Watch | Anti-CAA Women Protesters Enter Active Politics Ahead of 2022 UP Polls

The women activists say that they moved from activism to active electoral politics to intensify their political fight against the CAA.

Women dissenters who spearheaded the agitation against the citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) at the historical Ghanta Ghar in Lucknow in 2020 are now going to contest a political battle against the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) during the next assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh.

These women activists say that they moved from activism to active electoral politics to intensify their political fight against the CAA and to bring it into the centre of politics in the state.

Kafeel Khan’s NSA Detention Extended by Three Months

This the second time that the doctor’s detention has been extended after his detention for an alleged provocative speech against the contentious Citizenship (Amendment) Act in December 2019.

New Delhi/Lucknow: The Uttar Pradesh government has extended by three months the detention of physician Kafeel Khan under the National Security Act (NSA) for his alleged provocative speech during the anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) protests.

Khan was arrested in January for delivering the speech at Aligarh Muslim University on December 10, 2019. It is the second time his detention under the stringent law has been extended by another three months, this time beyond August 13.

Under the NSA, people can be detained without a charge for up to 12 months if authorities are satisfied that they are a threat to national security or law and order.

In an order dated August 4, 2020, the UP home department said the NSA was invoked against Khan on February 13, 2020, on the orders of the Aligarh district magistrate.

Also read: Jail, Attack on Family and NSA: Kafeel Khan is Paying the Price for Speaking Up

The matter was then sent to the advisory council, which in its report, said there are “enough reasons” to keep Khan in jail following which orders were given on May 6, 2020, to extend his detention under the NSA by three months, that is till August 13, 2020, the order said.

According to the report of the UP advisory council and the report obtained from Aligarh District Magistrate, governor Anandiben Patel, using the powers vested in her, directed that the detention of Khan be further extended by three months.

“As a result, Kafeel will remain in jail till November 13, 2020,” the order said.

Also read: Watch | When Will Justice Arrive for Dr Kafeel Khan and the ‘Bhima Koregaon’ Activists?

Khan was booked under Section 153A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

According to the FIR registered against him, his speech threatened to disrupt the harmony between the communities and was also likely to create a law and order situation.

Later, IPC Sections 153B (imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration) and 505(2) (statements creating or promoting enmity, hatred or ill will between classes) were added to the FIR, police said.

The doctor is currently lodged in Mathura jail.

Khan had hit the headlines for the first time in 2017 after the deaths of several kids due to lack of oxygen cylinders at Gorakhpur’s BRD Medical College, where he worked as a paediatrician. The doctor has alleged that an institutional failure had led to the deaths of the children. He has subsequently faced threats, cases and even his family members were attacked, which the doctor says is political vendetta on the part of the state government.

(With PTI inputs)

‘Show Your Sensitivity, Secure Justice for Dr Kafeel Khan,’ Priyanka Gandhi Tells Adityanath

Dr Khan is in detention for a speech he gave on the Aligarh Muslim University campus, at an anti-CAA protest.

New Delhi: On Thursday, Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra wrote to Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath about the detention of Dr Kafeel Khan, booked under the National Security Act over alleged hate speech. In her letter she said expects that he do his best to secure justice for him.

In her letter to the chief minister, the Congress General Secretary said Khan had served people selflessly in difficult situations, and has “has spent more than 450 days in jail so far”.

“I expect that while showing your sensitivity, you will try your best to secure justice for Dr. Kafeel,” she added.

Khan is in detention for an alleged inflammatory speech he gave on the Aligarh Muslim University campus during the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests.

Khan was arrested at Mumbai airport on January 29 in connection with the case registered at Aligarh’s Civil Lines police station under section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code. The section relates to promoting enmity between groups over religion and other differences.

On February 10, Khan was granted bail by the Allahabad High Court but not immediately released by Mathura Jail authorities. His family then moved court in Aligarh, claiming contempt of the HC order.

The court issued a fresh release order on February 13. But before it could be executed, the authorities invoked the National Security Act against him.

