Indian Police ‘Harassed’ Sikh Activist in UK Before His Sudden Death: The Guardian

The newspaper’s investigation also raised questions about the UK police’s earlier claim that Avtar Singh Khanda’s death was the subject of a “thorough review” and that there was no foul play suspected.

New Delhi: Avtar Singh Khanda, a pro-Khalistan activist based in the UK, claimed just months before his sudden death in June this year that he was verbally harassed by Indian police who also threatened his family in Punjab, according to The Guardian.

Indian agencies accused Khanda of radicalising Sikh youth in the UK with extremist and separatist ideology. He was one of the prime accused in the pulling down of the tricolour at the Indian high commission in London during a protest by pro-Khalistan groups.

The Guardian‘s investigation has also raised questions about the West Midlands police’s earlier claim that Khanda’s sudden death was the subject of a “thorough review” and that there was no foul play suspected.

Khand died on June 15, four days after he was admitted to a hospital in Birmingham, UK. He was recently diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia, an aggressive blood cancer. His associates suspected foul play – claiming he was poisoned – but British officials did not agree.

Now, The Guardian reports that the West Midlands force “appeared to distance itself from its original statement to the press, when it said the matter had been ‘thoroughly’ investigated”. But the police say they are still “satisfied that there are no suspicious circumstances”.

Khanda’s friends, fellow Sikh activists and family members told the UK newspaper that the “insistence by British authorities that a deeper investigation is not warranted fails to take into account damning details that have emerged about India’s alleged involvement in a global campaign of transnational repression aimed at Sikh separatists”.

The Indian government is facing allegations that its agents were involved in the killing of a Canadian Sikh in Vancouver just days after Khanda’s death, while a plot allegedly directed by an ‘identified Indian government employee‘ to kill an American Sikh was thwarted by US law enforcement agencies around the same time.

Also Read: From Nijjar to Pannun, Modi Government’s Recklessness is Undermining National Interest

According to The Guardian, Khanda’s associates contradicted official statements that the death was investigated by West Midlands police. The police “did not take statements from friends and family after his death, did not speak to his employers or work colleagues, did not retrace his steps on the days before his sudden illness, did not visit his residence or study threats made against him, and did not issue a case number, which would indicate the matter had been investigated”, the report says. Khanda appeared “healthy and robust” in the weeks before his death, associates in Birmingham said.

His mother and sister told the newspaper that they were the subject of an “aggressive intimidation campaign by Indian authorities in the months before [Khanda’s] death”. While Indian agencies considered Khanda a close aide of Amritpal Singh, the Sikh separatist and leader of Waris Punjab De who was arrested in April, his family “staunchly” denied any connection.

When Amritpal Singh was on the run, Khanda’s mother and sister were ‘picked up‘ by the Punjab police. His sister Jaspreet Kaur told The Guardian that at the police station, the police used her phone to call Khanda in the UK and instructed her “to tell my brother that I was on my own and ask him to confide in me: that the police were harassing me but I had found a room to myself and could he tell me where is Amritpal Singh hiding and can he give any details”.

“During the questioning they would call Avtar from my phone and speak directly to him, making threats, saying that ‘we’ve got your sister here, where is Amritpal? We know that you know.’ Avtar’s response would always be the same: that he had never met Amritpal and had no idea where he was and could the police please stop harassing his family who have nothing to do with this, there’s nothing they or I can give you,” she told the newspaper.

Khanda, in a video posted on his personal Facebook page in April, also complained about the Indian police’s alleged harassment of his family. “Police have been harassing me for the last four days. I am getting calls after calls from different police stations and they say the same thing again and again and again, and that is ‘where is Amritpal Singh?’,” he said in the video.

Michael Polak, a lawyer representing Khanda’s family, said the activist “began receiving threats against his life” after he was “wrongly implicated” in the removal of the Indian flag from the high commission of Indian in London in March this year.

Dera Chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, 4 Others Get Life Term in Sect Manager Murder Case

Former Dera manager Ranjit Singh, who was also a follower of the sect, was shot dead on July 10, 2002 at Khanpur Kolian village in Haryana’s Kurukshetra.

Chandigarh: A special CBI court on Monday sentenced Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh and four others to life imprisonment in the 19-year-old murder case of sect manager Ranjit Singh.

The court in Panchkula had convicted Ram Rahim and four others – Krishan Lal, Jasbir Singh, Avtar Singh and Sabdil – in the murder case on October 8.

The court has sentenced five to life imprisonment, said CBI special prosecutor H.P.S. Verma.

