‘Lawless UP,’ Say Opposition Parties as Dalit Man Beaten to Death Over Rumour He Sold Daughter

Opposition parties have alleged that the five perpetrators of the Mainpuri violence were members of the rightwing Hindu organisation, Bajrang Dal.

New Delhi: The death of a Dalit man after he was lynched by alleged members of a rightwing organisation has sparked a row between Uttar Pradesh’s Adityanath-led BJP government and opposition parties that have alleged a spike in caste-based violence.

On Sunday evening, a vicious assault by five men led to the death, on Monday, of 45-year-old Sarvesh Diwakar at a hospital in Uttar Pradesh’s Mainpuri. Opposition parties have alleged that the five were members of the rightwing Hindu organisation, Bajrang Dal.

Police are unconvinced of the five men’s political affiliation.

The Mainpuri police released a statement urging people not to spread rumours while denying any Bajrang Dal links with the assault. “We have not established any connection of the accused men to any outfit so far. In the eyes of the law they are mere criminals. Please do not spread rumours,” the Mainpuri police said in the statement. 

Also read: Azamgarh: First Dalit Village Pradhan in 2 Decades Killed ‘to Send a Message of Fear’

Newspaper reports have claimed that Diwakar, a daily wage worker, was targeted by the five accused after rumours spread that he had sold off his daughter.

However, Diwakar’s acquaintances informed local reporters that he had merely sent his 16-year-old daughter to Noida to stay with her relatives and continue her studies from there after the pandemic and lockdown left Diwakar without any income.

Diwakar also sent his wife to another relative’s house in Kolkata, a reporter who covered the incident told The Wire. He added that the family had been struggling to survive because of lockdown restrictions. 

Police, however, could not confirm whether Diwakar’s assault was connected to the rumours against him. The video of his assault which went viral on social media shows five men kicking and slapping Diwakar on the terrace of his home. He appeared to plead for mercy. However, the mob continued to beat him until he was immobile. 

Police have claimed that they have already arrested four of the five involved in the crime.

Also read: Minorities, Dalits Most Harassed in Uttar Pradesh: NHRC

News of Diwakar’s death comes within two weeks of a video clip from Mainpuri itself going viral, where a Dalit widow and her partner were shown to be physically and verbally assaulted by upper caste men of the village. The couple’s heads were tonsured and they were garlanded with shoes.

Opposition parties have come out strongly against the state government in the aftermath of the recent incident. The Samajwadi Party shared the video clip of the assault and alleged that Bajrang Dal workers were the offenders.  


The Bahujan Samaj Party, viewed as a party of Dalits, refrained from directly implicating any organisation in the assault, but aimed their attack at the state government which has been making positive claims on the improvement of law and order, a perpetual concern in UP. 

BSP chief Mayawati pointed to an emerging trend in her tweet. “Yesterday in UP, Sarvesh Kumar, a Dalit, was beaten to death in Mainpuri and similarly Gobind Chauhan in Maharajganj, Rajveer Maurya in Shahjahanpur, Wasid in Bareilly, Sudhir Singh in Kushinagar and Vinod Garg (Brahmin) in Banda. Incidents of shooting, killing etc. are very sad,” Mayawati tweeted, adding that this exposed the lies in the tall claims made by the state government. 

Another incident of mob violence

An incident of mob violence emerged from Kushinagar district on Monday, leading to a greater political hue and cry about alleged lawlessness in the state. 

A viral video clip showed policemen in Kushinagar’s Rampur Bagra village in riot gear trying, and eventually failing, to stop a mob from beating a man with sticks. The police said that the man who was being beaten up had allegedly shot and killed a teacher, the motive of which is unclear at the moment. The man later died at a hospital. 

“The man tried to run out of the house after killing Sudhir Singh, but he saw people from the neighbourhood gathering outside. So, he went inside and climbed onto the roof. He fired a few shots with his pistol to scare away the crowd. Our police team reached the spot within a few minutes. While they were trying to apprehend him, the crowd turned violent and started attacking him, which resulted in his death,” the Kushinagar SP said.

