with the Seema Suraksha Bal (SSB) and the situation was brought under control. Between that day and the next, altogether 38 people were held from all over the village. “In the name of controlling the tensions, the SSB took away our poultry and goats. Some even asked us to cook them for the SSB to eat,” says Kanhaiya, a local resident. Finally, nine people were arrested and charged under the Prevention of Atrocities against SC/ST Act. Eventually, the nine were granted bail but soon after, five of them were slapped with the National Security Act. All of them were Muslims.
Munna, a brick kiln worker, Aslam, a bangle seller, Masood Raza, a madrassa teacher, Noor Hasan, a rickshaw puller and Arshad, a student have been in jail for the past nine months under the NSA.
There were six potatoes boiling in turmeric and salt water on a mud stove outside the small room with a broken, thatched grass roof on the day I visited Aquila Bano and her seven daughters. This was to be their dinner. Her husband, Noor Hasan, in his early 40s, worked as a rickshaw puller in Delhi. He earned Rs 200-300 per day and came home every three months. He was one of those who was picked up by the police on December 2. “He was on his way back from a doctor’s clinic. He had taken our sick child for treatment. But he had to return because the clinic was shut due to the Barawafat tension,” says Aquila. Since his arrest, with no other financial support, Aquila, in her mid-30s and illiterate, has been working as a farm labourer, earning Rs 120 per day. Till date, different lawyers have relieved her of Rs 35,000 on the pretext of helping her to get Noor Hasan released. “This is money I have taken on loan from several places. I don’t know how I will repay it,” she says. With no money to travel, the family has not met Noor Hasan – who is lodged in Bahraich jail – for months.
Sammo with her family in Bahraich.Inset: Her husband’s bangle shop. Credit: Neha Dixit
It had only been an hour since Aslam had opened his bangle shop on the day of the procession when tensions escalated. Looking at how the adjacent kiosks were being destroyed by a frenzied mob, he stayed at the shop to protect it. “He had just bought a new stock of bangles,” says Sammo, his 30-year-old wife. “The police picked him up from the shop itself,” she says. Aslam, 35, had rented the shop and would make up to Rs 4,000 a month. Sammo works as a farm labourer too to feed her six children. “Seven small size burnt rotis is all he gets in the prison. He has not had a stomach full of food in these nine months,” she says. She too has paid Rs 40,000 to a lawyer for Aslam’s release with no real updates on the review of the NSA charges against him.
“All the rich people got away. And the poor were detained under NSA. The police has just been collecting bribes. Testing and stretching till the point people keep paying. Then, they release those who pay the most,” says Ram Niwas, a local tea stall owner.
Saifuneesa with her daughter. Credit: Neha Dixit
Similarly, Maqsood Raza, 32, also earned Rs 4,000 as a madrassa teacher and was picked up by the police. His two-year-old daughter has been ailing for the past few months and the family has no money for treatment. “I have run from office to office. I will have to go to my parents’ house since there is no money to survive,” says Saifuneesa, his wife.
Mohammad Munna, also the same age as Maqsood, worked at a brick kiln in Nepal. His job was to take mud bricks to the kiln for cooking and that earned him Rs 5,000 per month. “His sons have stopped their education and started working as daily wagers to feed the family,” says Abdul Khalid, his younger brother.
Eighteen-year-old Mohd Arshad was a student at a madrassa in Kozhikode in Kerala and had come to visit his parents after six months just a day before the incident. “He was part of the procession and came home as soon as the procession got violent. “The fact that he was getting educated was seen as a threat by those who are trying to polarise people,” says Shama, his mother. She says that Arshad has become depressive in prison. “He says, if I stay here more, I will go mad or I will kill myself,” she says.
“Last year, someone tied a pig at the local mosque during Ramzan. We acted wisely and did not aggravate tensions. We kept quiet and complained to the police. We don’t want a riot here. But they are hell bent,” says Maulana Akbar. The village locals are of the view that these clashes are being manufactured for larger electoral gains. His neighbor Ram Kishen says, “In our village, Muslims participated in Dussehra, Ramlila, Durga Pooja and Holi and Hindus were part of Barawafat and kept taziyas in Muharram. Since the Sanghi propaganda about growing Muslim population started, they have been trying break our unity, the Dalit-Muslim unity.”
There is a saying in Bahraich that the root of curry masala is onion. “Sangh is the onion that needs uprooting here to get rid of the communal masala and restore the peace and sanity of our village,” says Basheer Ahmed.
§
Barabanki: Turning a tradition of syncretism into an object of division
Every Holi, Dewa Sharif, the white shrine of Sufi Saint Haji Waris Ali Shah in Barabanki district turns red, yellow, red, pink, purple and all the colours that could be imagined. Waris Ali Shah was a 19th century saint and the founder of the Warsi sect of Sufism. He believed that all religions are based on love and affection. His followers were Hindus, Muslims, Christians and Sikhs and were allowed to stay in their own religion. To mark this tolerance, he started the tradition of celebrating Holi at the shrine every year, which has continued for over a century.