Former Dera manager Ranjit Singh, who was also a follower of the sect, was shot dead on July 10, 2002 at Khanpur Kolian village in Haryana’s Kurukshetra.

He was murdered for his suspected role in the circulation of an anonymous letter, which narrated how women were allegedly being sexually exploited by the sect head at the Dera headquarters.

According to the CBI chargesheet, the Dera chief believed that Ranjit Singh was behind the circulation of the anonymous letter and hatched a conspiracy to kill him. In 2017, Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for raping two disciples. He is currently lodged in Rohtak’s Sunaria jail.

Delhi: Municipal Corporation Leaders Say COVID-19 Death Toll Is Over 2,000

While the official tally stood at 1,085 as on Thursday, the Delhi government said the death audit committee is “working impartially”.

New Delhi: Senior leaders of the three BJP-led municipal corporations on Thursday claimed that over 2,000 COVID-19 deaths haven taken place in Delhi, while the official tally stood at 1,085 as on Thursday.

The Delhi government, reacting to the claim said, the COVID-19 death audit committee is “working impartially”, and this was “not a time for blame-game but to work together”.

At a press conference held at Civic Centre, North Delhi mayor Avtar Singh, East Delhi mayor Anju Kamalkant and chairpersons of the standing committees of NDMC, SDMC and EDMC shared the challenges faced by the corporations in the time of the coronavirus pandemic.

“Earlier also the [Arvind] Kejriwal government had reported less death when our tally from crematoria and burial sites had shown nearly three times of the official toll. And, now as per these figures, the number of deaths from COVID-19 in Delhi stands at 2,098 – SDMC (1080), NDMC (976), EDMC (42),” claimed Jai Prakash, the chairman of Standing Commitee of the NDMC.

Prakash shared the figures during the press conference.

The Delhi government later in a statement said, it has set up a Death Audit Committee comprising of senior doctors, who are “working impartially towards assessing deaths caused by coronavirus infection”.

“The Hon’ble Delhi High Court has also declared that the Death Audit Committee is working in an appropriate manner and that the work of the committee cannot be questioned,” it said.

“We believe that not even a single life must be lost to Coronavirus. This is a time to unite and save the lives of the people. This is not the time to make allegations after allegations, we all have to fight this pandemic together and ensure that not a single life is lost due to coronavirus,” the statement said.

Delhi recorded 1,877 fresh coronavirus cases on Thursday, the highest single-day spike here pushing the COVID-19 tally in the city to over 34,000-mark, and the death toll due to the disease mounted to 1,085, authorities said.

Senior civic leaders late May had also claimed that there was a “massive discrepancy” between the COVID-19 death toll as recorded from cremation and burial sites here, and the number of coronavirus fatalities reported by the Delhi government.

The COVID-19 death toll, according to an official bulletin released by the Delhi health department, stood at 194 on May 21, while the tally from MCD figures was nearly 600 till that date, NDMC’s Prakash had earlier said.

The NDMC panel chief said, despite paucity of funds, the civic bodies are fighting the COVID-19 battle.

“Our workers are carrying sanitation, collecting biomedical waste, doing sanitation of homes of people who are under home quarantine, but the Delhi government says we are not cooperating. How fair is that,” he said.

Prakash also claimed, MCD drivers are helping operate CATS ambulance.

“We are ready to give all our infrastructure, from stadia to community halls for converting them into medical facilities. We should end blame game and work together to fight corona,” he added.

Davinder Singh and a System Which Rewards Officers Who Produce ‘Convenient Results’

An opportunistic system that is willing to turn the other way as long as ‘bad officers’ produce results is the real culprit.

That DSP Davinder Singh of the J&K Police was caught “transporting” two hardcore Hizbul Mujahideen terrorists and one overground worker (OGW), apparently for a paltry fee of Rs 12 lakh should not come as a surprise. What is really a matter of serious concern is that the system had not only “tolerated” him for so long but had also rewarded him. He was due to be promoted as SP shortly.

The tragedy of this country is that as long as bad officers produce “convenient” results, the system rewards them and takes credit for their work. The moment bad officers produce “inconvenient” results, an opportunistic system dumps them and absolves itself of all responsibility.

Davinder had come close to trouble several times. In 2001, he was transferred out of Budgam after massive public protests against custodial deaths. In 2015, he and another DSP of the Special Operations Group (SOG) were named in an FIR for allegedly extorting money from common people and implicating them in false cases. However, no material damage was done.