The station-in-charge has now been suspended for negligence. 

Demand to Invoke SC/ST Act Rises in TN Wall Collapse Incident That Killed 17 Dalits

The 25-foot wall which collapsed is understood to have been built by a caste Hindu so that he would not have to look at a Dalit colony.

Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu: A wall that locals claim was built to separate Dalits collapsed early on Monday morning, killing 17 Dalits belonging to the Arunthathiar community of Nadur village in Mettupalayam.

Fifty-five-year-old Ramasamy says he will never forget what he saw early on Monday. At around 5 am, seeing murky water gushing out, he went around to check if there was any damage which was causing the flow. What he saw was bodies crushed under three houses entirely destroyed by the collapse of his neighbour’s massive 25-foot tall wall.

The wall was built behind a manor owned by a textile store owner. It fell due to incessant rains, on three houses at Kannapan Nagar.

“With help from neighbours, we started removing the dead bodies. All of them were daily wage labourers. Not even one could escape. All because of this wall which we have been complaining about for years,” says Ramasamy, voice constricted .

Beneath the debris that Ramasamy and others cleared, they found three children, three men and 11 women, from three families.

Kanappan Nagar, a colony in Nadur Village, Mettupalayam, has about 300 families belonging to the Arunthathiar community. They all live in tiled houses. The colony is built on a slopping plane, and on raised ground is the manor.

The house belongs to Sivasubramaniam who owns Chakravarthi Textiles, a famous retail store in Mettupalayam. Sivasubramaniam bought this plot eight years ago and while constructing this house, had raised the existing compound wall which was built using mud and was considered to be weak.

A view of Kanappan Nagar from the site of the wall collapse at Mettupalayam in Tamil Nadu. Photo: Sujatha S.

The compound wall was built of ‘karungal’ or basalt. Fearing for their safety, residents of Kannappan Nagar had raised objections and had also complained to authorities, all in vain.

Amidst all this is the inescapable fact that Sivasubramaniam constructed the wall so that he would not have to see a Dalit colony.

“The wall can be called ‘untouchability wall’ because the intention was only to avoid seeing us. We are Dalits and they are caste Hindus and rich, and did not even want to look at us. A few years earlier, a part of the previously built compound wall was partly destroyed and we complained about it. But unfortunately, when the current owner built this house he raised the wall and we couldn’t do anything about it. We had serious concerns of safety and we kept complaining to authorities and to the house owner, but all in vain,” questioned Arumugam, a resident of Kannappan Nagar.

Also read: Why Caste-Based Wrist Bands in Tamil Nadu’s Schools Must Be Banned

Their humiliation did not end there. Drain water from the house was allowed to flow into Kannappan Nagar. Residents also allege that the owner would never come out to talk to them and would let the dogs bark at them when they came to complain.

Sivasubramaniam was remanded in judicial custody for 15 days but the concerns raised by various rights organisations on the sections of the laws he was convicted under remains unanswered. Sivasubramaniam was initially charged under Section 304 (a) and the Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992.

Section 304 (a) says:

“Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both”.

Later his conviction was changed to 304 (ii) that deals with culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The demand raised by various organisations is that Sivasubramaniam should be tried under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Political parties and activists condemning the death are, however, divided on the opinion that the wall was an ‘untouchability wall’.

The debris of the destroyed houses at Mettupalayam in Tamil Nadu. Photo: Sujatha S.

D. Ravikumar, of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi political party, who raised the issue in Lok Sabha on Tuesday stated that though there is no clear cut definition for ‘wall of discrimination,’ the intent behind constructing such a high raised wall was indeed segregation.