On April 27, 2017, just a month after Yogi Adityanath led BJP government came into power, UP cabinet minister Rajendra Pratap Singh claimed that the previous Samajwadi Party-led government provided electricity to the ‘Muslim’ shrine Dewa Sharif but not to the Hindu Lodheshwar Mahadev temple in the same district. Both places of worships were given a communal identity despite their secular traditions.
Lodheshwar temple calls. Credit: Neha Dixit
Lodheshwar Mahadev temple is an hour away from Dewa Sharif on the banks of Ghagra river in Mahadeva village of Ramnagar tehsil, Barabanki. It is believed that the Pandavas from the Mahabharata performed a yagya for Lord Shiva here. A well by the name of Pandav Kup exists and the water is considered holy. The temple is also known for its syncretic culture. For centuries, shops outside the temple premises selling offerings, material required for rituals, crafts, crockery, utensils, toys have been owned and run by both Hindus and Muslims. In fact, the two annual fairs held at this temple, one on the occasion of Shivratri in the month of March-April and the other a cattle fair in the month of October-November, are a major contributor to the village’s economy. Both Hindus and Muslims participate with equal enthusiasm. In the past, the presiding priests of the temple have been instrumental in ensuring communal harmony.
Barabanki’s ‘Chhota Yogi”: Adityanath Tiwari
The temple management has a curious method of designating the chief priest. Every four years, the contract for the presiding rights over Lodheshwar is handed over by the temple trust to the top bidder. It is widely believed that this is the method adopted by most temple managements in North India. Last year, Mahant Adityanath Tiwari, who in his late 30s and fashions himself after Yogi Adityanath, was handed over the contract for Rs five lakhs. Since then, he has been constructing a temple complex dedicated to several Hindu deities on the lines of the Gorakhnath math presided over by Yogi Adityanath. He has also started a construction material enterprise called ‘Shiva traders’ just next to the under-construction temple complex.
On November 26, 2017, while campaigning for local body elections, chief minister Adityanath also promoted sectarian division by using electricity distribution to Dewa Sharif as a poll issue. Dewa, he said, ‘got electricity 24×7, Mahadeva got none. We will change this.’ Mahant Adityanath Tiwari was also a contestant in the same elections for the post of the village pradhan. As part of his election campaign, he started a drive to get rid of the loudspeakers from a mosque which has stood next to the temple for 200 years. Inspite of stirring divisive sentiments, the duo did not reap benefits and ‘Chota Yogi’ lost the elections to Jaan Mohammed, a Muslim candidate, by 122 votes.
Four months later, on March 14, 2018, at noon, an idol procession led by Shiv Bhagwan Shukla, a member of Hindu Yuva Vahini – the youth militia founded by Adityanath – entered Mahadeva village from the neighbouring Surajpur village with at least a hundred participants on tractors and bikes. They were taking the idol of Laddoo Gopal to the Lodheshwar temple for blessings. According to eyewitnesses, young intoxicated men indulged in loud sloganeering and created a ruckus. On a jammed road, some men on a tractor used sexually explicit language and threw gulaal – the coloured powder used as part of Holi celebrarions – on a 13-year-old school girl riding pillion with her brother, Shah Fahad. When Shah Fahad objected to the sexual harassment, more people came in support. The heated conversation soon turned violent.
Meanwhile, a false rumour was spread that the Laddoo Gopal idol was tossed around by Muslims and thrown away. This escalated tensions in the neighbouring areas. Within minutes, the incident was given a communal colour and the local police arrived.
The same evening, police from Ramnagar police station registered an FIR on the basis of a complaint by Shiv Bhagwan Shukla claiming that a Muslim mob with roughly 40 people attacked the idol procession and started robbing ‘Hindu’ girls and women of their jewellery and injured 12 people. The police did not mention the sexual harassment of Shah Fahad’s sister that triggered the incident. An FIR was filed against 12 Muslims under serious charges and against 40-45 unknown people. All the witnesses in the police’s complaint are members of the local Hindu Yuva Vahini unit. The next morning, 12 people were arrested and sent off to Barabanki jail. No FIR was filed and no arrests were made against any of the outsiders who was part of the idol procession. Five days later, all 12 were granted bail. As soon as the 12 reached court, four of them, Rizwan, Zubair, Ateek and Mumtaz were told that they would be detained under the National Security Act.
Rizwan’s parents, Barabanki. Credit: Nexa Dixit
Rizwan, 25 and Mumtaz, 35, worked as ‘bisati walas.’ This is a common term used for street hawkers who sell imitation jewellery, toys, clothes and housekeeping items in villages. Both ran their own shops outside the Lodheshwar temple. At the time of the arrest, Rizwan’s father, who ran a cycle repair shop, suffered a paralytic stroke. His other brother, Taj, who was incapacitated because of polio in his childhood is now running the shop. “There is no means of livelihood. The entire family was dependent on him,” says Shakeela, his mother. The Ramnagar police station’s report to to the police superintendent describes Rizwan as ‘Yeh nihayat dabang, hinsak evam uttejak pravrati ka vyakti hai’ (He is extremely dominant, violent and aggressive) as an explanation for why he should be detained under the NSA.
