Lakhimpur-Kheri Violence: Farmers Livid Over ‘Conspirator’ Teni’s Name on BJP’s LS Candidate List

Farmers’ unions allege that Ajay Kumar Mishra ‘Teni’ and his son Ashish Mishra are co-conspirators in the October 3, 2021 violence, which killed eight people and injured 10.

Lucknow: Farmers have strongly objected to the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) candidature of Ajay Mishra “Teni” for the Lakhimpur-Kheri parliamentary seat in Uttar Pradesh. The farmer leaders, demanding Teni’s resignation since the horrific Lakhimpur-Kheri 2021 incident, were stunned to see Teni’s name included in the first list of BJP candidates for the upcoming general elections.

After the BJP announced Teni’s candidature, annoyed farmer leaders reacted by saying, “The BJP has sprinkled salt on our wounds.” They decided to oppose the BJP and Teni both in the general election and call the BJP “pro-corporate, anti-farmers.”

On March 3 in New Delhi, the BJP released the names of 195 candidates from 16 states and two Union territories. Teni is a junior minister in the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led Union government’s home department. Junior minister’s son, Ashish Mishra, is charged with being involved in the Lakhimpur Kheri incident, which claimed the lives of four farmers and a journalist.

Sanyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM), an umbrella body of several farmer unions, believes two-term parliamentarian Teni was a conspirator in the Lakhimpur-Kheri incident and has been putting pressure on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government for Teni’s resignation from the Council of Ministers for the past two years. The demand for his resignation is also part of the ongoing farmer protest on the outskirts of the national capital, Delhi.

Also read: In Lakhimpur Kheri, BJP Proves India Has No Rule of Law Today

Irked farmer leaders demanded that the BJP’s top brass withdraw Teni’s candidature or face the consequences of betraying farmers in the next elections. According to Ashish Mittal, executive member of the SKM coordination committee, “Now it is clear that under the BJP’s rule, alleged criminals like Teni and Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh thrive while poor students, women, labourers, and farmers face state-sponsored repression.”

Mittal is concerned about the future of democracy in the country, saying, “By giving a ticket to Teni, the BJP has sent a loud and clear message that if it retains power in 2024, it will crush all democratic movements.” Mittal, who is also the general secretary of the Akhil Bharatiya Kisan Mazdoor Sabha, is accusing the BJP government of hypocrisy for honouring the pro-farmer agronomist M.S. Swaminathan with the Bharat Ratan award while also supporting a candidate responsible for the deaths of farmers.

Another farmer leader, Mukut Singh, the national joint secretary of All India Kisan Sabha, told The Wire that farmers will not retreat from their demand at any cost to register a first information report against Teni in the Lakhimpur-Kheri case under Section 120-B (Criminal Conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.

Despite the numerous nationwide protests organised by farmers against Teni, Singh continued, “His candidacy exemplifies the anti-democratic stance of the BJP.” The farmer leader continued by stating that the SKM will urge the nation’s farmers to vote against the anti-farmer BJP in the forthcoming elections.

“The tragic reminiscence of the Lakhimpur incident remains alive in our hearts. The BJP hurt the farmer’s sentiments by giving tickets to Teni,” says K. Krishnaprasad, AKIS’ finance secretary. When questioned about the political impacts of Teni’s candidature, farmer leader K. Krishnaprasad stated that farmers all over the nation, not just in Uttar Pradesh, are furious with the BJP’s decision – now farmers are overthrowing this BJP’s arrogant government in the next election.

Local farmers of Lakhimpur-Kheri are also upset and want the BJP to reconsider its decision. Following the release of the BJP’s candidate list, a meeting of the Bharatiya Kisaan Union was convened, according to Dilbhag Singh “Sindhu,” the district president of the union.

Farmers protested Teni’s candidature and demanded that Modi replace him with another candidate. “Astonishingly, a man who should be imprisoned for his heinous conspiracy against farmers is going to contest for office on the symbol of the ruling party,” says disgruntled farmer leader Sindhu.

Ishwari Prasad Kushwaha, secretary of Kisaan Mahasabha (Tikait), views the BJP’s decision to field Teni from Lakimpur-Kheri as mocking crores of Indian farmers, while they persist in demanding his resignation. According to him, farmers are angry with the BJP, and they plan to raise the Lakhimpur-Kheri issue at the Mahapanchayat on March 14 at Ramlila Ground in Delhi.

“BJP promised to double the farmers’ income in 2014, but after getting power, put the farmer’s issues like the demand of MSP, etc. on the back burner and turned blind eyes towards their plights,” says Kushwaha. Anguished farmers would upset the apple cart of the BJP because it has been dancing to corporate tunes and repressing farmers for a decade since coming to power in 2014.

It is to be recalled that on October 3, 2021, Teni’s son’s convoy allegedly rammed three farmers and a journalist in Tikunia, Lakhimpur-Kheri. The deceased farmers were returning from protesting three Modi government farm laws when the incident occurred. Later on, after a long and massive farmer protest, the government repealed these laws.

Farmers in the Lakimpur-Kheri district say that Teni, who is the minister of state for home, went to an event in Palia, Lakhimpur Kheri district, in September 2021. Some members of the farmer’s union waved black flags as a protest during the event.