According to Kathir, the founder of Evidence, an organisation working for Dalits, this case should be tried under the SC/ST Act. “Section 8 of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act says that if it is proved that the offence committed was a sequel to any existing dispute regarding land or any other matter, it shall be presumed that the offence was committed in furtherance of the common intention or in prosecution of the common intention or in prosecution of the common object. In other words, the intent of the owner was caste discrimination,” says Kathir.

Also read: Tamil Nadu: 2 Couples Among 5 Killed in Caste Violence Within 10 Days

I. Pandian of Witness for Justice states is of the same view. Pandian further feels that the provisions in the Act are clear. “Section 3 (b) states whoever not being a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe dumps excreta, sewage, carcasses or any other obnoxious substance in premises or at the entrance of the premises occupied by a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe can be punishable by law,” he adds.

Pandian feels that the wall may not be a physical evidence of untouchability but the intent is clear. “Even under Section 304 (a) under which Sivasubramaniam was booked, ‘negligence under what category’ is the question. Negligence because the people are Dalits? Action should be initiated taking into consideration the SC/ST Act in totality,” he says.

A vehicle clears the remains of the wall at Mettupalayam in Tamil Nadu. Photo: Sujatha S.

The National Commission for Scheduled Castes that visited Mettupalayam on Thursday, December 5,  to conduct an inquiry into the deaths has recommended invoking the SC/ST Act in the case to the state government.

L. Murugan, the Commission’s vice chairman, said, “The National Commission for Scheduled Castes headed by Ram Shankar Katheria visited Nadur village and conducted an inquiry. Based on our findings, the commission has recommended invoking  Sections 3-5 of the SC/ST Act to the state government. The commission has also recommended to provide additional compensation to the victims, that should be provided under the Act.”

The other side of the story is supplied by the residents of the co-operative colony where Sivasubramanian’s house is situated, who claim that there is no discrimination and that the wall was built only for “safety” purposes.

Besides all these allegations remain the fact that the authorities failed to take action when the residents of Kannapan Nagar complained about the wall. But according to a senior official in Mettupalayam Municipal Corporation, no permission was granted to build such a wall and building rules have been violated.

The remains of the wall were destroyed by revenue department officials based on an order from the district administration.

The pyres of some of the men, women and children killed in the Mettupalayam wall collapse. Photo: Sujatha S.

Sujatha S. is an independent journalist.

Ambedkar to Payal Tadvi: Codes of Discrimination Change But Dalits’ Nightmares Continue

Dalits who have been refused the right to education for centuries, have now gained it through the constitutional provision. But in the process they are subjected to constant harassment and humiliation.

I felt that I was in a dungeon, and I longed for the company of some human being to talk to. But there was no one. In the absence of the company of human beings I sought the company of books, and read and read. Absorbed in reading, I forgot my lonely condition. But the chirping and flying about of the bats, which had made the hall their home, often distracted my mind and sent cold shivers through me — reminding me of what I was endeavouring to forget, that I was in a strange place under strange conditions.

Many a time I must have been angry. But I subdued my grief and my anger through the feeling that though it was a dungeon, it was a shelter, and that some shelter was better than no shelter. So heart-rending was my condition that when my sister’s son came from Bombay, bringing my remaining luggage which I had left behind, and when he saw my state, he began to cry so loudly that I had to send him back immediately. In this state I lived in the Parsi inn, impersonating a Parsi.”

– Dr B.R. Ambedkar

B.R. Ambedkar. Credit: Wikimedia Commons

B.R. Ambedkar. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

The above is an excerpt took from the book Waiting for a Visa, an anthology of incidents that shaped Ambedkar’s life. Ambedkar was made to come back from London after his scholarship by the king of Baroda ended. Back in India in 1918, he was appointed as a probationer in the accountant general’s office by the king. After only 11 days, he was made to leave Baroda because he was constantly being humiliated by peons and other workers there. The floors of his office, which his colleagues believed had been rendered impure in the presence of an untouchable, were cleaned every day after he left.

