His Blood Was Red Too

A poem written in the wake of the attacks on the students of Jawaharlal Nehru University.

He gripped the stick in an iron fist
Brandishing it
On terrified kids.

One young boy caught his eye
by his clothes
easily identified.

They’re not one of us, they’re different
most likely to be miscreants
scare them into oblivion.

On those orders, in furious strides
he struck the young man on the spine
and watched him fall with a shrieking cry.

The boy’s face hit the concrete floor
bruised forehead and bloodied nose,
writhing in pain from the raining blows.

Suddenly to the boys’ surprise,
the beating stopped and the older man’s eyes
teared up because he finally knew

The young boy’s blood was red too.

Sanjana Saksena Chandra is a marketer by profession, a published poet and an aspiring novelist.

Featured image credit: Pariplab Chakraborty

As Protests Engulf India, Kashmiri Students Feel They Have a Target on Their Backs

‘My parents are worried and have strictly advised me to steer clear of any kind of protests. They think that Kashmiris are easy targets and I agree.’

Having never witnessed protests of such magnitude outside Kashmir, Sana (name changed), a student of Jamia Millia Islamia, says that there is an uncanny resemblance between protests back home and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) demonstrations across India – despite the varying contexts involved. 

Even though Sana has extended her full support to students protesting at Jamia, which is still recovering from the brutal police violence the campus witnessed in December, she says she has to be extra careful due to her identity.

“There is a palpable sense of fear… I do not feel safe anymore. My parents are worried and have strictly advised me to steer clear of any kind of protests. They think that Kashmiris are easy targets and I agree. We cannot risk being identified as protestors as that could mean getting into trouble,” she explains.

Sana was inside the library when the police forcefully entered the campus and lathi-charged protesting students on the evening of December 15. The students of Jamia had been peacefully protesting against the CAA since December 13.

After being denied entry to her hostel that night, Sana stayed at a friend’s place. Fearing for her safety, she flew home the next day. 


Also read: Why I Fight


Just 20 days after the violence at Jamia, hostels inside Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) were attacked by masked goons armed with sticks, clubs and other weapons. Dozens of students and several teachers were injured.

As the Delhi police grappled with investigation only to turn the glare on the students who were attacked, and India Today sting operation identified some of the masked attackers and their Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) affiliations.

Among them was Akshat Awasthi, the alleged mastermind of the attack, who confessed to attacking a student with a beard because he thought he looked like a Kashmiri. “There was a man with a flowing beard. He looked like a Kashmiri. I beat him up and then broke the gate with my kicks,” Awasthi said.

“What happened in JNU has left us all shaken. It was evident that the attack was well planned and the attackers knew whom to target. This clearly shows that we are not safe anywhere in the country,” says Nabeel (name changed), a JNU student.

The tendency Kashmiris have of constantly looking over their shoulders is not without reason. In the aftermath of the attack in Pulwama, several Kashmiri students were threatened, thrashed and even forced to shout ‘Vande Mataram’ and ‘Hindustan Zindabad’. Many Kashmiris, afraid for their lives, were forced to return home. 

“As a Kashmiri, I can say that the Kashmiri community outside is very vulnerable. This has been proven over and over again these past few years – during the fallout of the Pulwama attack and also the cricket controversy where a Kashmiri student at Sharda University was beaten,” says Suhail (name changed), a PhD scholar from JMI.

The large-scale protests in India, the police action, arbitrary arrests and detentions, and the slogans of ‘Azaadi’ reverberating from loudspeakers may remind Kashmiris of their homeland, but for some, the resemblance starts and ends there.


Also read: Who’s Afraid of the University?


According to Suhail, to understand the history of the conflict of Kashmir, one first has to understand the nature of protests and how they evolved over the decades in the face of cycles of violence. “You have to understand its long, tragic trajectory – from the political betrayal, to the confiscation of rights and the geopolitical context. In Delhi, people are protesting against a particular Act that they consider unconstitutional,” he says.