According to farmers, after this protest, Tani purportedly plotted a conspiracy to assassinate the farmers for protesting against the controversial farm laws.

Teni allegedly intimidated the protesting farmers during his speech, saying, “Sudhar jao, nahi toh hum sudhaar denge, do minute me.” (You better change your ways, or we’ll teach you a lesson in two minutes.) Rough translation from Hindi. A video of his speech went viral following the Lakimpur-Kheri incident. Farmers accuse Teni of orchestrating a conspiracy based on his speech and want him to step down as minister. They also want the government to prosecute him for the Lakhimpur incident.

SC Extends Lakhimpur-Accused Ashish Mishra’s Interim Bail

Ashish is the son of Union minister and Bharatiya Janata Party strongman Ajay Mishra.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has extended the interim bail granted to Union minister and Bharatiya Janata Party strongman Ajay Mishra’s son Ashish in the case where farmers protesting at Lakhimpur Kheri were mowed down in 2021.

In total, eight people were killed in the violence which was triggered when Ashish’s convoy allegedly ran over protesting farmers. The protest was against the Central laws that had been imposed and which were eventually withdrawn in 2021. Incidentally, farmers are back at Delhi’s borders, as their key demands from that time are yet to be fulfilled.

LiveLaw has reported that a bench of Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan noted on February 12 that since the last date of hearing on September 26, 2023, the apex court has received no report from the trial court on the progress of the case.

The Supreme Court thus asked the registry to get a report.

The court had earlier said that Ashish could stay neither in the Delhi National Capital Territory nor in UP for the eight weeks during which his interim bail will last and that he could enter Uttar Pradesh only to attend trial court proceedings. It later relaxed these conditions.

First arrested in October 2021, Ashish had to surrender in April 2022 after the Supreme Court cancelled the Allahabad high court’s February 2022 bail to him.

A Trial that Drags on and Unfulfilled Promises: Two Years of the Lakhimpur Killings

Families of those who died are willing to run the distance, that our legal system often asks of victims, for justice. But that alone has not been enough.

New Delhi: The personal loss suffered by Rajeev Gupta and Satnam Singh are separated by more than two decades but they share a common struggle for justice against one powerful man, Ajay Kumar Mishra ‘Teni’, the Union minister of state for home affairs.

While Gupta has accused Teni of murdering his brother Prabhat Gupta in 2000, Satnam is the father of Lovepreet Singh, one of the four protesting farmers who were mowed to death allegedly by Teni’s son Ashish Mishra ‘Monu’ and his friends on October 3, 2021. Both incidents happened in Tikonia area of Lakhimpur Kheri, a sugarcane-rich district of Uttar Pradesh bordering Nepal.

After the Allahabad high court in May acquitted Teni in the Prabhat Gupta murder case, his brother Rajeev, who has been fighting for justice since 2000, recently moved the Supreme Court where he filed a special leave petition. The Tikonia case of 2021, in which eight persons were killed in total – four farmers, one journalist, two BJP workers and their driver – drags on in a trial court in Lakhimpur Kheri. Monu, Teni’s son, is the main accused in the killing of the four farmers and the journalist. The aggrieved families as well as farmer groups constantly demanded, though without success, that Teni, who gave a provocative speech against the farmers in the days leading up to the October 3, 2021 incident, be booked for criminal conspiracy.

Two years later, Satnam Singh is yet to come to terms with his son’s brutal death. Three vehicles belonging to Teni’s convoy ran over protesting farmers, killing Lovepreet and three other farmers. He acknowledges that the legal battle is tough as they are faced against an influential opponent, currently enjoying one of the most powerful positions in the country. “There is no law for them. The law is only for chote log (small people). Even if they have 50 murders on their hands, nothing will happen to them,” says Satnam.

However, he is willing to run the distance, that our legal system often asks of victims, for justice. “Till we are alive, this struggle will go on.”

The Sikh community, to which Satnam belongs to, own and farm large tracts of land in Kheri and adjoining districts of Pilibhit, Bahraich and Bareilly. They were at the forefront of the farmer protests against the three farm bills introduced by the Narendra Modi government, in the Terai region of UP. Satnam, who lives in Palia area of Kheri, has two daughters. Lovepreet, his only son, aspired to go abroad to Australia, when the Tikonia tragedy cut short his dreams and life. He was barely 20. While Satnam and other aggrieved families received Rs 45 lakh ex-gratia compensation they were promised by the government, the promise of a government job is yet to be fulfilled.

Also read: Lakhimpur Kheri Tells Us It’s Time to Rescue a Democracy in Retreat

Like Monu, his father Teni has also been under the shadow of a murder allegation. In 2000, when he was a vice-president of the district cooperative bank and was yet to enter electoral politics, ‘Teni Maharaj’, as he is locally known as, was accused of murdering Prabhat Gupta, a youth leader of the Samajwadi Party in Tikonia. In 2004, a local sessions court acquitted Teni and three others in the murder case. Teni, the MP from Kheri, maintained that he is innocent and was framed due to political rivalry and enmity over panchayat elections.

Prabhat Gupta (with garland). Photo: Special Arrangement

It is alleged that on July 8, 2000 when Prabhat alias Raju was going to his shop from his house he was fired at on his temple and between his chest and abdomen. The Gupta family accused Teni and three accomplices of the murder. After Teni’s acquittal by a lower court, the case dragged on legally for more than two decades, full of adjournments and judicial delays. In May this year, the Allahabad HC finally pronounced its judgment. It upheld the trial court verdict and acquitted Teni for lack of evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt.