The paediatrician had earlier faced arrest following the deaths of over 60 children in a week at a government hospital in UP’s Gorakhpur in 2017.

About two years later, a state government probe cleared Khan of all major charges.

SC Stays Karnataka HC Order Granting Bail to 21 Detained During Mangaluru CAA Protest

A bench led by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde issued notice to the accused after taking note of the appeal filed by Karnataka government against the grant of bail by the high court.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the Karnataka high court order granting bail to 21 PFI members accused of indulging in violence at Mangaluru on December 19 during anti-CAA protests.

The high court had on February 17 granted bail to the accused on the pleas filed by Mohammed Ashik and 20 others hailing from Udupi and Dakshina Kannada districts of Karnataka.

A bench comprising Chief Justice S.A. Bobde and Justices B.R. Gavai and Surya Kant issued notice to the accused after taking note of the appeal filed by Karnataka government against the grant of bail by the high court.

“Issue notice. In the meantime, there shall be an ad-interim stay of operation of the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court if the respondents-accused are still in custody,” the bench ordered.

Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, appearing for the state government, assailed the high court order saying that as many as 56 policemen got injured during the violent protests.

“The rioters attacked the police station and set that ablaze,” the law officer said, adding that two persons died during that violent protests.

The high court, while granting bail, had said that the records produced indicate that the “identity of the accused involved in the alleged incident appear to have been fixed on the basis of their affiliation to Popular Front of India (PFI) and they being members of the Muslim community”.

Two persons received bullet injuries in police firing and they later succumbed at a hospital on December 19 last year as protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act turned violent in Mangaluru.

Police had lobbed tear gas shells and resorted to baton charge and fired in the air to disperse anti-CAA protesters in Mangaluru, as thousands of demonstrators had hit the streets in many cities and towns across Karnataka on December 19 last year defying prohibitory orders.

Interview: BJP Is on the Backfoot in Bengal, Says Activist Campaigning for Awareness on CAA-NRC

“I have reason to believe that the BJP feels unsettled by the growing consensus in our neighbourhood to boycott the NPR.,” said Kasturi Basu from the ‘Humans of Patuli’ project.

Unlike most other states, the campaign against CAA/NRC/NPR in Bengal, is playing out at various levels. Alongside the protest sit-ins by women, citizens’ groups have launched full-fledged campaigns to raise awareness amongst people about the implications of the Citizenship Amendment Act and how the CAA-NRC will impact their lives.

The Wire spoke to Kasturi Basu, an activist in the unique ‘Humans of Patuli’ project, running a door-to-door campaign in the area. Kasturi, who is also a founding member of the People’s Film Collective, tells us about the political and civil society intersections in Bengal and the challenges posed by the RSS/BJP in the state.

There is a lot of confusion amongst people about the two laws – one already notified, and the other proposed (CAA and NRC respectively,) – coupled with NPR that threaten to disenfranchise millions of people. Bengal, perhaps, is the only state where civil society organisations have launched a door to door campaign to create awareness about these laws. You are closely associated with this movement, at the centre of which is the Humans of Patuli project. How did the idea come into being?

The ‘Humans of Patuli’ initiative was formed in December 2019 by nearly fifty residents of the Basihnabghata Patuli Township and surrounding neighbourhood. We held several rounds of meetings among conscientious neighbours. Knowing what we knew, we strongly felt that the ordinary citizen could no longer sit passive. We knew that the need of the hour was run locality-specific sustained micro-level campaigns, taking every local resident into confidence.

A campaign that will bust lies being peddled by the government. If one were serious about stopping the NPR-NRC exercise in its tracks through direct democracy, there is no other alternative. Accordingly, the “NRC-r biruddhe Patuli Nagarik Udyog” (Patuli Citizens’ Initiative against NRC), a mass awareness and local action committee against the NPR-NRC-CAA citizenship matrix, was launched publicly in January 2020.