According to a 2015 survey conducted by Medecins Sans Frontieres, 45% of the Valley’s population showed symptoms of mental distress and 93% had experienced conflict-related trauma. Apprehension about an uncertain future for Muslims in India, added to years of trauma from back home, and the ongoing lockdown of the former state has created an environment of fear and insecurity among Kashmiri students. 

Khalid (name changed), who is studying at JMI, has undergone bouts of anxiety attacks since the start of the protests at his university. “The situation here today is a constant reminder of the conflict back home. I suffer from anxiety and was hospitalised because of the panic attacks,” he says.

Though Kashmiris have extended their full support to these protests, there are many who feel betrayed that the pan-India response being seen against the CAA was nowhere in sight when the rights of Kashmiris were violated and the lockdown, which is now five months in, began.

Farhan (name changed), a Kashmiri freelance journalist based in Delhi, says that Kashmiris are standing with the protestors even though not many had much to say over the Narendra Modi government’s actions in Jammu and Kashmir.

“I am in support and solidarity of all those who are speaking against the unjust CAA. It’s good that they are raising their voices and taking a stand. The secular nature of the constitution is being threatened and they have a right to protest against it. Ultimately, it is the voices of the governed that matter,” he says.

Asma Hafiz and Ifreen Raveen are MA Convergent Journalism students at Jamia Millia Islamia. 

Featured image credit: Reuters/Edited by LiveWire

JNU Vice-Chancellor ‘Mastermind’ of January 5 Attack, Says Congress Fact-Finding Report

The team identified the attack as “targeted” violence intended to intimidate and instil fear into the students and faculty.

New Delhi: A fact-finding team’s report on the violence at the Jawaharlal Nehru University on January 5 identified the attack as “targeted” violence intended to intimidate and one that was done with the support and encouragement of the institution’s vice-chancellor.

Soon after the January 5 mob attack, Congress decided to form the fact finding committee under All India Mahila Congress president Sushmita Dev. The committee comprised Ernakulam MP Hibi Eden, party leader Amrita Dhawan and Rajya Sabha MP Dr. Sayid Naseer Hussain, in addition to Dev.

The evidence collated by the inquiry committee revealed that the armed attackers were systematically mobilised inside and the campus by the security company (Cyclops P. Ltd) on duty. It also found active involvement of a few faculty members in facilitating the violence. 


The report suggested the involvement of the rightwing in the attack. It said:

“There is every reason to believe that the mob that attacked the students and teachers on campus were from the right-wing factions. The WhatsApp groups like ‘Friends of RSS’ and ‘Unity against Left’ that were used to mobilise and provoke people to attack the students and faculty on campus speak volumes about the ideology of the people involved in the attack.”

It claimed that the attackers did not touch the students and faculty who were in support of the rightwing and aimed attacks on students of a particular religion. 

The report alleged that the vice chancellor of the university, M. Jagadesh Kumar, was the “master mind” behind the incident.

“Since his appointment in 2016, he meticulously infiltrated the University with people in the faculty who did not merit their positions and promoted only those who would be compliant to him and had their inclination to right wing ideology. He deliberately imposed his decision on the university students and teachers without due process and then refused to engage with the duly elected students and teachers of the union which led to the deadlock,” reads the report. 

Dev said that she attempted to speak to the VC several times but he didn’t agree to a talk.


The fact-finding team also found discrepancies in the version of the vice chancellor and the police regarding the time when the police was allowed to enter the campus. 

“The press release of the vice chancellor on 5th January 2020 states the administration called the police at about 4.30 pm but the police has given a statement that they were allowed to enter the Campus at about 7.45 pm by the administration,” mentions the report. 

The report raised some eyebrows on the disconnection of server and electricity on the campus on January 5. “There is no explanation why the server was down on January 5. It is almost as if the VC took advantage of the disconnection of the server to prevent a recording of CCTV footage to protect the attackers and go about their business without any record,” reads the report. 

Also read: JNU Attack: What the Delhi Police Has Done and What it Hasn’t

As per the report, the police stationed on the campus silently watched the attackers move around. Emergency calls to the police by the students went unanswered.