Rajeev Gupta was devastated by the decision. He says the HC overlooked evidence and witnesses that proved Teni’s guilt. However, he has not given up his resolve for justice. His SLP against the acquittal is expected to come up for hearing in the apex court on October 9. Gupta says he will not stop till he drags down Teni from his ministerial perch. “I will not stop fighting for justice. I was disappointed by the acquittal but haven’t given up. I will put myself on mortgage, seek donations but fight. My brother will not come back. But by getting justice I want to ignite hope for justice in others,” he says.

Over the last two days, Tikonia witnessed a flurry of activities from both sides. On October 2, Teni was the chief guest at a BJP karyakarta sammelan held in his ancestral village Banveerpur. Though his son Monu, who has been directed by the SC to not enter UP unless for his trial hearings, was not present at the event, his photo featured prominently on the banner put up for the meeting as well as on posters across the Nighasan area. Today, October 3, local farmers have organised a prayer meet and a Kabaddi competition in memory of the “shaheed” farmers and journalist who were killed.

Also read: ‘Lakhimpur Kheri Trial Could Take Up to 5 Years’: Uttar Pradesh District Court Tells SC

Exactly two years ago, an annual wrestling competition (dangal) was organised by Monu in the Mishra’s ancestral village Banveerpur in memory of Teni’s father. Teni along with UP deputy chief minister Keshav Prasad Maurya were the main guests at the event. A helipad was constructed on the playground of the Maharaja Agrasen Inter College in Tikonia for Maurya’s helicopter to land. However, protesting farmers gathered at the site in the morning and dug up the helipad. Maurya was forced to take the road and since protestors had blocked this particular route, the organisers of the event escorted him to the event from an alternate route.

The area had been simmering with tension ever since Teni on September 25, 2021, had provocatively warned the farmers agitating against the three farm laws, later repealed by Modi before elections in Punjab and UP, to “mend themselves” or else he would not take more than two minutes to mend them himself. Teni also reminded the farmers of his ‘past record’ before he was elected a public representative, which farmers interpreted as an open threat of violence, and said that he did “not run from any challenge.”

Scenes at the site of the incident in Tikonia, Lakhimpur Kheri on October 4, 2021 a day after the farmers were mowed down.

It was against these comments that farmers, many of them Sikh, had gathered in Tikonia that day when three vehicles, including a Thar in which Monu was allegedly sitting with his aides, belonging to Teni’s private convoy ran over them mercilessly and without provocation. Farmers Lovepreet Singh (19), Gurvinder Singh (18), Daljeet Singh (35) and Nachattar Singh (55) were killed. A local scribe who was covering the protest, Raman Kashyap (32), was also mowed down by the speeding SUVs. Several others were injured. The outraged farmers allegedly lynched to death two BJP workers, Shubham Mishra and Shyam Sunder, and a driver Hari Om Mishra, in retaliation after the vehicles came to a halt. The farmers alleged that Monu and some of his aides fled into the fields on foot to escape the enraged mob and even fired shots at them and in the air with weapons. Initially, farmers had even alleged that one of the four farmers killed Gurvinder Singh, had been shot dead by Monu as he tried to escape. However, two autopsy reports of Gurvinder did not show any bullet injuries.

Monu and his father Teni maintained that at the time of the violence in Tikonia, Monu was in Banveerpur village overseeing the wrestling competition. However, in a 5,000-page chargesheet filed in court, the Special Investigation Team probing the incident last year said that Monu was present at the site of the violence. The SIT described it as a “pre-planned conspiracy.”

Based on oral, documentary and scientific evidence, the SIT also said that after running over the farmers, the accused including Monu ran towards the sugarcane fields while firing from their weapons.

Last year, the state government counsel while appearing in the HC, informed the court that the forensic report of the weapons recovered from the accused men corroborated the prosecution version that indiscriminate firing was done from the weapons. While Monu fired from his revolver, his rifle was used by co-accused Nandan Singh Bisht, said the SIT chargesheet. Another accused Sumit Jaiswal, who was captured on video alighting from the Thar SUV after the vehicle lost control, allegedly fired from an illegal arm. The SIT also recovered one pistol from accused Ankit Das, the grandson of former UP chief minister Babu Banarasi Das; one pump action gun 12 bore from Kale and one revolver from Satyam Tripathi.

Nachattar Singh’s son Mandeep Singh, a paramilitary jawan serving on the borders, says even his family is yet to get the government job promised to them. He hoped his brother would get the job.

“We have not got the government job yet or understood its process,” he said.

Also read | ‘Time Wasted Due to VVIP Visits’: ADG Prashant Kumar on Lakhimpur Kheri Probe

After joining work as an SSB jawan in early 2021, Mandeep did not get to see his father till he was forced to leave his post in Almora late on October 3, 2021 and reach Tikonia the following day to attend the funeral.

Mandeep, 27, is unhappy that Monu is out on bail, as he fears it could influence the trial.