Mumtaz’s family has no money to repair the thatched roof of their home. Aleema, his wife says, “I have been giving wheat flour in boiled water to my one-year old daughter as a substitute for milk. There is no money to eat or buy milk. We can’t even afford to meet him in jail.” Her other five daughters, all between the age group of five to 12, work in neighbouring houses for food.
Barabanki Mumtaz’s family. Credit: Neha Dixit
Zubair, 40, and Ateek, 25, worked at local tent houses. Salma, Zubair’s wife has moved to her parents’ house for lack of two square meals. Habib Ahmed, his father says, “They have now imposed restrictions on meeting him in jail. I was recently told that not more than two meetings in a month are allowed.”
Ateek, is the uncle of the girl who was harassed that day. His father, Basheer, says, “Even the police has denied Chota Yogi’s theory that the idol was touched or tossed around by Muslims. The problem is that this mahant is not from our area. He came from Hardoi and settled here a few months back and brought communal poison coupled with his own political ambition. Since then, he has been disrespecting our secular unity, our Ganga Jamuni culture. And that’s what the Hindu Yuva Vahini units are doing in east UP.” ‘Ganga Jamuni’ is a term used for the culture in the plains of North India which is a fusion of Hindu and Muslim elements. “I want to ask these people, have they forgotten how a Muslim tailor has been serving Ramlalla in Ayodhya for years? Have we not served the Mahadeva by taking care of the thousands of kanwars that come to Pandav kup for centuries?” adds Basheer.
Chota Yogi has now started a campaign to oust all Muslim shop owners from outside the temple complex. “They are giving Rizwan and Mumtaz’s example of how Muslims are a threat to national security. This is also a way to economically weaken working class Muslims in the area,” says Shakeela, Rizwan’s mother.
There are also growing voices among the Hindu Yuva Vahini and Hindu Samaj Party units backed by Chota Yogi to get rid of the 200-year-old Jama Masjid made by Raja Jehagirabad that stands next to the temple. “The argument is that the temple has existed since the time of Mahabharat and the mosque is just 200 years old made with an intention to overshadow the temple,” adds Shakeela.
Locals believe that electoral politics is disturbing the fabric of the village. Shakeela says, “First, they tried to divide people in the civic polls. That didn’t work and Chota Yogi lost. They arrested Muslims. Now in the run up to the 2019 elections, they want to get rid of the mosque. Can’t the police see that? Or is that too much to expect?”
§
Azamgarh – When technology and social media meet communal politics
‘Jahan aadmi, wahan Azmi’ (Wherever there is a human being, there is an Azmi). This is a common saying in north India throwing light on the large-scale migration from Azamgarh that started almost a hundred years back and is still prevalent.
Sarai Mir, a small town in Azamgarh district on the Azamgarh-Lucknow highway, is known for three things – Abu Salem, a convicted gangster, Abu Azmi, a Samajwadi Party politician and laung lata, a sweet dipped in sugar syrup.
In popular culture, it is called Chhota Dubai since a large number of households have at least one member in the Gulf for work. It is said that the people of Sarai Mir have been migrating for work since World War II. Many went to Myanmar in the 1930s as traders and labourers and came back with better financial status. The average quality of life here is better compared to other parts of Azamgarh but it still does not have quality higher education colleges, industrial units or other employment opportunities to stop the migration.
According to the 2011 census data, Muslims constitute 52% of Sarai Mir’s population. The people of the town are wary of both the media and politicians. “It has been 10 years since the Batla House police encounter in Delhi on September 19, 2008 but the media and the politicians still keep labelling this place as a terror factory,” says Shah Alam, a local resident. The two students, Atif Ameen and Mohammed Sajid were shot dead in the encounter and Zeeshan, the one arrested by the police in the Batla House incident, are all from this area. The Batla House encounter was debated, heavily contested by human rights activists and lawyers. The authenticity of the incident is mired with complicated questions till date. In fact, in 2016, the police claimed that Mohammed Sajid did not die in the encounter but fled and later joined ISIS. This is also heavily debated since the police could not provide any proof. In the last one-year, the UP police and Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) has made several arrests of Muslim youths from Azamgarh, Kanpur and other parts of UP as part of their official ‘deradicalisation project. Since then, Azamgarh and Sarai Mir have dealt with the stigma associated with them.
Within a month of the Yogi Adityanath-led BJP government coming to power in Uttar Pradesh in February, 2017, five people were arrested from various parts of the state for making derogatory remarks on social media about the chief minister. A year after that, on April 24, 2017, Amit Sahu, a 20-year-old man from Sarai Mir, allegedly wrote a derogatory Facebook post about Prophet Mohammed and Islam. Amit is a member of the Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha. He was also part of the Bajrang Dal earlier.
The Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha has been especially active in Uttar Pradesh since 2014. It also operates with different names in several areas, including Hindu Samaj Party. Its president, Kamlesh Tiwari had made objectionable comments about Prophet Mohammed on December 2, 2015. He was arrested and charged under the National Security Act after protests from across the country in February, 2016. He was set free by the Allahabad High Court six months later. Since then, he has been arrested several times and released – for inflammatory remarks and for inciting kar seva at the disputed Ram mandir in Ayodhya.
On April 27, after protests from locals, a complaint was filed at the Sarai Mir police station against Sahu. The police filed the FIR under section 295A and 66A of the IT Act and sent him to jail. (Curiously, 66A of the IT Act was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2015 itself)
Dissatisfied with the police proceedings, the next day, on April 28, close to 300 protestors gathered outside the police station to demand imposition of the National Security Act on Sahu. The members of Hindu Samaj Party also arrived on the spot and started sloganeering against the protestors. Circle officer Ravi Shankar Prasad, SDM Vagish Kumar Shukla and the police asked the protestors to back off. As a result, there was stone pelting. The police charged with batons and fired tear gas to disperse the crowd. A police vehicle was also destroyed in the violence. The police accused 34 people of the violence and arrested 18. None of them were from the Hindu Samaj Party. On May 8, when those arrested were granted bail by the sessions court, three of them were slapped with National Security Act. They were Asif, Raquib and Sharib.
Support journalism that is unafraid to ask the right questions. Just Rs 7 per day from readers like you will keep The Wire going.
All young boys and men near Raquib’s house have funky hairstyles. Fohawk, pompadour, floppy quaff with streaks of brown, burgundy and what not. Of course, they don’t know the names of their hairstyle but they know how they want their hair now because of Raquib. His father passed away 15 years back. He along with his other five brothers was raised by his mother, Salma Bano, who did odd jobs to make a living. In the last few years, Raquib emerged as a competent barber and hairstylist locally. First, he opened his salon in a small rented shop and within two years saved enough money to buy a wooden kiosk to shift his salon there. “He was self-taught. While watching films, all he would notice was the hairstyles of various actors and then practice it on neighbours, cousins, nephews – whoever he could get hold off,” says Danish, his nephew.
On the day of the incident, he was still at the shop. “When violence broke out, he shut the kiosk and came home for lunch thinking that in a few hours things would calm down,” says Salma Bano. He was picked up from his home by the police. She has now been running from police station to lawyers and had spent close to two lakh rupees by mortgaging her only patch of land. “We don’t know how to get by any longer. We have even sent his wife back to her parents’ house since there is no way to ensure two square meals here,” she says.
Iftekhar Ahmed, Asif’s father, in Azamgarh.
Asif, a 23-year-old tailor had worked in Malaysia earlier and for the past two years had set up shop in Sarai Mir. Magazine and newspaper cuttings of clothes designs neatly adorned his shop for women to choose their style. April was the busiest month, just before Eid. He had received numerous orders to stitch clothes for women for Eid. At about 6.30 in the evening on April 28, the police not only arrested him but also seized all the clothes, stitched and unstitched from his shop. “They have not been returned till date,” says Iftekar Ahmed, his father. After a pause, he says, “The police did not even return his new mobile phone, the one he saved money for over years and bought for Rs 12,000.”
At the time of the arrest, Asif’s son was only three months old. “What I don’t understand is that if he was one of the people throwing stones, why was he still sitting in his shop threading needles and cutting cloth at the time of the arrest? He was an easy target for the police. They did not arrest the Hindu Samaj members who are on the run. Only they can explain if they were biased or under political pressure,” he says.
Anjum, Hasan Sharib’s mother.
Sharib, a 24-year-old farmer, got married just 20 days before his arrest. “By selectively arresting these young boys under the NSA who are just starting off their lives, the police and administration is trying to convey that young Muslims will always remain second class citizens. How come Amit Sahu is out on bail and these boys are not?” says Shahid, Sharib’s father. He says that Hindu Samaj Party members have been spreading rumours that Sarai Mir Muslims are emulating ‘Kashmiri stone pelters who support terrorists.’
Many believe that the violence – and the free hand to the Hindu Samaj Party – has a connection with the upcoming 2019 elections. “The idea is that if you instigate a riot in Azamgarh, there will be trouble in the entire Poorvanchal belt. And Sarai Mir, with a notorious reputation created by the media, is an easy starting point,” says Tarique Alam, a local activist.
National security for whom?
When the National Security Act was introduced in 1980 by Indira Gandhi, she assured legislators that the law would only be used against black marketeers and smugglers. However, the first few arrests made were that of trade unionists. People were detained not for their actions but for criticising the government, for participating in public meetings, for giving a call for non-cooperation with the government, for demanding the payment of arrears, as in the case of the Dalli-Rajahara incident, for appealing against a five days’ salary cut by the government in Assam.
Ravi Nair of the South Asian Human Rights Documentation Centre, which has done extensive research on the NSA, says, “Preventive detention is bad in law. India is one of the few countries that uses laws like this. It is mostly used by dictatorships. Even quasi-democratic countries review preventive detention laws in parliament every few years. India doesn’t do that.”