Also Read: Some Questions for Mr Doval About Kashmir Police Officer Davinder Singh’s Terror Link

Before his execution in 2013, Afzal Guru had claimed in a letter from Tihar to his lawyer that Singh had ordered him to take a man to Delhi and arrange accommodation for him. That man was later shot dead in the Parliament attack case. Afzal Guru was arrested when he went back to Srinagar after his Delhi task was over. Several political parties in Kashmir had demanded that allegations of Davinder having set-up Afzal be investigated.

Nothing happened for obvious reasons—the system had to defend itself. Moreover, who cares when lives are sniffed out to satisfy the ‘collective conscience‘ of a nation and in producing “convenient” results? When asked about Afzal’s allegations, the IG of J&K said the police had no information about it in their records. However, once the allegation was made and political parties too demanded an inquiry, it was incumbent upon the police to do so. People do not have any trust in the police, and are reluctant to register complaints against one of them.

Afzal Guru

The IG also added that Davinder would be treated ‘at par with militants’ (sic). Obviously, the intention was to pre-empt an accusation that they would perhaps treat one of their own with velvet gloves – the law does not discriminate amongst accused.

This is not the first time that a bad officer producing “convenient” results was rewarded by the system. In October 2017, gallantry medals given to three police officials, namely, Dharmendra Choudhary, former Madhya Pradesh additional SP, Punjab police SI Gurmeet Singh and Jharkhand police SI Lalit Kumar were withdrawn after they were found to be involved in fake encounter, murder and corruption cases.

The Andhra Pradesh fake encounter case

In 2010, advocate K.N. Rao filed a PIL before the Andhra Pradesh high court stating that three senior IPS officers of the state – Shiv Shankar, Sriram Tiwari and Nalin Prabhat – had never participated in the gun battle with alleged Naxal leaders at Koyyur forest in Karimnagar, and hence could not claim credit for the killing the top leaders, namely, Nalla Adi Reddy, Seelam Naresha and Santosh Reddy on December 2, 1999. Civil rights groups had alleged that the three were arrested by the police from their shelter in Bangalore, brought to Karimnagar in a helicopter and killed in a fake encounter.

A division bench comprising Justice G. Raghu Ram and Justice G.V. Seethapathi expressed displeasure over the way the Central government had gone ahead with the process of awarding gallantry medals to these IPS officers without minimum verification. Observing that the way the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) had dealt with the issue had put the prestige and integrity of the medals in jeopardy, the court asked the central government to reconsider the awards. The Court did not accept the Centre’s contention that it had gone by the recommendation of the state government and said, “The Centre has a fiduciary duty in processing the recommendation of the state government for the award of medals and it can neither be abdicated nor outsourced to the state.” The court commented that the “award of medal is not an act of patronage…a spoil of political office nor the product of whim…”

The Andhra Pradesh high court commented that the “award of medal is not an act of patronage…a spoil of political office nor the product of whim…”. Photo: PTI

Earlier, the state government had ordered a probe in the matter when some IPS officers also complained about it. However, the inquiry was dropped in 2007 after these officers claimed that they were present on the spot of the encounter, but their names were not included in the records on the grounds of security! This defies logic. Maybe this could have prevented the Naxals from learning their names at that time. However, once they got medals, their names and the citations became public knowledge. What could save them from the Naxals then? Did the government intend to tell the people that they gave gallantry medals on blank citations and that it guaranteed security for life! In mid-2005, the state wrote to the Centre, asking the latter to take further action in the matter, including cancellation of the gallantry awards. However, the file apparently got lost in the bureaucratic maze of the MHA. Media reports had even named a former DGP of the state of persuading the Centre not to pursue the matter further.

Also Read: Tensions Brew Within UP Police After Leak of Letter Alleging Bribery Racket on Transfers

There are cops and army officers like Avtar Singh, who do horrible, filthy things to fellow human beings, which would fill a normal person with revulsion. However, claims that such things happen because there are a few bad hats in the system, is to close our eyes to the real dishonourable intentions of the system. Such people survive and thrive because the system has vested interests in exploiting their “perversions” for its own ephemeral gains. It drops them only when their evil deeds become too hot to hold.

N.C. Asthana, a retired IPS officer, has been DGP Kerala and a long-time ADG CRPF and BSF. Views are personal.

First Death Sentence for 1984 Massacres Revives Hope Among Victims

A 55-year-old transporter will be sent to the gallows. His associate, a retired postmaster, was sentenced to life.

In a major victory for those seeking justice for the 1984 Sikh massacre victims, the first death sentence was pronounced by a Delhi court on Wednesday. Yashpal Singh, who was on November 15 convicted along with Naresh Sherawat for killing two persons in Mahipalpur area, was given the death sentence. Sherawat was sentenced to life. They have both also been fined Rs 35 lakhs each.