There were two FIRs registered in the incident. One by the farmers against Monu and others. The second by Sumit Jaiswal, a BJP worker, also an accused in the first case, against unknown farmers. The SIT had arrested 13 accused persons in the FIR lodged over the killing of the farmers. The name of the 14th accused Virendra Shukla was added to the chargesheet under section 201 (causing disappearance of evidence). In May 2022, the HC said the SIT charge-sheet would reveal overwhelming evidence against the accused persons for the “commission of the offence, which has been termed cruel,diabolic, brutal, barbaric, depraved, gruesome and inhuman.” The court had also noted that had Teni not made provocative statements, the Tikonia incident might not have taken place.

In the second FIR regarding the murder of the BJP workers, charges have been framed against four farmers, Guruwinder Singh, Kamaljeet Singh, Gurupreet Singh and Vichitra Singh.

So far, only ten witnesses have appeared in the case against the farmers while in the FIR against Monu and others, only four witnesses have been examined, said lawyers associated with the trial. The fifth witness is likely to be examined in court on October 13.

The body of one of the farmers in Tikonia, Lakhimpur Kheri being taken away on October 4, 2021 a day after four farmers were mowed down. Photo: Omar Rashid.

Pawan Kashyap, 32, brother of scribe Raman Kashyap, says it may be difficult to get justice till Teni remains a minister. “He is a powerful man and is moneyed. Justice bows to power. Till he is a minister in the government, it will be difficult for us to get justice,” says he.

Pawan, who is also a paraikor in the case, alleged the hearings are held under a tense atmosphere where people from the rival side gather in court in large numbers. This intimidates the witnesses, he alleged. “When the witness sees 15-20 people in court, some with arms, even they get scared for their lives.”

Raman’s death has made life difficult for the Kashyap family. His father stopped working after he got a heart ailment in 2016. Raman’s youngest brother Rajat Kashyap was running a small shop in Nighasan till COVID-19 forced it to be shut down. Compounding the misery for the family, Rajat died in March this year after suffering from blood cancer. He left behind a young child. Raman himself left behind two young children, a son (5) and daughter (12).

Pawan is now the sole breadwinner in the family, putting him under tremendous pressure.

“Our existence has been jolted,” Pawan says, stressing that whenever he steps out of his house his family is worried about his safety. “’If something happens to me, what will happen to the three kids’, my family wonders,” he says.

Vinay Kumar Singh, a lawyer for the deceased farmers, says the trial is in evidence stage. Singh alleges that there was pressure being put on their witnesses. “There is an attempt to break our witnesses,” said Singh. For instance, he said that in a recent hearing, when he felt that his witness, whose identity he did not reveal, was under pressure, he got an adjournment saying that the witness’ mental condition was not right that day.

Shailendra Kumar Gaur, lawyer for accused Ankit Das, however, refuted the allegations that the accused side were pressuring the witnesses. “No, no, nothing like that. They (Ankit Das, Monu and others) appear in court only when there is a hearing. Otherwise, they stay out of the state,” he said.

The Supreme Court in January while granting interim bail to Monu had asked him to stay out of UP and the NCT. Recently, the court modified its order to allow him to stay in NCT to take care of an ill family member. The Lakhimpur Kheri trial judge earlier this year informed the SC that the trial against Monu and his co-accused would take a minimum of five years to be completed. The case against Monu would have 208 oral witnesses, 171 documentary evidence, 17 scientific evidence, 7 physical evidence and 24 forensic science laboratory reports, the prosecution proposed in the chargesheet.

The bereaved farmers are mentally-prepared for the long-haul. However, Satnam Singh regrets the fact that Teni is still a minister and was not charged as a co-accused. He says the bodies of the four farmers, which were kept on display at the site of the incident the day after, should not have been cremated until Teni faced action. It must be recalled that amid a tense atmosphere in Tikonia where farmers had gathered with the bodies to start a long-drawn protest, Bharatiya Kisan Union leader Rakesh Tikait had mediated between the government and the enraged farmers to diffuse the tension.

Had the bodies been kept at the site for just a day longer, the government would have been under pressure to act against Teni and force him to resign, says Satnam, stressing that the farmer unions did not consult them before taking the call.

The Wire dialled the phone numbers of district Magistrate Kheri Mahendra Bahadur Singh to ask him about the jobs promised to the kin of the farmers killed in Tikonia. But he could not be reached.

Two Years After Lakhimpur Kheri Killings, Three Issues from Rural India That Can’t Be Ignored

A fact-finding report published by rights activists points out that unresolved agrarian questions, distortions of democracy, and the culture of impunity in rural India are the reasons why such violence took place in the UP town.

Two years since the Lakhimpur Kheri incident, the victims are yet to get justice, but the main accused, Ashish Mishra, the son of Bharatiya Janata Party leader (BJP) and Union minister Ajay Mishra, is out on bail, highlighting the depredations that mark rural India. Four farmers, a journalist, and three BJP workers were killed in the incident. Of all the planned and obstructionist violence against the farmers’ movement, none is as reprehensible and shocking as the massacre at Lakhimpur Kheri.

In their comprehensive, fact-finding report, Tekunia Lakhimpur Kheri Massacre, democratic rights activists from several organisations highlight details of the incident, the socio-economic background of the region, and its political culture. What stands out are three key dimensions – the unresolved agrarian questions, the distortions of democracy, and the culture of impunity – which coalesce to render our democratic apparatus, its structures, processes, and culture ineffective against the rising tide of ‘electoral authoritarianism’ in which violence against innocent citizens is legitimised.