An SAHRDC internal review of habeas corpus petitions showed that the police often rely on the NSA when they are unwilling or unable to make an appropriate criminal case under the strictures of constitutional and statutory law. It found that there is a regular pattern of using preventive detention, for instance, to address the current activities of repeated offenders and organised crime; to bypass a trial when witnesses were unwilling to testify; and to prevent release on bail. Essentially, the police appear to regularly use preventive detention in more difficult criminal law cases when inefficiency or ineptitude might make its task difficult.
Says Nair, “Most catch-all laws like the NSA do not follow any due process. The only clause that has not been ratified till date since the introduction of the law is that the advisory board review NSA cases should have judicial officers. Right now, the advisory boards only have revenue officers who have no training in the judiciary or the law.”
In the normal course of criminal law, a person accused of a crime is guaranteed the right to legal counsel, the right to be informed of charges as soon as possible, to appear before a magistrate within 24 hours, to cross-examine any witnesses and question any evidence presented and to be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. The NSA, however, does not apply any of these rights to preventive detention cases. It permits the extra-judicial detention of individuals if the government is subjectively “satisfied” that an individual is a threat to foreign relations, national security, India’s defence, state security, public order, or the maintenance of essential supplies and services. This is convenient for the government and police because it allows them to escape the strictures of the Criminal Procedure Code and the courts of the land.
Since the NSA does not allow lawyers for the accused, adequate representation of their cases becomes a major hurdle. Shakeel Ahmed says, “What happens to those accused who are illiterate? How are they going to present their case with the required technical and legal evidence before the advisory board?”
The record shows that advisory boards are reluctant to act against the state and set aside orders of detention, primarily on the ground that it is the executive that is best positioned to assess threats to public order. Evidently, the advisory board has not released anyone in UP till date of its own volition.
Nair says that according to his research, most people arrested under NSA are poor. “There have been several NSA cases in Bihar, Telangana and Orissa where NSA has been used mostly against tribals or the vulnerable. These are people who have no access to the advisory committees because of lack of resources. And state legal aid such as those in Uttar Pradesh are nonexistent.”
Rajiv Yadav of the Rihai Mqnch is of the opinion that the recent NSA detentions in Uttar Pradesh and the opaque criteria for release is partisan in nature. “How come BJP members Sangeet Som and suresh Rana, accused in the Muzaffarnagar riots, were released within a few months of their detention under NSA? And how come working class Muslims who have had no criminal past are still under detention?”
Supreme Court lawyer Indira Jaisingh is of the opinion that misuse is built into the structure of the National Security Act. She says, “Under this Act, there is incarceration without informing the accused despite no criminal case against them. It is a clear violation of the right to life and liberty. This kind of law is prone to be used as a political tool and not as a law.”
The misuse of the law and the dereliction of responsibility by the police in the eastern UP cases reported above is evident from the fact that the police has relied on FIRs filed by complainants from the Hindu Samaj Party, Hindu Yuva Vahini and locals. As a rule, the police must file a separate FIR detailing its own account but that has been given a miss in all the four incidents above. Yadav says this has been done so that that the “Hindu nationalists are protected.”
Police response
Praveen Kumar, DIG (law and order), UP police, denies the charge. He says, “We do not discriminate between Hindus and Muslims. All the arrests are individual in nature against people who are disturbing the peace and harmony of the area.”
Responding to the unprecedented increase in the number of NSA cases in one year in UP, he says, “Actually, if you look at the last 10 years, the number is not so high. It has only increased by 10 to 15%. The crime rate in UP is very high, which is why in cases of communal clashes, disturbances or in cases of fake currency, we have empowered the district magistrates to impose NSA.”
Since the National Crime Records Bureau does not publish data on NSA detentions, it is impossible to use official data for an actual year-on-year calculation.
Asked why only Muslim working-class people have been detained despite the involvement of the Hindu Yuva Vahini and Hindu Samaj Party, he said, “I do not have details of specific districts and incidents but we are not acting against specific castes or communities.”
Supreme Court lawyer, Rebecca John says, “Preventive detention has now become ‘political and social detention’ and it has institutionalised the arbitrary use of state power to detain without trial those citizens who are seen as ‘inconvenient’ to the political establishment.”
In the 15 cases above, all of them were slapped with NSA as soon as they got bail from the sessions court. The same pattern in evident in Chandrashekar’s case and also in the Kasganj case where three brothers were arrested. Yadav argues, “It is important to note that the court is granting them bail on the same charges as the ones the police is using against them to slap NSA. The court is granting bail so that the accused can take their fight to the judiciary and get a free trial but the police is taking that constitutional right away by slapping NSA with no justification.”
Retired IPS officer S.R. Darapuri is of the view that the National Security Act cases are part of Hindutva project to victimize Muslims and Dalits in Uttar Pradesh. He says, “Chief minister Yogi has turned Uttar Pradesh into a police state. This is because he lacks administrative experience. The claim of Yogi Adityanath’s government to control crime has been proven wrong. For the first time in Indian history, this law is being misused so much. This is part of the BJP policy to rule through terror. They are using the police as their power arm to overawe the Dalits and minorities. If there are clashes like those in Bahraich, Barabanki, Azamgarh and Kanpur, the police proceedings should be against both parties but that hasn’t happened deliberately.”