The files he touched were not touched by others. The office assistants never listened to him. If work was humiliating, home was a nightmare. The above excerpt was written by Ambedkar recalling the terror he felt in a Parsi inn where he was staying in Baroda. Ambedkar posed as a Parsi as he knew he would not be given a place to stay in other hotels. Eventually, he was caught in his lie and was thrown out by goons. He was never treated as a man should be but “was reduced to his immediate identity and nearest possibility”.

Also read: It’s Time to Defang ‘Meritocracy’, an Argument That Claims Lives

“The value of a man was reduced to his immediate identity and nearest possibility. To a vote. To a number. To a thing. Never was a man treated as a mind. As a glorious thing made up of star dust. In every field, in studies, in streets, in politics, and in dying and living.”

– Rohit Vemula

This is an excerpt from the searing suicide note written by Vemula before he hanged himself. Vemula, a PhD student at the University of Hyderabad, committed suicide on January 16, 2016 after his fellowship amount of Rs 25,000 was suspended following a complaint filed against him by the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, a student’s body affiliated to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Vemula was accused of indulging in“casteist and anti-national” activities.

Ambedkar’s humiliation and Vemula’s suicide are separated by almost a century, but it is baffling to see how these two were made to go through the same struggles. After 72 years of Independence, India is still enslaved by the age-old cynical system of caste.

Dalits continue to be humiliated, threatened, harassed, lynched and killed.

The constitution of India promises to provide justice, liberty of thought and expression, and equality of status and of opportunity to all its citizens.  

Artists pay tribute to Rohith Vemula. Credit: PTI

Ambedkar and Vemula are separated by centuries but went through the same struggles. File image of artists painting a poster calling for justice for Vemula at a protest following his death. Photo: PTI

The statistics offered by various institutions prove otherwise. According to the National Crime Records Bureau, crimes against Dalits have risen by 25% between 2006 to 2016. Almost 99% of cases are pending police investigation. The conviction rate has also reduced by 2%.

Police also often refuse to file complaints in a number of cases, a fact which shows that the system of justice is futile for some. The paramount example of this is the dilution of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, by the Supreme Court.

While the number of Dalit killings increases day by day, the Supreme Court has diluted the act on the logic that the number of false cases has increased. The judiciary which is touted to be the guardian of the Constitution has failed to keep up the promise of justice given by the Constitution itself. These statistics compel us to ask a deeply disturbing question: Does the state recognise Dalits as citizens of India or are they outcastes in the eyes of the state also?

Incidents of caste discrimination in educational institutions in rural areas have been common, but institutions which are thought of as leading intellectual breeding grounds have also seen a surge in caste-based discrimination on campus. The case of Rohit Vemula is just a tip of the iceberg. Vemula’s suicide was followed by Muthukrishnan who was a PhD student at Jawaharlal Nehru University.

IIT Madras, science science, liberal arts, humanities, IIT Madras, National Education Test, senior research fellowship, junior research fellowship, MHRD, University Grants Commission, Department of Science and Technology, ATREE, Hyderabad Central University, March for Science, PhD scholars, stipend hike, K VijayRaghavan,

When discrimination is institutionalised, it kills upliftment. File image of the JNU administrative building. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Muthukrishnan, from Tamil Nadu, was found dead in his hostel room. Before killing himself, the wrote on Facebook, “When equality is denied, everything is denied. There is no equality in MPhil/PhD admission, there is no equality in viva-voce, there is only denial of equality, denying professor Sukhadeo Thorat recommendation, denying students protest places in ad-block, denying the education of the marginals”.

Also read: The Culture of Professional Colleges Failed Dr Payal Tadvi – Just as It Did Me

He was refused equality, he was refused the constitutional promise.

Dalit students have long been subjected to harassment but in these two incidents, it was institutionalised — a fact gleaned by observing the institutions’ reactions in the aftermath. After Vemula’s suicide, instead of strengthening the protection of marginalised students, the police, court and government were keen to prove that he was not from a Dalit community.