Unresolved land issues

What the authors detail about the region that is underdeveloped economically and socially (with all its socio-economic parameters below the national average) also encapsulates the fall-out of the unresolved land questions. As part of the ecologically rich Tarai region, in which Sikh farmers were encouraged to settle and render productive, there are now economic and political tensions as to who is the ‘outsider’ and who the ‘insider’. That such a region manifests all the key features of agrarian distress (over-indebted farmers, inadequate farm incomes, exhausted lands, etc.) also highlights the failure of the current dominant model of agriculture.

Most of the farmers who had gathered at the site of the massacre were supporters of the farmers’ movement led by the Samyukt Kisan Morcha, and were seeking solutions to the myriad problems that they faced and which would have been exacerbated with the now-repealed three farm laws.

Also read: The Lakhimpur Kheri Incident Didn’t Occur by Chance, it Was a Long Time Coming

Distortions of democracy 

The second dimension that the report brings to the fore is that of the distortions of democracy which have been built on the fact that as a nation we have consolidated what Ambedkar cautioned against: the deployment of an electoral or political democracy without the indispensable and important economic democracy. That the minister of state for home affairs, Ajay Mishra or ‘Teni’, holds a “janta adalat (people’s court)” at his house, and is the local, wealthy patron who has been elected by impoverished rural citizens indicates how a ‘patron-client’ culture constitutes the foundation on which patronage and pelf, protection and exploitation form two sides of the coin of our rural democracy.

Indian Youth Congress members shout slogans during a protest demanding the immediate arrest of Ashish Mishra, accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence, near Union home minister Amit Shah’s residence in New Delhi, October 9, 2021. Photo: PTI/Kamal Singh

Combining muscle power with legal and illegal political and economic transactions, elected leaders ride on predatory capitalism to co-opt customary institutions and transactions. That the regional sport form of wrestling or dangel, once a community-based physical prowess that was a form of recognition and entertainment for a rural culture, is now within the ambit of the organising strength of politicians indicates the extent to which such collective and community activities have been subverted and subordinated to become sites and processes for political big-manship.

Ajay Mishra’s rise and rise to unlimited power resulted from such a configuration. The report provides a summative portrait of the man: a bully who posed as an arbitrator of justice, primarily because democracy’s own institutions especially that of the police and judiciary are out of reach of the average citizen, whose wealth grew unbounded into multiple crores, who flaunted the symbols of power and status (including expensive cars), and who was repeatedly elected despite a record that shows no contribution to his constituency, and whose son had aspirations to contest for the forthcoming assembly elections.

The fact-finding report reproduces a photograph of the primary health centre at Tikunia, a neglected set of buildings amidst slush, weeds and waste. That this is the state of a health centre during the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic speaks volumes for the state of underdevelopment in the region. Such distortions of democracy have also laid the foundations for a culture of impunity in which gross criminal and civil violations are not made accountable to the laws of the state or to the moral strictures of society. That Ajay Mishra is accused of murdering his political opponent in his very first election at the Zilla Panchayat level, but is able to be exonerated and then elected repeatedly to the parliament is a record of the travesty of not only justice but also that of humanity and democracy.

Also read: In Lakhimpur Kheri, BJP Proves India Has No Rule of Law Today

As a minister of state for home affairs, Mishra was able to threaten farmers in public and then, despite clear evidence and a report by a special investigation team (SIT) that implicates him and his son (now out on bail) for the massacre at Lakhimpur Kheri, continues to hold one of the highest offices in the nation, makes a mockery of not only our administrative system but also of the BJP’s disdain for any moral accountability to its citizens.

The Lakhimpur Kheri massacre will be a litmus test case for the judiciary to deliver justice and for the farmers’ organisations to persist in their assertion for justice. Its key learning will be that violence is now both a means and an end for political power and that the vehicle for such impunity is our compromised democracy and a culture of subordination among citizens. Even the state apparatus becomes an instrument of such violence.

This, the report notes, is evident in the misinformation that the police provided to the farmers, the enforced cordoning of the protest site at Tikunia into a narrow strip that provided no escape for the speeding, killing vehicles, and the mystery of the death of one BJP worker who was alive when handed over to the police but was later found dead.

As a planned massacre of innocents by powers that assumed they were beyond accountability, Lakhimpur Kheri will be the new ground in which the strength of the farmers’ movement and their assertion for the rights of farmers and for democracy will stand to be tested. All kudos to the Samyukt Kisan Morcha for continuing to seek justice for the victims.

Let their perseverance be a way of asserting our democratic rights and of honouring the memories of all the victims of the massacre.

Remembering farmers Nachattar Singh, Daljit Singh, Gurvinder Singh, and Lovepreet Singh, BJP workers Shyam Sundar Nishad, Hari Om Mishra, and Shubham Mishra, and journalist: Raman Kashyap.

A.R. Vaasavi is a social anthropologist based in Karnataka.

‘Lakhimpur Kheri Trial Could Take Up to 5 Years’: Uttar Pradesh District Court Tells SC

The apex court had asked for the district court’s report while hearing Union minister Ajay Mishra’s son Ashish’s bail application. Ashish had sought bail on the grounds that the trial will not end soon.

