Aligarh: A BJP MP has asked Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) to explain why it displays a portrait of Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
In a letter written to vice-chancellor Tariq Mansoor, Aligarh MP Satish Gautam objected to hanging the picture of the founder of Pakistan on the walls of the AMU student union office. AMU spokesperson Shafey Kidwai defended the portrait, that has apparently been hanging there for decades, saying that Jinnah was a founder member of the University Court and granted life membership of the student union.
Traditionally, photographs of all life members are placed on the walls of the student union, he told PTI.
“Jinnah was also accorded life membership of the AMUSU in 1938. He was the founder member of the University Court in 1920 and also a donor,” Kidwai said, adding that he was granted membership before the demand of Pakistan had been raised by the Muslim League,” he said.
He also said that no national leader had raised any objection to the photo even after Independence. These included Mahatma Gandhi, Maulana Azad, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, C Rajagopalachari, Rajendra Prasad and Jawaharlal Nehru.
Kidwai sad that the AMU student union has had a long tradition of granting life membership to prominent people in political, social and educational fields. “Their photographs were a part of the rich heritage of undivided India and no one ever thought of raising this issue before.”
The first recorded life membership by the student union was the one granted to Mahatma Gandhi on October 29, 1920, he added. “This was followed by a long list of luminaries including Rajagopalachari, Nehru, Sarojini Naidu, C. V. Raman and British writer E. M. Forster.”
Last week, the AMU vice chancellor received a letter from an “RSS activist” Amir Rasheed seeking permission to organise a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh shakha (camp) on the campus. Kidwai said, “The University is not considering any proposal for allowing any camp or shakha organised by any political party.”
“We have a tradition of not allowing political parties to put up their candidates either for contesting the Students’ Union polls or the Teachers’ Association elections,” he said. “AMU was not under any sort of pressure from any government agency,” he added.
He said the student union enjoyed a certain autonomy within the legal framework of the University’s constitution as enshrined by an Act of Parliament.
“No vice chancellor or governing body has ever tried to infringe upon such rights and hence, while we may have different views from the student union on many matters, the AMU authorities have always tried to avoid directly intervening in their matters,” he added.