“The complicity of the Delhi police on January 5 clearly brings the Home Ministry into suspicion. The remarks by the Home Minister on the Citizenship Amendment Act-National Register of Citizens (CAA-NRC) agitations and punishing of ‘tukde tukde gang’ had also emboldened the perpetrators of violence in the JNU campus on January 5,” it added. 

Recommendations of the Committee 

The committee has recommended immediate dismissal of the VC and the setting up of an independent inquiry team to look at all appointments made from January 27, 2016 (date of Kumar’s appointment) till date and all other financial and administrative decisions taken during his tenure. 

It demanded criminal investigation against Kumar, the company that provides security service on the campus, and the members of the faculty who conspired with the attackers to unleash the violence. It also sought to fix accountability of the Commissioner of Delhi Police and other police officials who didn’t promptly act on the emergency calls by the students and faculty members from the JNU campus on January 5.

Immediate rollback of the fee hike and recognition of Jawaharlal Nehru University Students’ Union (JNUSU) as an elected body was also demanded by the committee. 

‘He Looked Like a Kashmiri… I Beat Him Up’: India Today ‘Unmasks’ JNU Attackers

Even as the Delhi Police turned its focus on students of the Left despite various recorded evidence of ABVP being behind the JNU violence, a TV channel aired a confession that led to the BJP youth wing disowning two of its activists.

New Delhi: While the Delhi Police has claimed yesterday that Left organisations and students were behind the violence at Jawaharlal Nehru University on January 5, one hour later, a television channel aired a ‘sting operation’ in which a volunteer with the BJP’s student wing, Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) admits to having organised the attack on Sabarmati hostel.

The Delhi Police’s “hurried” press conference on Friday only referred to the January 4 disruption of the server room of the university. There was, however, no reference to the violence a day later, in which the university campus was terrorised by masked men and women armed with lathis and other weapons, which has led to outrage and protests across educational institutes in India.

The ‘sting operation’, aired by India Today channel on Friday, showed two students of BA (French) at JNU, one of whom claimed to be from the ABVP, testifying to their involvement to the violence on January 5. ABVP has disowned both the students as being part of their organisation.

India Today also produced a photograph published on the front page of a national newspaper to prove that Akshat Awasthi was identified to be at the helm of an ABVP rally.

As per the India Today investigation, Awasthi showed the video to the journalists which depicted him with his face covered and rushing through hostel corridors.

Also read: Rough Edges: Police Double Standards, JNU and a Most Dubious Press Conference

“What did you have in your hand?” an India Today undercover reporter asked Awasthi.

“It was a stick, sir. I pulled it out from a flag lying near [the] Periyar [hostel].”

“Did you hit someone?” the reporter asked.

“There was a man with a flowing beard. He looked like a Kashmiri. I beat him up and then broke the gate with my kicks.”

Awasthi claimed that the attack was in reaction to an assault by Left students on Periyar hostel the same day. “It was a reaction to their action,” he said.

The first-year student recounted that mobs smashed vehicles and furniture on the street facing Sabarmati hostel. “All students and teachers standing there ran away when the attack happened. They had no idea that the ABVP would ever retaliate like this,” he said.

As per the video, Awasthi claimed that he was behind the entire planning. “I can tell you that I did all the mobilisation. They don’t have that much mind. You know you need to act like a superintendent or a commander. Why it’s to be done and where exactly. I guided them about everything – where to hide, where to go. I told them to do everything systematically. I didn’t have any position or a tag. Still they listened to me carefully,” the student claimed.

He added that the not only did he mobilise the mob, but he also channelled their anger in the right direction.

India Today also found another student, Rohit Shah, who stated that he had given his helmet to Awasthi. “It [a helmet] is a must for safety when you smash glass,” Shah said. He also claimed to have identified rooms of ABVP affiliated students. “I told them [the masked persons] it’s an ABVP room and they walked away”.

Also read: JNU Violence: Delhi Police Name JNUSU President, 8 Others as Suspects

Shah added that he was proud of what had happened in JNU on Sunday evening. “If it [the attack] hadn’t been carried out the way it was, they [the Left] would not have realised the ABVP’s strength”.