New Delhi: The Lakhimpur Kheri trial involving Union minister Ajay Mishra’s son will “take at least five years to complete,” a district court in Uttar Pradesh told the Supreme Court.

Four farmers were killed on October 3, 2021, after a vehicle connected with Mishra’s son, Ashish, ran them over. In the violence that ensued, four more people, including a journalist, died.

The apex court had asked for the district court’s report while hearing Ashish Mishra’s bail application. Ashish had sought bail on the grounds that the trial will not end soon.

Hindustan Times has reported that a bench of Justices Surya Kant and V. Ramasubramanian said: “The report says the trial will take at least five years as there are more than 200 witnesses.”

India Today has reported that the report by the the additional sessions judge had it that there are 171 documents and 27 forensic science laboratory (FSL) reports in the case.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan had appeared for the victims’ families and argues that the accused have enormous influences and should not be given bail till prime witnesses are examined.

The bench appeared unlikely to grant this, and said, “The larger issue has to be kept in mind. Any timelines fixed may cause serious prejudice to the prosecution.”

Also unenthusiastic about Bhushan’s request for day-to-day trials were senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Siddharth Dave, appearing for Mishra.

“How long should someone be kept inside? Keeping him indefinitely, will it not be pre-judging his guilt?” the Supreme Court had said earlier.

The Allahabad high court in May 9 last year denied bail to four accused men in the case, noting that the incident might not have happened had Union minister and Bharatiya Janata Party leader Ajay Mishra not made the alleged utterances earlier.

Addressing a public gathering on September 25, 2021, Ajay Mishra had told farmers (who were demonstrating across the country against the three agricultural laws, which were eventually withdrawn) to “discipline” themselves. “Or else we will discipline you. It will only take two minutes,” he said.

Lakhimpur Kheri Case: SC Issues Notice to UP Govt on Ashish Mishra Bail Plea

The top court was hearing Mishra’s challenge of a July 26 order of the Allahabad high court in which he had been denied bail.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday, September 6, sought a response from the Uttar Pradesh government on a plea filed by Ashish Mishra, son of Union Minister Ajay Mishra, seeking bail in a case related to Lakhimpur Kheri violence in which eight persons had died.

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court had on, July 26, rejected Mishra’s bail plea.

His plea challenging the high court order came up for hearing before a bench of Justices Indira Banerjee and M.M. Sundresh.

“We are issuing notice,” the bench said and posted the matter for hearing on September 26.

On October 3 last year, eight people were killed in Lakhimpur Kheri during violence that erupted when farmers were protesting against Uttar Pradesh deputy chief minister Keshav Prasad Maurya’s visit to the area.

Also read: The Lakhimpur Kheri Incident Didn’t Occur by Chance, it Was a Long Time Coming

Four farmers were mowed down by an SUV in which Ashish Mishra was seated, according to the UP Police FIR.

Following the incident, the driver and two BJP workers were allegedly lynched by angry farmers.

A journalist also died in the violence that triggered outrage among opposition parties and farmer groups agitating over the Union government’s now-repealed agricultural reform laws.

During the hearing before the apex court, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Mishra, referred to the incident and said the man who had lodged one of the FIRs in the matter had said that the accused was sitting in the vehicle and he was not driving it.

He said that driver of the car was physically pulled out of the vehicle and was assaulted along with two others and they died.

“The man who lodged that report saying that I (Mishra) was in the car and I ran away shooting in the air etc. ultimately said that he was not an eye-witness,” Rohatgi said.

He told the bench that Mishra was earlier granted bail in the case as there was no direct allegation that he drove the car and mowed down people.

The senior advocate said that later, the complainant side had come to the apex court and the bail granted to Mishra was cancelled.

On April 18 this year, the top court cancelled the bail granted to Mishra in the case and asked him to surrender in a week, saying the ‘victims’ were denied “a fair and effective hearing” in the Allahabad high court which adopted a “myopic view of the evidence”.

It had remanded the bail application for fresh adjudication “in a fair, impartial and dispassionate manner, and keeping in view the settled parameters” within three months after taking note of relevant facts and the fact that the victims were not granted a complete opportunity of being heard.

(PTI)

‘Sack Ajay Mishra; Release Jailed Farmers’: Demands That Echoed the 75-Hour Agitation in Lakhimpur

The Wire spoke to farmer leaders about their 75-hour-long protest. They believe that the Union as well as the state government has betrayed them.

Lucknow: A farmers’ agitation in Uttar Pradesh’s Lakhimpur Kheri district, seeking the removal of Union minister Ajay Kumar Mishra and a law guaranteeing minimum support price (MSP) among other demands, was called off Saturday, August 20. The agitation was called off after top district officials met the protesters.

During the 75-hour agitation, which started on August 18, the leaders also met the four jailed farmers who were incarcerated in connection with the Lakhimpur Kheri incident, All India Kisan Sabha secretary Mukut Singh told The Wire.

This was the first time the local administration allowed the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) leaders to meet them in jail.

While addressing a gathering of farmer leaders on August 18, Bharatiya Kisan Union leader Rakesh Tikait said: “The country is ready to fight a long battle.”