Muthukrishnan had been clear that he was discriminated against in the viva voce. In the recent case of Payal Tadvi, who was harassed by her seniors and committed suicide, humiliation after humiliation followed. She was told that she is only good to clean toilets. But the Indian Medical Association only vaguely acknowledged caste discrimination in medical education. The appointed investigative panel also submitted that Tadvi was harassed and ragged but held that there was no evidence of caste-based harassment.

In a sudden turn of events, Tadvi’s suicide notes were recovered from her phone and those turned the case. By not acknowledging the role of caste in these crimes, the institutions have ended up indirectly authorising them. 

When discrimination is institutionalised, it kills upliftment. The new India has seen a new code of discrimination. Dalits who have been refused the right to education for centuries, have now gained it through the constitutional provision. But in the process they are subjected to constant harassment and humiliation.

They are whispered, told and beaten to the agreement that they don’t belong “here”. This new code of discrimination has been in development for more than a decade. In a number of reports by Makepeace Sitlhou, a former campaigner with Amnesty International India, on The Wire gives us haunting statics of this new code. She starts with a report produced by a committee set up in 2007 by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences to look into the issue of caste discrimination on campus by teachers. As many as 84% of the Dalits students who were covered in the survey said that they have been asked about their caste either directly or indirectly by teachers during evaluation.

Also read: The Burden of Caste Annihilation Must Not Lie on Dalits Alone

Another report highlights that only 155 universities out of the 800 have cooperated with the UGC act on protecting oppressed students by adding a Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes redressal portal in their college website and by establishing separate committees to look into the issue. In June 2015, IIT Roorkee dismissed 73 students based on poor performance. Almost three-quarters of the students who were dismissed were SCs and STs. The National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights, which investigated the issue, said that the institution lacked facilities to support students from diverse backgrounds; it lacked English classes, summer classes and other remedial programmes.

Women members of Dalit Community carry a portrait of BR Ambedkar as they block the traffic during a protest in Ahmedabad on Wednesday against the assault on dalit members by cow protectors in Rajkot district, Gujarat. Credit: PTI

Dalits have regarded the Constitution crafted by Ambedkar as a sacred key to emancipation. File image of Dalit women carrying a portrait of B.R. Ambedkar at a protest in Ahmedabad against the assault on Dalits by cow vigilantes in Rajkot district of Gujarat. Photo: PTI

In all these years, Dalits have held the Constitution as “their” political document and have seen it as the path to emancipation. But every act of arrogance or cruelty and the state’s indifference towards it breaks this constitutional promise to Dalits.

It is time that we critically analyse the Constitution. Suraj Yengde in his book Caste Matters, discusses the constitutional limitations in the process of Dalit emancipation. He says, “Owing to the limited control of this institution, the Constitution has become synonymous to a grievance cell offering no immediate solutions”.

Dalits have to create a rhetoric which transcends linguistic, economic and intellectual barriers. The linguistic limitations of the Constitution are apparent and most Dalits do not even realise that they have a written set of rights to be claimed. This elitism of the Constitution makes it an ambiguous representation of Dalit rights. The recent conclusion of elections gives a clear representation of how Dalits have very little knowledge about their rights and therefore seem to have voted for a party whose very agenda strikes at the core of Dalit issues. 

Caste has always evolved to suit the change of times. It has taken on a new form now and the fight against it should also evolve. It is time that we bring forward a new theory of Dalitism which encompasses all Dalits and provides them with a common forum to fight for their rights. Until then, we must “educate, organise and agitate.”

E. Edhaya Chandran is pursuing post-graduate studies in political science at Madras Christian College.

High Acquittal in SC/ST Atrocities Cases Due to Failure of Police, Prosecution: Centre to SC

“It is misconceived and misleading to suggest that acquittal singularly takes place owing to either false cases or misuse of PoA provisions”.