Also read: ‘Stand by Comment to Shoot Protesters Down’: Bengal BJP Chief Dilip Ghosh Speaks to The Wire

Let me also clarify that the NRC is not just proposed, but notified too, in the form of the gazette notification of NPR which has been announced to happen anytime between April and September 2020. The budget allocation for NPR has also been made and the NPR manual 2020 already published by the central government. So, in effect, the all India NRC notification has already been made. That the NPR is unambiguously the first step of the NRC is now known to everyone in Bengal. The NPR has no other legal basis outside of the NRC (also known as NRIC), as per the Citizenship Amendment Rules of 2003 and the recently issued gazette notification, read together. So, the NRC is already thrust upon us, and we have another month’s time left to reach out to every resident of Bengal with the all call of “Boycott NPR” given by almost every group and forum that is part of the movement.

Photo: Humans of Patuli

Are other independent groups doing such micro-level political work? Have political parties in Bengal reacted to the campaigns?

Our local initiative is among a whole spectrum of big and small citizen-led civil society initiatives that have been functioning in villages, towns, suburbs and cities of Bengal ever since the first draft of the Assam NRC came out in August 2018. The “Assam Sanhati Abhijan” was one of the earliest groups from Bengal in this movement.

Then the “Joint Forum Against NRC”, the “No NRC Movement” has come up as umbrella forums and networks of many smaller and localised groups. There are many local groups working specifically in districts of North Bengal. Besides these conglomerate groups, organisations like the Association for the Protection of Democratic Rights, the Bangla Sanskriti Mancha, the Park Circus Swadhinata Andolon 2.0, and several other new and old groups have done sustained and conspicuous work since 2018 and 2019.

Also read: ‘Land Bought in Blood’: Why Anti-CAA Protests at the Kolkata Derby Hold Meaning

So, I would say that it is truly a mass movement led by a spectrum of civil society organisations working in Bengal. Together, they have done crucial work in bringing mass awareness and clarity, helped formulate demands and educated and mobilised people of the state against the NRC-NPR-CAA regime. In fact, groups in Bengal have been pioneers of the ant-NRC movement in the whole country, much before the CAB became the CAA and the rest of India woke up to respond to the horror of it. This is only natural, because Bengal as a partition-surviving state with a huge refugee and Muslim population has the most to lose (along with Assam). We have highest stakes to avert a large scale displacement and disenfranchisement of our Bengali people. Bengal is next in the line of fire of the Modi-Shah regime.

Photo: Humans of Patuli

Before becoming a part of the Humans of Patuli group, another civil society group I am associated with, the People’s Study Circle, has been working since 2018 on developing movement literature – resulting in three popular Bangla booklets which have been used fairly widely by the movement – to clarify concepts and facts relating to the NPR, NRC and CAA and address concerns about the citizenship tangle in Bengal and Assam, and the Refugee question specific to Bengal. Many other little magazines and reading groups have likewise worked hard in preparing movement literature.

The political parties in Bengal have had their own campaigns which have learnt much from the clarity brought about by the civil society groups. There is reason for optimism in Bengal, since much everyone except the BJP and Sangh Parivar, are a part of the movement against the NRC. There have been many differences and debates which still persist in the movement. The TMC was initially declaring the NPR to be harmless, but later the mass movement built up clarity on the NPR, and now the TMC has changed its stance and opposes NPR.

The CPIM and other Left parties have had to face questions from the civil society led mass movement on their vacillations when it came to taking a principled stand vis-à-vis the Assam NRC, and after that, we have seen less justifications about the Assam NRC from them too. The civil society groups have played an effective rule to keep vigilance alive, and to be campaign pressure groups of sorts from below to influence the political parties.

Also read: Can Dilip Ghosh’s Foul Rhetoric Make Inroads With Bengal’s Bhadralok Gentry?

Despite large-scale exclusion of Hindus from Assam’s final NRC, there seems to be a perception that the citizenship laws will not affect Hindus. What has been your experience in Kolkata?