The agitation was being held at Mandi ground, Lakhimpur, under the aegis of the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM).

The Wire spoke to farmer leaders about their 75-hour-long protest. They believe that the Union as well as the state government has betrayed them.

Also read: Lakhimpur Kheri Protest: Tikait Asks Farmers to Prepare for Nationwide Agitation

The farmer leaders blamed the Uttar Pradesh government for not paying any ex-gratia to the injured farmers so far. They also expressed concerns over the Bharatiya Janata Party government’s policies which are making farming difficult in the country. Apart from that, they demanded Union minister Ajay Mishra’s resignation from his post.

Political analyst Yogendra Yadav also demanded Mishra’s resignation and expressed his apprehension that Ajay Mishra could use his political clout to influence the investigation and protect his jailed son, Ashish.

Tejinder Singh Verk, a farmer leader, also asked, “Why has Prime Minister Modi not sacked his minister until now?” He added that in the government’s constituted panel on MSP, the majority of the members are from the BJP-affiliated groups.

He added that the UP government vowed to pay compensation to the injured farmers, however, so far not even a single penny has been given to them.

Gurmeet Singh, a farmer, also said that Ajay Mishra’s position as the Union minister could influence the investigation in this case.

Eight persons, including four farmers and a journalist, were killed on October 3 last year after they were run over by a car that was allegedly part of a convoy of vehicles in which the Ajay Mishra’s son was travelling. At least twelve people were severely injured in the incident.

The Union minister’s son, Ashish, was arrested for his alleged role in the Lakhimpur violence. He was released on bail in February this year, and was in April brought back to jail after he surrendered.

Talking about the Electricity Amendment Bill 2022, Singh claimed that the government wants to hand over the power sector to private firms to end the subsidies to farmers. He said that farmers are opposing this Bill as the government did not consult them. They believe the Bill would lead to a hike in power tariff.

Another farmer, Baljinder Singh, expressed disappointment over the arrest of farmers in connection with the Lakhimpur incident. He claimed that the farmers had not hit anyone, and added that they were defending themselves from Ashish Mishra and his aides.

“We demand that the Yogi Adityanath government release the farmers who are in jail allegedly for killing BJP members and a driver,” he said.

Dilbagh Singh, who is a farmer from Lakhimpur, said that besides national issues, the protest is also about the local agrarian crisis. He said that several sugarcane farmers are yet to be paid their dues. Even in Lakhimpur, many big mill owners have not paid the farmers, which has caused financial troubles for them, he added.

UP: Farmer Leader, a Key Witness in Lakhimpur-Kheri Violence Case, Shot At

Dilbag Singh did not sustain any injuries in the attack.

New Delhi: Farmer leader Dilbag Singh, who is a witness in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case, was shot at by unidentified men in Uttar Pradesh late on Tuesday night. He escaped unhurt and police have begun an investigation into the incident.

According to news agency PTI, the attack took place Tuesday night when Singh – the Bhartiya Kisan Union (Tikait) district president – was returning home from Aliganj-Muda road in the Gola kotwali area in his car. Bike-borne assailants opened fire at the vehicle. Singh did not sustain any injuries in the attack.

Singh is among the witnesses in the Tikunia violence of October 3, 2021 in which four farmers and a journalist were mown down by a car that was allegedly part of the convoy escorting Ashish Mishra, Union minister Ajay Mishra. The younger Mishra was arrested in connection with the incident.

Three other people, some of them BJP members, were killed in retaliatory violence by the farmers, according to the police.

According to Dainik Bhaskar, two other witnesses in the Lakhimpur-Kheri violence case have also been attacked in the past.

Talking to PTI over the phone, the BKU leader said the miscreants punctured a tyre of his SUV owing to which he had to stop the vehicle.

“The assailants attempted to open the doors and windows of the SUV. When failed, they fired two shots at the window pane of the driver’s side,” he said.

Singh said he was driving the SUV and was alone.

He said sensing the intentions of the attackers, he folded the driver’s seat and bent down towards the floor.

Singh said he had sent his official gunman (provided to him by the district administration) on leave because his son had suddenly fallen ill on the day.

He lodged a complaint with the Gola kotwali police soon after the attack.

He added that he had also informed BKU-Tikait spokesperson Rakesh Tikait about the incident. Tikait was attacked at a press conference in Bengaluru on May 30, while black ink was also smeared on his face.

Tikait was one of the prominent leaders who led the charge against the Centre’s farm laws, which were repealed by parliament in November 2021. Many farmer groups opposed the laws saying they would pave the way for the corporatisation of agriculture. The Lakhimpur Kheri violence, which occurred on October 3, 2021, took place as farmers were participating in a protest against Ajay Mishra and other BJP leaders.

Meanwhile, additional superintendent of police (ASP) Arun Kumar Singh told PTI that on the complaint of Dilbag Singh, an FIR under appropriate sections of IPC had been lodged.

He said forensic teams had been sent to the spot to examine the vehicle and the crime scene and collect evidence.

He further said police were investigating the case and efforts were on to identify the attackers.

The ASP added that the BKU-Tikait district president sent his gunman on leave on his own without intimating the senior police authorities. “If the matter of leave to his gunman had been intimated to us, we would have provided him another gunman as an alternative arrangement,” he said.