The judgement has given hope to the Sikh community that more perpetrators would be brought to book.

Case was reopened by SIT

This judgment also marks a significant turn in the prosecution of the accused. The case had been closed by the Delhi police in 1994, but it was reopened following the constitution of a Special Investigation Team in 2015.

In the riots that erupted following the assassination of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984, over 7,000 Sikhs are said to have been massacred. But official data puts the toll at 3,350 of which 2,733 killings took place in Delhi alone.

After the BJP government came to power in 2014, it constituted a Special Investigation Team to investigate all the cases including those that had been closed. While the SIT found merit in just 12 cases, the Supreme Court held that it had not done proper investigation with respect to 186 cases. Following the apex court’s order, another SIT, headed by former Delhi high court judge S.N. Dhingra, was formed.

Both convicts attacked neighbours, set their shops on fire

Singh and Sherawat were convicted for rioting and murder of their neighbours Hardev Singh and Avtar Singh. They were also held guilty for injuring three other persons – Surjeet Singh, Sangat Singh and Kuldeep Singh.

Also read: If Rahul Gandhi is Asked About the 1984 Killings Again, This is What He Should Say

The SIT in its chargesheet recorded the statements by Kuldeep, Sangat and Surjeet, who had survived the attack, had accused their neighbours Naresh Sherawat and Yashpal Singh of attacking them. The attackers, the survivors said, were part of a mob which set three grocery shops on fire in Mahipalpur on November 1, 1984.

“The three hid themselves in a first floor room along with Hardev and Avtar. The mob forcibly entered the room, assaulted the five men and threw them down from the first floor. They set the room on fire. Hardev and Avtar succumbed to their injuries, while the other three survived. The survivors identified Naresh as the one who was carrying a can of kerosene and Yashpal as the one who lit the fire,” the SIT chargesheet stated.

The case was filed nine years after the riots, in 1993, at the Vasant Kunj police station on the complaint of Santok Singh, Hardev Singh’s brother. Santok had filed an affidavit before the Justice Ranganath Misra Commission that probed the killings.

Key witnesses deposed in the case

In 1994, the Delhi police had closed the case citing lack of evidence. But it was reopened by the SIT in 2016 after it found some vital evidence in it. During the prosecution, the SIT relied on the statements of several of the witnesses. One of them was Avtar Singh’s brother, Ratan Singh, who came to India from Italy to depose in the matter. He recorded his statement last month.

Also read: India’s Justice System Has Failed Victims of the 1984 Anti-Sikh Massacre

Four doctors from the AIIMS and one from Safdarjung Hospital also made statements. The witnesses also included the then investigating officer and assistant commissioner of police of the anti-riot cell, S.K. Malik. Another key witness was inspector Yogesh, who translated Santok’s affidavit from Punjabi to English.

The judgement on conviction was pronounced by additional sessions judge Ajay Pandey after the hearing on November 15. He held that the offence and culpability of both the convicts fell into the ‘rarest of rare’ category. “They being the influential neighbours of the victims, without any provocation, caused horrendous crime of murder and looting in order to eliminate all five victims [three were injured] just because of their faith, community or religion,” the judge said.

The quantum of the sentence was announced in Tihar Jail, where the convicts are lodged.

Sikh politicians hail verdict

The verdict has been hailed by Sikh leaders from different political parties. Punjab chief minister Amrinder Singh tweeted: “Welcome the first conviction by a Delhi court in the 1984 riots case. Justice has finally been meted out to the perpetrators of the heinous crimes. Hope the others involved in the attacks are also soon brought to book for their horrendous and inhuman acts.”

Also watch: The 1984 Sikh Massacre Explained

Akali leaders have also lauded the conviction. Union cabinet minister Harsimrat Kaur Badal tweeted: “They killed! They burnt! They raped! Today they hang!! I thank Waheguru for giving Sikhs a ray of hope in today’s verdict against two culprits of #1984SikhGenocide & pray for similar punishment for Sajjan, Tytler, & their partners in crimes against Sikhs!!”

A closure for the families

The case has also brought a sense of closure for the families of the victims. Santok Singh, the complainant, said: “It is a big victory for humanity. We are satisfied with the judgment though we wanted court to award deaths to both the convicts.”

Incidentally, Aam Aadmi Party leader and senior advocate H.S. Phoolka, who has been fighting the cases of the riot victims, for 34 years, also appeared in this case of Yashpal Singh and Naresh Sherawat.

He earlier told The Wire that hearing was recently concluded in a case in which former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar is an accused.