This is one of the biggest bluffs. Put bluntly, Namashudras and other Hindu refugees in Bengal have nothing to gain and everything to lose from the CAA, if you carefully go through the fine print of the Act and its preceding legalese. The BJP pretends to be a friend of the Hindu refugees, whereas the fact is that the 2003 Citizenship Amendment Act passed by the Atal Bihari Vajpayee led NDA government was the biggest body blow to Hindu refugees in the history of India.

In one clean sweep of the law, a whole generation of Hindu refugee children born in India were made into potential “illegal immigrants”. That law is the mother of all woes we are seeing today. The CAA 2019 sprinkles more salt on the wound of Hindu refugees. It tries to lure legitimate citizens into becoming asylum seekers with begging bowls. The BJP must be really demented to think that Hindu refugees who have once legally declared themselves to be Indian citizens under NPR, would, later on, revise their stand and declare themselves as asylum-seeking foreigners under CAA, if they happen to find that their names excluded from the NRC? And then they would run from pillar to post to prove their Bangladesh origins and proof of persecution and perceived fear leading to their migration?

This is the biggest insult and a cruel joke on the wounds of refugees. The BJP state president Dilip Ghosh has gone on record stating that Matuas and Gorkhas of Bengal are not citizens and need saving by the BJP – can you believe their audacity? The fact of the matter is that by the NDA governments own admission in the JPC report on CAB/CAA, only 25,447 Hindu refugees who already have long term visa may get benefits of the CAA, and the rest of the Hindus are just being bluffed and insulted.

Photo: Humans of Patuli

Our experience has been that no Hindus are enticed by the CAA. We haven’t met a single Hindu so far who is personally ready to apply via the CAA. We must understand the CAA for what it is – a communal dog-whistle ensconced in a fake refugee-friendly mask that falls off on the slightest prod.

Recently, your campaign was attacked by the BJP. Can you tell us what happened and how you countered their aggression?

Our local campaign has been attacked twice thus far. Just before our campaign went public, a woman student protester from our group, Sudeshna Dutta Gupta, was assaulted by BJP party workers and threatened with sexual and physical violence by BJP state president Dilip Ghosh, when she held a protest sign at his pro-CAA rally in Patuli. She filed an FIR against him.

On February 23, a gang of BJP men barged into my apartment, threatening me for my participation in the local anti-CAA protests. They had the audacity to bring in outsiders to come looking for me inside my apartment to teach me a lesson and threatened repeatedly to skin me alive. After they barged into our building, they tried to create a situation of confrontation on the road outside, but our neighbours, including elderly residents, told off the BJP workers and warned them not to provoke tensions. I have filed an FIR against the group of men who first trespassed into my apartment and then assaulted and threatened me.

Why did they attack me? I have reason to believe that the BJP feels unsettled by the growing consensus in our neighbourhood to boycott the NPR. We counter their aggression through the unity of our neighbours, through a sustained and informed campaign. Hindus and Muslims, we neighbours are in this fight to save our citizenship together.

Also read: During Modi’s Kolkata Visit, a Glimpse of Bengal’s Triangular Political Dynamics

Can there be a convergence between sit-in protests like the Park Circus protest, for instance, and campaigns like Humans of Patuli?

Most definitely. Many of our team members have already been regular participants in the Park Circus sit-in. The Park Circus organisers have also invited us to do a film screening in their sit-in, which will happen soon. I believe the way forward would be to boycott NPR committees in every neighbourhood of Bengal, which will be decentralised and yet closely coordinated to give out a single unified message to our fellow citizens. This way we can surely implement and ensure a boycott of the NPR. The spectrum of mass organisations in the movement must work together to ensure this coordination.

How deep is Bengal’s communal polarisation and the threat of communal violence?

The RSS and its many wings have been working overtime to create and sustain communal polarisation. They have been trying to pop up new gods, change traditional rituals and attack the pluralist religious cultures of Bengal. They pathetically try to communalise everything – by selectively projecting cases of gender violence, or attacking Muslim artists and writers who paint and write about Hindu scriptures and deities. It is their full-time job.