(With PTI inputs)

‘Lakhimpur Kheri’ Might Not Have Happened if Ashish Mishra Hadn’t Made ‘Utterances’: HC

Justice Singh of the Allahabad high court was referring to the Union minister’s threat that he would “discipline” agitating farmers “in two minutes”. In protest, farmers gathered at Lakhimpur Kheri on October 3.

New Delhi: The Allahabad high court on Monday, May 9 denied bail to four accused men in the case of the Lakhimpur Kheri violence last year, noting that the incident might not have happened had Union minister and Bharatiya Janata Party leader Ajay Mishra not made alleged utterances earlier.

Four farmers were killed on October 3 after a vehicle connected with Ajay Mishra’s son, Ashish, ran them over. In the violence that ensued, four more people, including a journalist, died. 

The bench of Dinesh Kumar Singh was hearing the bail applications of four accused in the case: Lavkush, Ankit Das, Sumit Jaiswal and Shishupal, Live Law reported.

During the hearing, the court pulled up an allegedly inflammatory speech made by Ajay Mishra a few days prior to the incident. The court said that if the minister had not made the alleged statement, the incident might not have taken place.

“Political persons holding high offices, should make public utterances in a decent language considering its repercussions in the society. They should not make irresponsible statements as they are required to conduct themselves befitting their status and dignity of high office which they hold,” Live Law quoted Justice Singh as observing orally.

“As submitted, this incident might not have taken place if the Union minister of state for home did not make alleged utterances,” Justice Singh said.

Addressing a public gathering on September 25, 2021, Ajay Mishra had told farmers (who were demonstrating across the country against the three agricultural laws, which were eventually withdrawn) to “discipline” themselves. “Or else we will discipline you. It will only take two minutes,” he said.

The protesting farmers had taken objection to the minister’s threat, which had led them to organise a peaceful protest in Lakhimpur Kheri on October 3. The site for the protest was also consequently fixed near a helipad where Haryana deputy chief minister Keshav Prasad Maurya was set to land on that day.

Also read: The Lakhimpur Kheri Incident Didn’t Occur by Chance, it Was a Long Time Coming

Moreover, the court said it was “intrigued” by the fact that a dangal (wrestling event) had been organised there on October 3, even though Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) was in place in the region.

Justice Singh was referring to a purported wrestling event which Ajay Mishra and his son, Ashish – the main accused in the case – claimed to have attended from 11 am on the morning of October 3 and which they had invited deputy chief minister Maurya to.

Maurya did not land at the helipad as planned and the protesting farmers were not immediately apprised of the deputy chief minister’s change of plans. 

Maurya was the ‘chief guest’ of this event, which further bemused Justice Singh in the present case. Justice Singh said it was “unbelievable” that the deputy chief minister would not have been aware that Section 144 had been imposed in the area.

While denying bail to the four accused, the court noted that all of them, as well as Ashish Mishra, belong to influential political families and thus the apprehension that they may interfere with the course of justice, tamper with evidence or influence witnesses, could not be ruled out at this stage.

While Ashish Mishra had been granted bail by the Allahabad high court on February 10 this year and was subsequently released from prison, the Supreme Court on April 18 cancelled Mishra’s bail, saying that the families of those killed during the October 3 incident – who had sought to intervene in Mishra’s bail plea – had not been adequately heard.

Chastising the Allahabad high court for its “tearing hurry” to grant Mishra bail and they way it set aside established judicial precedents, a bench of Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana and Justices Hima Kohli and Surya Kant had set aside the court’s bail order and sent the matter back for fresh consideration.

The court had also asked Ashish Mishra to surrender to the police.

Lakhimpur Kheri: BJP Minister’s Son Ashish Mishra Surrenders After SC Sets Aside Bail

The Supreme Court had cancelled the bail granted to Ashish Mishra and asked him to surrender in a week.

New Delhi: Union minister Ajay Mishra’s son Ashish Mishra on Sunday, April 24 surrendered at a local court in Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh, days after the Supreme Court cancelled his bail in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case.

“Ashish has surrendered in the court. We were given a week’s time but as Monday was the last day, he surrendered a day ahead,” Ashish’s counsel Awadesh Singh told PTI. Jail superintendent P.P. Singh said Ashish will be kept in a separate barrack at the jail due to security reasons.

The Supreme Court had cancelled the bail granted to Ashish Mishra and asked him to surrender in a week.

Eight people were killed in Lakhimpur Kheri during the violence that erupted when farmers were protesting against Uttar Pradesh deputy chief minister Keshav Prasad Maurya’s visit to the area on October 3 last year.

Four protesting farmers were mowed down allegedly by cars owned by Mishra carrying Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) workers.

Later, police had arrested Ashish in the case. However, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court had on February 10 granted regular bail to him.

According to a New18 report, the high court had reportedly said that the first information report in the case wrongly framed Ashish Mishra for the role of firing at protestors since no firearm injury was found on the bodies of the deceased.

The court, in its order, had further said, “…There might be a possibility that the driver tried to speed up the vehicle to save himself, on account of which, the incident had taken place.”

On April 18, the Supreme Court set aside the Allahabad high court order, granting bail to Ashish, saying that the victims were denied “a fair and effective hearing” in the high court, which adopted a “myopic view of the evidence”.

(With inputs from PTI)