Kranti L.C., executive director of the Human Rights Law Network, argues that many of such cases should be able to come to the judiciary. “It is clear that there is a slant to the investigation because all the arrests are from the marginalized communities. This has to be looked at constitutionally. The court should be able to see these slants.”
Activists argue that Yogi government is trying to prove that a large number of Muslims are a threat to National Security. “This is a Manuwadi trend. The RSS and Hindu Nationalist parties do not think of Muslims and Dalits as part of the Hindu rashtra project. Before the 2019 elections, the NSA is being imposed selectively to show them as a threat to national security and consolidate vote banks locally on communal lines,” says Rajiv Yadav.
This article is part of a fellowship from the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) to undertake field-based investigative research on issues relating to the marginalised communities in India
Neha Dixit is an independent journalist based out of New Delhi. She covers politics, gender and social justice in South Asia.
Much is at stake for every political party: the survival of the BSP and of Mayawati as a Dalit leader, the credibility and standing of two young leaders Rahul and Akhilesh and the future of the BJP as a dominant Hindu nationalist party.
Much is at stake for every political party: the survival of the BSP and of Mayawati as a Dalit leader, the credibility and standing of two young leaders Rahul and Akhilesh and the future of the BJP as a dominant Hindu nationalist party.
BJP president Amit Shah with party MP and Hindutva firebrand Yogi Aditya Nath during an election road show in Gorakhpur district on Thursday. Credit: PTI
With the sixth and seventh phases of the Uttar Pradesh elections set for March 4 and 8, the spotlight is on Poorvanchal – the poorest and most backward region in the state with 89 seats up for grabs. As there seems to be no wave for any particular political party, though all claim to be winning, a fierce, increasingly ugly three-way contest is expected here between the Bahujan Samaj Party, Bharatiya Janata Party and the Samajwadi Party-Congress alliance. Despite the high stakes involved, the results look inconclusive as the contestants are well matched.
In the post-independence period, the Left and Socialist parties were strong in this region and led a number of radical movements. With their decline, the Congress was able to gain the votes of the Dalits, Muslims and poorer sections of the population, until its own collapse in the late 1980s. In the 1990s, eastern UP became the stronghold of the ‘social justice’ advocates – the SP and the BSP – as the Dalits and OBCs came to believe that these parties would improve their condition, something the Left forces had failed to do. Both Kanshi Ram and Mulayam Singh Yadav have considered Poorvanchal their citadel. But with the ideological and organisational deterioration of these parties, it has become a region where bahubalis or mafia dons reign supreme.
In eastern UP, three important developments have taken place in the 2000s that could impact the voting pattern in the sixth round of elections.
Phase-wise election break up of Uttar Pradesh constituencies. Credit: ECI
The pasmanda movement of the poorer and lower caste Ansari Muslims – most of whom are handloom weavers in Mau and surrounding districts – that has swept eastern UP and Bihar since the early 1990s has constructed a new ‘backward’ Muslim identity and heightened political consciousness that has empowered them to challenge the dominance of the upper caste/class Ashraf elite. The movement coincided with the acceptance of the Mandal report, which granted them reservation as a backward class. Consequently, they have today emerged as a significant critical mass, heralding a new kind of Muslim politics which is more about secularism and redistributive justice including reform of personal law, quality education, business skills and protection of their handlooms, than about identity and representation. This is seen in the rise of small, independent Muslim parties in eastern UP, the most important being the Peace Party supported by the younger and educated sections of the community.
During the same period, globalisation and the decline of the handloom weaving industry has created a crisis which has impacted on the livelihood of the Ansari Muslims. Political empowerment has been accompanied by loss of livelihood, leaving them unhappy and hostile, rendering them vulnerable to mobilisation and conflicts with Hindu traders. Today, the textile industry is facing problems due to the exorbitant increase in electricity charges, limited supply of power, rise in prices and non-supply of raw material, which have pushed the weavers to look toward other jobs. Simultaneously, the continuing economic backwardness of the region and decay of political parties into feudal and corrupt organisations interested only in the capture of power, has promoted the criminalisation of politics and supported and encouraged communalism.
These changes have significant implications for the relationship between Muslims and Hindus in eastern UP, including, in more recent years, the Dalits. The Ansari Muslims are in search of a party that will provide them development and are divided over voting for their traditional identity-related party, the SP, and others that promise development. They are unhappy that no government has tried to improve the condition of the poorer sections of the region and that local problems are not an issue in the ongoing election campaign. While in the earlier phases of the campaign, development was given importance, in the later phases, identity based on caste and communalism has returned and is occupying a central position. Clearly, in their perception, despite the din of the elections, no acche din seem imminent here.