Kasturi Basu at a meet. Photo: Humans of Patuli

We all know about the deadly riots they engineered in Asansol and communal violence in the Naihati-Bhatpara-Halisahar jute belt area. The RSS has been trying to target Adivasi and Namashudra areas, with the schools like the informal Ekal Vidyalayas and more formal Saraswati Vidya Mandirs. Their IT cell and “intellectual cell” has been given the task of creating demographic anxiety among Hindus by peddling false and fake propaganda which has been busted time and again. So, they are preparing the ground for communal violence, at the drop of any excuse later on.

The ordinary people of Bengal at large have played a stellar role in thwarting and containing acts of communal violence. There has been increased communal polarisation if you look at the vote results of the 2019 general elections. But beyond electoral politics, they have not managed to create very deep polarisation. In our campaigns, we found out that ordinary people are overall disgusted with and sick of communal rhetoric overshadowing vital issues of lives and livelihoods.

We need to be eternally vigilant though, as we know the riots are often engineered before elections, to reap electoral dividends. After the CAA-NRC tangle, the BJP is on a backfoot in Bengal, and hence more desperate. The government and the police must play a vigilant role to thwart any such designs in the bud. Bengal needs a strong enforceable law to bring accountability for any kind of communal violence that threatens to damage our social fabric.

After Bernie Sanders Tweets About Delhi Riots, BJP Leader Threatens to Interfere in US Elections

The Ministry of External Affairs says these statement are aimed at “politicising” the issue.

New Delhi: For second day, top US Democrat lawmakers brought up the riots in Delhi and criticised US President Donald Trump for not showing “leadership” by raising it during his visit.

Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders tweeted on Wednesday night local time that Trump had failed to criticised the violence which racked Delhi, even as he was visiting. “This is a failure of leadership on human rights,” he posted on Twitter.

Sanders has recently won two major Democratic primaries at Nevada and New Hampshire and tied at Iowa.

BJP’s national general secretary B.L. Santhosh then tweeted to Sanders saying Santhosh or his party may interfere in the US elections. “How much ever neutral we wish to be you compel us to play a role in Presidential elections. Sorry to say so… but you are compelling us,” he tweeted. Santhosh later deleted it, but the remaining replies which tag both of them show that they are part of the same thread.

Meanwhile, Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said that India had “seen comments made by USCIRF [US Commission on International Religious Freedoms], sections of the media and a few individuals regarding recent incidents of violence in Delhi”.

“The brutal and unchecked violence growing across Delhi cannot continue,” USCIRF commissioner Anurima Bhargava had said. “The Indian government must take swift action to ensure the safety of all of its citizens.  Instead, reports are mounting that the Delhi police have not intervened in violent attacks against Muslims, and the government is failing in its duty to protect its citizens. These incidents are even more concerning in the context of efforts within India to target and potentially disenfranchise Muslims across the country, in clear violation of international human rights standards.”

While he didn’t name lawmakers, Kumar said that the tweets are “factually inaccurate and misleading, and appear to be aimed at politicising the issue”.

“Our law enforcement agencies are working on the ground to prevent violence and ensure restoration of confidence and normalcy. Senior representatives of the Government have been involved in that process. Prime Minister has publicly appealed for peace and brotherhood. We would urge that irresponsible comments are not made at this sensitive time,” stated Kumar.

Also read: Narendra Modi’s Reckless Politics Brings Mob Rule to New Delhi

Two days earlier, Sanders had again criticised Trump for harping on weapons sales with India, when the US president should be cooperating with New Delhi on climate change.

“Instead of selling USD 3 billion in weapons to enrich Raytheon, Boeing and Lockheed, the United States should be partnering with India to fight climate change,” he tweeted on February 25, after US President announced at ‘Namaste Trump’ rally in Ahmedabad that India was buying $3 billion worth of military helicopters.

Sanders has been a critic of Trump’s engagement with Modi, including during the Howdy Modi even in Houston last year.