New Delhi: Lack of proper probe and tardy prosecution, and not falsehood of cases, are largely to blame for the excessive acquittals under the Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act of 1989, a Central government affidavit informed the Supreme Court.

The high rate of acquittal, the government said, was “attributed to several factors like delay in lodging the FIR, witnesses and complainants becoming hostile, absence of proper scrutiny of the cases by the prosecution before filing the chargesheet in court, lack of proper prosecution of the case, long pendency of the trial, lack of corroborative evidence, etc., etc.”

According to a report in The Hindu, explaining the rationale behind the recent amendment in the Act, the government said that authorities had failed to provide justice to a marginalised section of society – one which has for centuries suffered social stigma, poverty and humiliation.

The 2018 amendment voided the March 20 apex court judgment allowing anticipatory bail to those booked for committing atrocities against members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The original Act had banned anticipatory bail.

Also read: The Dark Realities of the SC/ST Atrocities Act: An Ethnographic Reading

The Supreme Court’s judgment had triggered a widespread backlash with many alleging attempts to dilute an essential law. Writing for The WireFaizan Mustafa has argued that when cases are filed, “the most likely outcome is acquittal due to caste biases at every stage of investigation and trial.”

“The decision will surely have a chilling effect on reporting of already under-reported crimes against Dalits. The court has not only gone against its own earlier judgments but also re-written Section 18 of PoA which excluded anticipatory bail, and Section 154 of Code of Criminal Procedure which mandates that FIR is to registered in every case of cognizable offence.”

Several protests against the verdict saw a loss of life and damage to property, following which Centre filed a review petition in the apex court and amended the 1989 Act back to its original form. Several petitions were filed challenging the 2018 amendments arguing that parliament had “arbitrarily” decided to restore provisions struck down by the Supreme Court, however, the court refused to stay their implementation.

Also read: SC/ST Act: A Hostile Environment and an ‘Atrocious’ Interpretation

Government’s affidavit – filed in response to these petitions – stated that despite laws meant to protect SC/ST communities, there had not been a fall in the atrocities committed against them. “It is misconceived and misleading to suggest that acquittal singularly takes place owing to either false cases or misuse of PoA provisions”.

The 1989 Act, the government argued, “is the least which the country owes to this section of the society who have been denied several civil rights since generations and have been subjected to indignities, humiliations and harassment.”

In MP, Dalit Man Thrashed for Riding Motorcycle Past Village Head’s House

Over the last ten years, there has been a 66% growth in crimes against Dalits.

Tikamgarh: A 30-year old Dalit was allegedly beaten up for riding a motorcycle past the house of a sarpanch in a village here, the police said on June 25.

A video purportedly showing the incident has also gone viral on social media.

The police last night arrested the sarpanch of Dharampur village and four others in connection with the incident which occurred last week, Deri police post’s assistant sub-inspector (ASI) Ramsewak Jha said.

The victim, Dayaram Ahirwar (a Dalit), in his complaint alleged that on June 21, the village sarpanch, Hemant Kurmi, his brothers and one of their neighbours beat him up severely after objecting to his riding a motorcycle in front of their house, Jha said.

Ahirwar also stated that the accused told him that he should not have driven through the road in front of their house. Instead, he should have dragged the motorcycle without riding on it, the ASI said.

After beating the victim, the accused warned him not to repeat his action in future, the complainant told the police.

Two days after the incident, a video clip of the incident went viral on social media in which Hemant Kurmi was purportedly seen abusing and beating the victim along with the other accused.

Based on the victim’s complaint, the police arrested Hemant Kurmi, his brothers Vinod Kurmi, Munnu Kurmi and Aniruddh Kurmi, and their neighbour Dinesh Yadav, Jha said.

The accused were booked under relevant sections of the Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Indian Penal Code sections 341, 342 (wrongful confinement), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 294 (abuse in public) and 506 (criminal intimidation), he said.

What Lies Beneath the Alarming Rise in Violence Against Dalits?

