New Delhi: The Delhi high court has directed Twitter to take down allegedly defamatory tweets posted by historian Audrey Truschke against Vikram Sampath over allegations of plagiarism.
Justice Amit Bansal, who was dealing with an application by Sampath for removal of the tweets, said that the tweets are defamatory in nature and contain links to the very same letters whose publication was restrained by the court earlier and a prima facie case is made out on behalf of the plaintiff.
Sampath’s application forms part of his defamation lawsuit against Truschke and others over the allegations of plagiarism against him concerning his work on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar.
The court noted that in spite of interim orders passed against her, Truschke continues to post defamatory material against the plaintiff on Twitter and has failed to enter an appearance before it.
“A prima facie case is made out on behalf of the plaintiff… In view of the fact that the defendant no.1 (Truschke) has not submitted to the jurisdiction of this Court and is not appearing in these proceedings, the defendant no.4/Twitter is directed to take down the following tweets as mentioned in prayer ‘a’ of the present application,” the court said in its order dated May 2.
“In my view, the tweets with regard to the subject matter of the present application are defamatory in nature and there is a link posted in the said tweets to the very same letters, the publication of which was injuncted by this Court vide orders dated 18th February 2022 and 24th February 2022,” it added.
The court also granted four weeks to Truschke to file her reply to the plea.
On February 18, the court, in its interim order passed against academics Truschke, Ananya Chakrabarti, Rohit Chopra and others, had restrained the publication of any defamatory material and the letter written to the Royal Historical Society in London alleging plagiarism by Sampath concerning his work on Savarkar.
The court had issued a summons on the suit and said that the plaintiff historian made out a prima facie case for the grant on ad-interim protection as the content of the letter was damaging his career and reputation.
On February 24 as well, the court had directed Twitter to take down several tweets made by Truschke.
In the plea, the plaintiff has said that he is the author of a critically acclaimed biography of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and is a fellow of the Royal Historical Society in London but certain defendants wrote to the Society making serious allegations of plagiarism concerning the two-volume biography.
He has claimed that the allegations of plagiarism were baseless considering that the piece contained due citations, attributions, and footnotes and that he is at the receiving end of an international smear campaign to discredit him because he has shown the academic courage and gumption to challenge the prevailing narrative around a historical figure like Sh. V.D. Savarkar .
In the plea filed through lawyer Mukesh Sharma, apart from seeking an injunction against the named individuals, the plaintiff has also sought around Rs two crore as damages.
The three scholars have pointed out multiple sentences from one of Sampath’s articles on Savarkar, published in 2017, which they say have either been directly reproduced verbatim or paraphrased without proper attribution from two articles. The Wire‘s report offers comparative analyses of alleged similarities.
In an email to The Wire, Sampath had denied the allegations, stressing that he had duly credited all influences in his work. He had called the letter “libelous”. He had also indicated that he would soon take “due legal recourse”, including against The Wire, for reporting its contents.
The matter will be heard next on July 28.
(With PTI inputs)