Sanders is, however, not the only one who has been highlighting the Delhi riots.

House Foreign Affairs committee chair Elliot Engel said that he was “deeply troubled by the deaths from the communal violence in India over the past couple of days”.

“The right to protest is a key aspect in democracy, but they must remain peaceful and police must ensure the safety of all,” he said.

Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Elizabeth Warren also criticised the violence, saying, “It’s important to strengthen relationships with democratic partners like India. But we must be able to speak truthfully about our values, including religious freedom and freedom of expression, and violence against peaceful protesters is never acceptable.”

Earlier, US Democrat Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal said the “deadly surge of religious intolerance in India is horrifying”.

The Indian Parliament had passed the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) last year, resulting in a series of protests across the country.

Jayapal had last year introduced a Congressional resolution urging India to end the restrictions on communications in Jammu and Kashmir and preserve religious freedom for all residents.

Congressman Alan Lowenthal too termed the violence a “tragic failure of moral leadership”.

“We must speak out in the face of threats to human rights in India,” he said.

Also read: Trump Says Modi Cited Rise in Muslim Population as Testament to Religious Freedom in India

Congresswoman Rashida Talib tweeted, “This week, Trump visited India but the real story should be the communal violence targeting Muslims in Delhi right now. We cannot be silent as this tide of anti-Muslim violence continues across India.”

The violence in Delhi prominently featured in the mainstream media.

The Washington Post reported, “The riots represent a serious escalation of tensions after months of protests in response to a controversial citizenship law and growing frictions between supporters and opponents of the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.”

“As President Trump toured India’s capital, at least 11 people were killed in communal clashes that have upended a working-class neighborhood,” the New York Times said.

Akhil Gogoi to Hold 24-Hour Anti-CAA Dharna in Jail

He has been lodged in the Guwahati Central Prison. A Special NIA court on Tuesday extended his judicial remand.

Guwahati: Peasant leader Akhil Gogoi, arrested under stringent UAPA during anti-CAA protests in Assam, said on Tuesday he will stage a 24-hour dharna in the jail from March 1 in protest against the contentious law.

A Special NIA Court on Tuesday extended the judicial remand of Gogoi, adviser of peasant body Krishak Mukti Sangram Samiti (KMSS), till March 7.

The organisation’s general secretary Dhairjya Konwar and Bittu Sonowal, president of KMSS students’ wing Satra Mukti Sangram Samiti (SMSS), were also remanded to judicial custody for the same period.

Both were arrested for their alleged roles in violence during anti-CAA protests.

Also Read: The Anti-CAA Protesters Should Retreat, and Live to Fight Another Day

While being produced before the court on Tuesday, Gogoi told journalists that the movement against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) is weakening because people are not united.

“We must be united. We are facing problems because we are not united. From March 1, I will sit on a 24-hour dharna in the jail against CAA and for strengthening the movement,” Gogoi said.

He has been lodged in the Guwahati Central Prison.

Gogoi said if BJP has to be defeated in the 2021 Assembly elections in the state, “we must create an alternative force”.

Gogoi, also an RTI activist, has been in judicial custody since December 26. He had mobilised public protests against the CAA across several districts in Upper Assam before his arrest on December 12.

His colleagues were taken into custody the next day.

Assam Police had registered an FIR against Gogoi under sections of the IPC and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act on December 13 and the case was handed over to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) the next day.

Konwar and Sonowal’s cases were also handed over to the agency.

Various organisations, including the Congress, the All Assam Students’ Union (AASU) and the Asom Jatiyatabadi Yuva Chhatra Parishad (AJYCP) have been demanding the immediate release of Gogoi.

Complaint Against Rana Ayyub for Tweet on Delhi Riots

The complainant has claimed that a video showing a mosque burning in Ashok Nagar is ‘old’, but The Wire’s report has confirmed that it is authentic.

New Delhi: A Mumbai resident has filed a police complaint application seeking action against journalist Rana Ayyub for posting an “old” video purportedly of the Delhi violence, an official said on Wednesday.