The BJP and its affiliates have taken full advantage of the changes in the polity and economy of the region, which has made the Hindu traders and Muslim weavers, and the poorer and disadvantaged sections of the population vulnerable to communal mobilisation. The region has witnessed since the late 1990s the rise of a new Hindutva communal power centre – fairly independent of and which often challenges the BJP-RSS organization – headed by Yogi Adityanath, mahanth (head) of the Gorakhnath temple near Gorakhpur. The Yogi is attempting to create communal polarisation and tension to build a strong and inclusive Hindu identity, most importantly by bringing the Dalits and backwards – who constitute a large number here – into the saffron fold and pitching them against the Muslims. Today, Poorvanchal is the Yogi’s experimental Hindutva laboratory of social engineering. When he first emerged on the political scene, his supporters shouted, “Gorakhpur mein rahna hai toh yogi yogi kahna hoga!” (To live in Gorakhpur one has to chant, Yogi, Yogi). As his area of influence expands, this slogan is also taking new forms. “Poorvanchal mein rahna hai toh yogi yogi kahna hai!” (To live in Purvanchal one has to chant, Yogi, Yogi).
Yogi Adityanath’s influence is strong in the region from Bahraich to Gorakhpur. An important reason is that the region, except for Gorakhpur, has a large Muslim population and the emergence of a number of madrassas has created intensive media attention on the Muslims of the region, leading the BJP-RSS to join hands with the Vishwa Hindu Parishad to fight “these anti-national” elements which the Yogi has labeled as the ‘hub of terrorism’.
The region is also the focus of attention of Hindutva forces because it is the hotbed of Naxalite activities and the CPI (ML) and, in their assessment, is expected to be the breeding ground of Muslim insurgents. Consequently, Hindutva politics is more intense in this region and the BJP hopes to do well in the election here.
Yogi Adityanath functions through different cultural organisations. The most important is the Hindu Yuva Vahini (HYV), formed in 2002, that comprises mostly unemployed youth, petty criminals and young men striving for an identity. It has been involved in much communally sensitive activity, including the Mau riots of October 2005 and the Gorakhpur riots in January 2007, leading to the burning of trains and buses in Padrauna and reports of arson in Mau, Basti, Kushinagar, Deoria and Maharajganj. These incidents have created a rift between Hindus and Muslims in the region.
However, the presence of the Yogi since the late 1990s has not helped the BJP in assembly elections; the party is not in a strong position here. The party had won only 11 assembly seats out of 89 in the 2012 assembly elections; the SP won 50, BSP 14 and the Congress 7. This explains the almost desperate, highly aggressive stance of the BJP leaders– including the use of terms such as ‘Kasab’ by Amit Shah and the attempts to polarise communities by Narendra Modi by referring talking of graveyards and cremation grounds.
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav addresses a press conference at party headquarters in Lucknow on Friday. Credit: PTI Photo by Nand Kumar
In the 2014 elections, the BJP performed well in Poorvanchal, but this was due to the Modi wave; it is not an area where it traditionally had a base. Modi’s selection of Varanasi as his constituency, his addressing the largest number of rallies in this region in the entire state – combining promises of development with a highly communal campaign – enabled the BJP to win all the seats in the region. The only exception was Azamgarh, which was won by Mulayam Singh Yadav despite the Modi wave. The BJP hopes to repeat this performance but is not sure. Although Mulayam Singh has not campaigned in his Yadav stronghold, Akhilesh has addressed a large number of rallies in Azamgarh and the SP-Congress alliance, by presenting a united face, hopes to win all the 10 seats in Azamgarh district.
The BSP had a strong base here in the late 1980s and 1990s and was the biggest challenger to the Modi wave in 2014 by coming second in 34 Lok Sabha constituencies – many of them in eastern UP. The party hopes to perform well here, which explains Mayawati’s belligerence during her recent rallies. What is critical for Mayawati is obtaining the support of the Muslims and non-Jatav Dalits, particularly the Pasis, Khatiks and other smaller sub-castes in the region who are politically alert and aware that they have choices beyond behenji today. The number of anti-Dalit incidents in 2016, beginning with the Rohith Vemula suicide and the public thrashing of Dalits in Gujarat by cow vigilante groups did seem to lead to Dalit consolidation behind Mayawati. But it remains to be seen if this gets translated into voting and seats. Mayawati has also given a ticket to Mukhtar Ansari, the biggest Mafia don of the region, who has somewhat of a ‘Robin Hood’ image here, in the hope of increasing her Muslim support in Mau and surrounding districts.
The remaining stretch of the UP campaign in Poorvanchal is clearly a no-holds barred fight between the three principal players. Much is at stake for every political party and its leaders: the survival of the BSP and of Mayawati as a Dalit leader, the credibility and standing of two young leaders Rahul and Akhilesh and their secular and development-based alliance in a backward but politically aware region, and the future of the BJP as a dominant Hindu nationalist party and its leader Narendra Modi, who is keen to surge ahead of these parties and go forward to win in 2019. Uttar Pradesh has always been a key state in Indian electoral politics but what is at stake this time is the kind of polity and society that we wish to establish in the country.
Special mobile apps, software, infrastructure, training for personnel and feedback mechanisms have been created to make voting easier for persons with disabilities.