Increasing parity between Dalits and the rest of society fosters the violence. But it’s also the antidote to caste crimes.

India has witnessed a sharp escalation in violence against Dalits in the past five years. In every year during this period, the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) registered a six to eight-fold upsurge in the rate of crimes committed against Dalits compared to the crime rate in the preceding five years – with violent incidents such as murder, assault and rape constituting the lion’s share of some 193,000 crimes against Dalits during this period.

Source: NCRB
Note: Upsurge in ant-Dalit crime rate is the ratio (expressed as decimal fraction) of the anti-Dalit crime rate in the 2011-16 period to the average crime rate during the 2007-11 period. The analysis uses a five-year (2007-2011) average as the baseline to avoid the possibility of an idiosyncratically low annual baseline figure inflating current crime rates. Crime rate is crimes per 100, 000 Dalits.

One reason for the increase in anti-Dalit crimes could be that more crimes are being recorded now than in the past in police stations, from where the NCRB aggregates the annual data. With increasing literacy among Dalits and greater awareness of rights, this is likely when more victims of crimes seek legal protection and redress by first officially recording the incidents with the police.

Yet this appears to account for only a part of the upsurge in the crimes against Dalits. There is a weak link between the rise in anti-Dalit crimes and the increase in Dalit literacy across India, and no relation to conviction rates in those crimes. Even if increasing literacy made more Dalit victims record crimes in police stations in the expectation of getting justice, it does not substantially justify the pattern in the increase in caste crimes.

Source: Census of India 2001, 2011; NCRB Note: Rise in anti-Dalit crime rate is the difference between the average rates of anti-dalit crimes in the 2011-16 period and the 2007-11 period; Increase in dalit literacy is the increase between 2001 and 2011; Conviction rate in anti-dalit crimes is the five-year average for the 2011-16 period.

Source: Census of India 2001, 2011; NCRB
Note: Rise in anti-Dalit crime rate is the difference between the average rates of anti-Dalit crimes in the 2011-16 period and the 2007-11 period; increase in Dalit literacy is the increase between 2001 and 2011; conviction rate in anti-Dalit crimes is the five-year average for the 2011-16 period.

Further, other crimes do not show such large surges during this period. Of note, instances of rape increased three-fold – and after the 2012 Delhi rape case, more women were reported to be recording crime in police stations. In comparison, a seven-fold upsurge in the anti-Dalit crime rate is of a magnitude that could not be attributed merely to increased filing of cases. Caste crimes increased not just on paper, but most likely also on the ground.

The important question then is: what accounts for the increased attacks on Dalits across India these past five years? The clues to answering the question lie, to a good measure, in how the society reacted to the progress Dalits made over the preceding years.

Sour losers?

Society’s reaction to Dalit progress can be gauged from the settings and details of several caste crimes. Whether it was the attack in Rajasthan where a Dalit groom rode a horse, in Odisha when Dalits decided to vote against the sarpanch’s candidate, in Bihar when a DJ played music at a Dalit wedding, the social boycott of Dalits in Andhra Pradesh for installing a statue of Ambedkar, or the alleged murder of a Dalit man in Kerala for marrying a woman from an affluent family, violence against Dalits seems to flare in places where social progress has led Dalits to narrow some historic caste differences and approximate what the traditionally privileged segments of the society see as their entitlements.

To be clear, Dalits have made significant social advancements – and been on horsebacks, married across caste and class lines, played music at their weddings, voted on their own and erected statutes to commemorate their political heroes – in several parts of the country without inviting violence upon them. Social progress in the country could be, and has been, free of physical violence.

Consider, for instance, the rise in literacy rates – a reliable indicator of the progress communities and societies make. Over the past decade, Dalit literacy rates increased in every Indian state. But not every state witnessed increased attacks on Dalits. In Assam and Jammu and Kashmir, Dalit literacy rose by as much as ten percentage points without any increase in caste violence, whereas Andhra Pradesh and Kerala witnessed anti-Dalit crime rates surge greatly with just five point rise in Dalit literacy. In some states, great surges in caste crimes happen with slight Dalit progress; in others, even great progress by Dalits do not lead to caste violence.