The complainant Ramesh Solanki claimed the video was two-year old, and it was posted by Ayyub “with an intention to spread hatred in the society and to add more fuel to the Delhi violence”.

In his complaint, which he filed online on Tuesday, Solanki (50) also uploaded a photo of Rana’s tweet and the twitter handle “@ranaayyub”.

“Please take action against this hate-monger Rana Ayyub. The video shared by Rana Ayyub is two-year old and she is sharing it again in this situation trying to spread hatred in the society and to incite people and add more fuel to the Delhi violence.

“Rana is regular at posting false rumours and defame India and Government of India, it’s very necessary to take action against her before she is successful in creating communal disharmony in the country, arrest her and take legal action against her (sic),” stated the complaint.

A senior Mumbai Cyber Crime official said they will first verify facts before deciding to take any action, if needed.

“If needed, we will transfer the complaint to police station concerned for further investigation,” he said.

Also Read: Delhi Riots: Death Toll Climbs to 20, Arvind Kejriwal Asks Centre to Deploy Army

A 45-second video clip posted on the twitter handle @RanaAyyub on February 25 shows some men attempting to place a saffron flag and the National tricolour on what looks like a minaret, against the backdrop of billowing black smoke.

“Re-posting this video after verifying its authenticity. It is from Delhi. Men marching on top of a mosque, vandalising it and placing a saffron flag over it,” Ayyub tweeted.

Ayyub had shared the video earlier as well, but deleted it after it was alleged to be fake. She then posted it again.

The Wire‘s reporters were at Ashok Nagar to see the mosque being burnt, while AltNews has also shown that the video is authentic and not fake or old.

Twenty people have died so far and over a hundred were injured in the violence that has gripped several parts of north east Delhi since Sunday. The violence was provoked by BJP leader Kapil Mishra, who on Sunday threatened anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) protesters if they did not vacate their sit-in demonstrations within three days.

(With PTI inputs)

Debate: The Anti-CAA Protesters Should Retreat, and Live to Fight Another Day

The agitation is now really benefiting those who benefit from communalism in politics.

My sincere advice to the protesters against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) at Shaheen Bagh and elsewhere in India is to call off the current agitation now.

I oppose the CAA myself. Nevertheless, the time has come to end the anti-CAA agitation. Consider the facts:

  1. The BJP government will never withdraw this law. Their leaders have repeatedly declared this.
  2. The agitation is now leading to violence. Violent clashes have occurred between pro-government groups and the anti-CAA protesters in several places in northeast and south Delhi — Jafrabad, Maujpur, Chandbagh, etc.
  3. Such violent incidents will increase in the future, and this will further create Hindu-Muslim animosity. While Muslims generally support the agitation, Hindus increasingly feel that this agitation has become a nuisance, which is causing problems and disruption in their day to day lives.
  4. Who benefits from the increase in communalism? Those who thrive on it politically. So this agitation is now really benefiting them, and the anti-CAA agitators are unwittingly helping them.

In war, one cannot always keep moving forward. Sometimes one has to retreat. For instance, Lord Krishna withdrew from Mathura when faced with the superior forces of Jarasandh, and went to Dwarka. For this, he was known as ‘Ranchhod’ (i.e. one who abandoned the battle), but ‘Ranchhod’ is an honourable, not a dishonourable, title.

Also read: At Shaheen Bagh, Muslim Women Take Their Place as Heroes of the Movement

When Napoleon invaded Russia in 1812, Kutuzov, the Russian army commander withdrew instead of having a direct confrontation with the superior French forces and even abandoning Moscow. Using this strategy he defeated Napoleon.

During the American War of Independence ( 1775-1781 ), General George Washington often retreated, when faced with superior British forces, and so did the Chinese during their Long March, and the Vietcong in Vietnam.

Many more such historical examples can be recalled to show that ‘he who fights and runs away, lives to fight another day’.