Special mobile apps, software, infrastructure, training for personnel and feedback mechanisms have been created to make voting easier for persons with disabilities.
Screenshot of the feedback form created to get responses from persons with disabilities regarding their experience voting at the polls. Credit: Disability Rights Association
While the 2017 assembly elections in UP, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Manipur and Goa seem to be hitting new lows in terms of political rhetoric and insinuations, not everything about them is vulgar and depraved. Behind the scenes of political fanfare, a motley group of persons with disabilities and some well-meaning officials have been working closely with the Election Commission to ensure that this exercise in electoral franchise is also remembered as one that allowed a large number of persons with disabilities to vote without any impediment.
Right from upgrading the different states’ electoral commission websites to make them more disabled-friendly, to creating mobile apps for mapping PwDs locations and encouraging them to step out, a variety of steps are being taken to include more people in the electoral process.
Besides this, for the first time the EC will issue voter slips in Braille and newly recruited government officials are also being trained to assist voters with disabilities at the booths. Additionally, ramps, for easier mobility, are becoming a regular feature of these elections, and door partitions are being done away with to allow people on wheel-chairs easy access to the polling booths. Finally, special feedback slips have been prepared to get feedback from persons with disabilities to improve provisions in the future.
What has made the entire exercise so fascinating this time is that a large number of persons with disabilities, working with various organisations or as administration officials in the states, have been involved in the planning and implementation of this exercise.
Officers in Azamgarh lead by example
One such official is Suhas L.Y., the district magistrate of Azamgarh in UP, a constituency which will go to the polls on March 4. Suhas, along with Ritu Suhas, another civil servant and nodal officer for the Systematic Voters’ Education and Electoral Participation (SVEEP) in Azamgarh, developed an app for persons with disabilities called Booth Dost, which helps a person locate his booth and booth level officer and vice versa and also look up the facilities offered at the given booth in light of his or her disability.
The app also provides Google map locations of the booths and has helped link 30,583 voters with disabilities in the region. Talking about the initiative, Suhas told The Wire: “So far we have done quite well with regards to the Booth Dost programme. We have the highest number of PwD voters in UP… We had conducted door to door surveys and identified voters with disabilities and had mapped them. We also linked them to the booth and put in the details in a mobile application.”
Training hands and winning trust
To motivate the voters, Suhas – who won gold in the Asian Para-Badminton Championship in November 2016, said, “every PwD voter is also being given a pink colour ‘vishwas parchi’ (trust slip) which shows that the administration is concerned about them. Then 600 newly recruited lekhpals (accountants with the revenue department) will help out the PwDs at the polling centres.”
“For the first time in India,” he said, “Braille voter slips have also been introduced. It gives out the number and name of the booth and the number of vote. It is an inclusive exercise.” And to ensure that voters do not face any trouble at the booths, he said: “We are ensuring ramps [are constructed] at all the booths and we are not partitioning the doors so wheelchair-bound people will also be able to ingress and egress with ease.”
Icons and role models being used as motivators
As part of the exercise, the administration has also been using its visually impaired district icon Vibha Goel, to not only motivate persons with disabilities but also to design dresses for the SVEEP workers. Incidentally, these dresses are being made using the dying craft and block print style of ‘Mubarakpur handloom.’ Other persons with disabilities have been designated as Booth Ratnas to motivate other voters at the block level.
Meanwhile, in Delhi, Dr. Satendra Singh, associate professor of physiology at the University College of Medical Sciences and Delhi’s GTB Hospital, and a person with disability, has along with Prashant, whose vision is 80 % impaired, helped the Election Commission of India conduct a workshop on web accessibility in which officers from the poll-bound states were trained on various aspects of making the exercise more meaningful for persons with disabilities.
Singh said officers from UP, Uttarakhand and Manipur, and even from Gujarat – which goes to polls later in the year – participated in the workshop. Those from Punjab and Goa could not attend it as it was held quite close to their polling day.
Upgrading websites, rectifying problems
“Most of the officers had a technical background and knew quite a bit about it. We told them that if there are visually impaired voters or those with colour blindness then various provisions would be needed to help them access the websites of the Election Commission. Prashant told them that till now most sites were using JAWS (Job Access with Speech) software, which was a costly one, but now we have an open access office which is freely available. We demonstrated its use and told them how to identify the problems faced by the visually impaired.”
Singh said the officers were also showed the websites of the election offices of the five poll-bound states and how to rectify the problems persons of disabilities face in using them. He said the officers from Gujarat actually gained a lot from the event as they are in the process of changing their website.
Smitha Sadasivan from the Disability Legislation Unit, in Vidyasagar, Chennai, who is also a member of Disability Rights Alliance and in a wheelchair herself due to multiple sclerosis, has also been instrumental in making the elections more inclusive. She had worked on creating access audit checklists which are helping the booth-level officers identify the areas that need work for making the booths more accessible. She has also assisted in developing a feedback form which seeks responses from persons with disabilities about the problems they face.
How much these developments will help the voters will only become known on March 4, when the exercise will be tested in Azamgarh.