What seems to matter for caste violence is not so much the absolute progress of Dalits (or how much Dalits have improved their lot from their past conditions), as their relative progress – that is, how much has social progress helped the Dalits to catch up and narrow the gulf between them and the rest of the society.

Absolute progress among Dalits may cause resentment in some quarters, but it often does not incite great caste violence if the rest of society has meanwhile marched on to even greater prosperity. Dalit grooms may ride horses if the others now get to their weddings in luxury cars, so to speak. But if Dalit grooms take to horses when it is still what traditional elites see as their prerogative, it inspires not just resentment but also oftentimes violent backlashes.

Take the telling cases of Assam and Bihar. In Assam, the rise in Dalit literacy over the past decade was in step with the overall spread of literacy; the state witnessed hardly any rise in crimes against Dalits. In Bihar, where Dalit literacy accelerated ahead and reduced the great disparity that existed between the Dalits and the rest of the state, caste crime rate surged ten-fold.

There may of course be other factors that are related to the crime differentials in Assam and Bihar. But, these states are telling because they are part of a broader pattern: caste crimes have mostly surged in parts of India, where the pace of Dalit progress outstripped the pace of overall progress so as to bridge some socio-economic differences that historically marked off Dalits.

In fact, the greater relative progress by Dalits over the past decade, the greater the increase in caste crimes. That tendency holds across all Indian states (Fig. 3), barring Goa, Gujarat and Rajasthan where other factors heightened anti-Dalit crimes beyond what the relative Dalit progress could account for. The steep trendline in the graph as well as how closely the states are aligned to the line speak to the general relation between relative Dalit progress and increase in caste crimes.

Source: Census of India 2001, 2011; NCRB Note: Relative increase in Dalit literacy is the difference between the ratios (expressed as decimal fractions) of the Dalit literacy rate to overall state literacy rate in 2011 and 2001.

The starkness of that relation betrays a repugnant aspect of India’s development story: increasing social parity between Dalits and the rest of society goes hand in hand with increasing anti-Dalit violence.

More not less equality, and more

The solution to caste violence in the country, however, is not less but greater social parity. This becomes clear when we shift our focus from relative progress – or, the difference between the pace of Dalit progress and overall progress over the past decade – to social parity, or how much on par with the rest of society the Dalits are now.

Attacks on Dalits are fewer in parts of India where Dalits are at the same level of social development as the rest of society. Again, literacy rates as the index of development offer crucial pointers: the states where Dalit literacy rates are equal to the overall literacy also have low levels of crimes against Dalits. In fact, where Dalits are on par with the rest of society, caste crimes are truly one in a million.

Source: Census of India 2011; NCRB
Note: Dalit literacy on par with the rest is the ratio (expressed as decimal fraction) of the Dalit literacy rate to overall state literacy rate in 2011.

It turns out that Dalits catching up with the rest is the problem – at least for some people; but once they have caught up and are equal to the rest, the prospect for anti-Dalit violence recedes.

The current surge in anti-Dalit violence may then be just a passing phase. Beyond this phase, when Dalits become socio-economically indistinguishably from the rest of society, even in states where they now lag behind but are catching up, caste crimes should ebb. Social equalisation may be prone to violence; social equality is not.

Small comfort does this however bring to the many Dalits who are victims of caste violence in the meantime. Purposeful governments do not let development take its course; they diligently manage its ill effects by, in this case, making the process of social equalisation violence-free.

But, if the conviction rate in caste crimes – of 26% over the past five years – is anything to go by, Indian governments are failing its people, and attacks on Dalits will foreseeably continue before the situation turns for the better.

Anoop Sadanandan is author of Why Democracy Deepens, and tweets at @SadanandanAnoop.