It is time now for good sense to prevail among the anti-CAA agitators. They have made their point, and now their leaders, in the words of the Urdu poet Aatish, should tell the followers ‘Bas ho chuki namaz, musalla uthaiye‘.

An elderly anti-CAA protester gestures, while she talks to Supreme Court-appointed interlocutors, during an interaction, at Shaheen Bagh in New Delhi, Thursday, Feb. 20, 2020. Photo: PTI

While I have broached this suggestion keeping in mind the objective reality, it is natural that many will have questions and misgivings. I have attempted to address some of these doubts and queries:

Won’t the calling off of the protest be understood by the Modi government and the BJP as a sign of weakness and they may then escalate their offensive against all forms of protest?

The agitators should announce that they are calling off the agitation, not because they have any doubts about the truth of their cause or their strength and conviction in pursuing it, but because they wish to avoid violence, which is inevitable if the agitation continues, and will only benefit communal forces in the country. They must remember the events of Bloody Sunday in St Petersburg in Russia in January 1905 and must avoid its repetition.

Shaheen Bagh has inspired protests around the country and compelled the foreign media to take note. That critical coverage, in turn, has served as a pressure point on the Modi government. If the protest ends, international media may lose interest in the anti-CAA movement.

In my view, the foreign media has had no impact on the Modi government, which is wholly indifferent to such pressures.

Also read: Watch | Shaheen Bagh Protesters Respond to SC’s Suggestion to Shift Protest Site

Ending the protest may have been viable if the Supreme Court had been proactive in at least listing and hearing petitions filed against the CAA. But the apex court seems to not be interested in dealing with the substantive issue.

How is this relevant? And the less said about the Supreme Court the better, considering its recent record.

One of the positive features of Shaheen Bagh has been the absence of established political parties. People, in a sense, have demonstrated their own leadership. By ending the Shaheen Bagh protests, there is a risk that these parties will re-emerge and attempt to hijack the movement.

Established political parties, other than the BJP, have become impotent and irrelevant. So the possibility of their hijacking the movement is remote

Justice Markandey Katju is a former judge of the Indian Supreme Court.

SC Appointed Interlocutors Continue Talks With Shaheen Bagh Protestors

“Don’t think if you change your spot, your fight will die down,” the interlocutors said.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court-appointed interlocutors met Shaheen Bagh protestors on Thursday during their second visit to the site where people have been on a sit-in for the last two months against the Citizenship Amendment Act.

Advocates Sanjay Hedge and Sadhana Ramachandran, the interlocutors, were not willing to start the discussion in the presence of media. The protestors tried to convince them that they want to represent their issues before the media, but the journalists were later asked to leave.

Ramachandran began addressing the protestors saying, “Aapne bulaya, hum chale aaye (You called us and we are here)”.

On Monday, the Supreme Court observed that the blockade of the road at Shaheen Bagh was “troubling” and suggested the protesters go to another site where no public place would be blocked. It, however, upheld their right to protest.

Also read: ‘We Must Together Find a Solution’: SC Interlocutors Visit Shaheen Bagh

The apex court also asked Hegde to “play a constructive role as an interlocutor” to persuade the protesters to move to an alternative site. It said the interlocutors could seek former bureaucrat Wajahat Habibullah’s assistance.

Hegde said the apex court has recognised their right to protest.

“When Shaheen Bagh has become become an example of protests in India, let us set an example of a protest that does not disturb anybody. You all must be rest assured that we are here to fight for you. Don’t think if you change your spot, your fight will die down,” Hegde told the protestors.

Watch | Shaheen Bagh Protesters Respond to SC’s Suggestion to Shift Protest Site

The senior lawyer said, “We have seen many prime ministers come and go. Whoever comes in power and runs the country, sometimes some could be right and some could be wrong. Whatever you are saying the whole country is listening and also the PM.”

The protestors have been demanding repeal of the Citizenship Amendment Act.

Ramchandran said she was “really waiting” for that day when the “country’s atmosphere will change”.