Akshat Awasthi had also claimed that a police officer encouraged them to retaliate. “They [police] were inside the campus not outside. I had called the police myself after a student was injured at Periyar [hostel during an earlier attack]. He met Manish [a student] and said, ‘hit them, hit them’.”

When asked about street lights being switched off at the time of the attack, Awasthi admitted that it was done to hid the mobilisation by ABVP.

Reporter: Who shut down the street lights? You guys?

Akshat Awasthi: Admin… I think police.

Reporter: Why did the police do that?

Akshat Awasthi: They did not want [anyone] to see that the mobilisation was happening.

Reporter: So, the police helped you, the ABVP?

Akshat Awasthi: Whose police is it, sir?

The Jawaharlal Nehru University has so far only fired a First Information Report (FIR) over university servers being damaged on January 4. The administration has claimed that the violence of January 5 has roots in the destruction of the server room on Saturday.

Meanwhile, India Today also aired another video showing former JNUSU president and AISA member Geeta Kumar admitting to being involved in disrupting the server room.

“None of our demands have been met, he [the JNU VC] didn’t even meet us, so we decided to close the server room,” she said.

Also read: JNU Attack: What the Delhi Police Has Done and What it Hasn’t

“Our VC does everything online, sends love letter [slang] online, sends Happy Near Year online, sends warnings online, so we thought that he has exceeded everything, there are no exams, none of our demands is met, he didn’t even meet us, so we decided to close the server room so that the administration does not function,” she said.

After the ‘JNU Tapes’ went on-air, Geeta Kumari defended her actions and said that she has nothing to hide.

“JNU VC increases our fee a thousand time. He sends punishment letters for demanding the right to education. I myself have received countless such letters. We are fighting for our rights. We are in civil disobedience. That’s what I have said. Nothing to hide,” she said.

Kumari later tweeted justifying her actions.

When the Indian Express contacted Kumari, she said, “How can the reaction to this incident be ABVP’s violence on us? We accept admin work had stopped because of our protest. Then they should have come and talked to us; who is the ABVP to come and hit us?”

ABVP vice president Nidhi Tripathi has denied that either Awasthi or Shah were associated with the student organisation. “They are not holding any position within the ABVP. Anyone participating in ABVP or JNUSU events cannot qualify to become their members automatically. Police are investigating the entire case. Anyone involved in violence at the JNU should be prosecuted. We will fully support the police in their investigation,” she said.

Even BJP spokesperson Amit Malviya has insisted that ABVP has no office-bearer in the first year of any degree program in JNU, as per India Today.

However, the TV channel has never claimed that Akshat Awasthi is an office-bearer, neither did the student in the video. However, Awasthi had claimed in the India Today video to having organised ABVP members towards the end of rampaging through Sabarmati hostel.

The Delhi Police also took notice of India Today’s investigation and said the ongoing probe would cover all angles of the case. “We will include all aspects in our investigation, including the investigation done by India Today,” Delhi Police spokesman M.S. Randhawa said.

The Indian Express reported that the Delhi Police’s press conference that linked nine students showed that the police investigators have “relied heavily on videos and photos circulated by ABVP over the last five days”.

Also read: Investigating the Masked Woman in a Viral Video During JNU Violence

DCP (Crime) Joy Tirkey listed four Left outfits — SFI, AISF, AISA and DSF — and said seven of the nine students belonged to them, but did not mention ABVP, even though the remaining two students belonged to that group.

The newspaper also pointed out that the photo and text released by police had a couple of errors. The photo of ABVP’s Shiv Poojan Mandal was used in place of Vikas Patel – and it was changed only after the error was pointed out.

“Police also stated that Patel was pursuing a course called ‘MS’ Korean, though there is no course in JNU with the abbreviation ‘MS’,” said the Indian Express report.

During the press conference, Delhi Police also called SFI (Students Federation of India) as Student Front of India, multiple times. They also mis-identified Sucheta Talukdar as a member of SFI, even though she is a JNUSU councillor from AISA.