The Location of Netaji’s Statue Should Have Been Better Chosen

Narendra Modi speaks of transparency but there was no deliberation with experts or any public consultation before this obviously ad hoc decision to place Subhas Chandra Bose under the canopy at India Gate was taken.

In the early morning of August 13, 1965, some dozen members of the newly formed ‘Samyukta Socialist Party’, a breakaway group from the ‘Praja Socialist Party’ of India, crept through the deserted avenues of New Delhi carrying hammers, chisels, ladders and buckets of tar, towards the towering white marble statue of King George V under a cupola, 150 metres away on the eastern side of the India Gate.

The Gate was built by the British as a memorial to 90,000 soldiers of the British Indian Army who died abroad in the Great War (WW1) and in the Afghan ‘War of Independence’. The India Gate complex was part of the work of the Imperial War Graves Commission which came into existence in December 1917.

The Socialists scaled the statue of the king, hacked off a part of the nose, ear and crown, and poured tar over the sculpture. They ended their campaign by hanging a portrait of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. In the process, there was a brief scuffle with two policemen on duty. It took three years for the King’s statue to be removed.

This was not the first time that the statue of the King Emperor was vandalised. On the night of January 3, 1943, amidst the Quit India movement, some Indian National Congress leaders scaled the statue, smashed its nose and draped it with a large black cloth inscribed ‘Death to the tyrant’.

Fifty-seven years on, the mission of the Socialists appears to be succeeding. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has announced that a granite statue of Netaji would be placed under the imposing sandstone cupola designed by Sir Edwin Lutyens.

This is the second time a Netaji statue is being placed in the Capital on a pedestal built for a British ruler.

Earlier, in 1975, a statue of Subhas Chandra Bose was installed at Edward Park (now called Netaji Park) near the Jama Masjid and Red Fort, on an abandoned pedestal where once stood an imposing equestrian statue of King Edward VII. This means Netaji now replaces two British monarchs from their places in the national capital. One wonders why Netaji could not be given a pedestal specifically designed for his statue on a piece of land in New Delhi as a symbol of India’s “indebtedness” to him. Why such misery of space just for him?

Also read: If Statues Could Speak: What Netaji and Sardar Patel Would Tell Narendra Modi

Following the action of the Samyukta Socialist Party, the government mooted, in February 1966, the idea of installing a Gandhi statue under the canopy near India Gate in place of the King George V statue. The distinguished sculptor, Ram Sutar, began work on the statue. His design was approved by the government in 1979. But that government collapsed. The project went to the back burner.

On November 23, 1981, the government informed parliament that “Various aspects such as the site, shape and size of the statue have been under consideration of the Government. A final decision on the matter is expected to be reached soon.” But in reality nothing moved. Sutar was still working on the statue. He was given no target date of completion. Controversy erupted every time a location was suggested for installing the Gandhi statue.

Eleven years later, a meeting of the Union cabinet held in July 1992 passed a proposal to install the statue at India Gate, “leaving the exact location to be decided by the Minister of Urban Development in consultation with others”. In 1994, the Cabinet decided to develop the area around India Gate as ‘August Kranti Udyan’ and install the Mahatma Gandhi statue somewhere in it. They also said that there were many alternative proposals for the exact spot of the statue. Finally, in 1995, a Group of Ministers, on directions of the Union cabinet, reconsidered the matter and recommended that the statue be installed under the canopy.

There were protests from historians, town planners and architects that the India Gate precinct is a part of the original layout of Rajpath and should not be tampered with. They felt the canopy should remain empty as a “symbol of the end of the Raj” and that it was not appropriate to install any single leader’s statue. Conversely, a proposal to demolish the canopy did not find favour with the planners either.

In response to a writ petition, the Delhi high court passed an interim order in July 1995 “restraining the government from altering/removing/ demolishing the canopy at India Gate complex”.

An RTI filed before the Central Public Works Department in 2008 led to the CPWD denying that the Mahatma’s statue was to be installed in the empty canopy.

The Ministry of Urban Development, in reply to a question in parliament in 2009, clarified that there was a decade-old plan in the ministry to install a statue of Mahatma Gandhi at India Gate. The plan, however, had been put in cold storage following a writ petition on the matter (though the high court had disposed of the matter in March 2005). The minister added that the matter has not been taken up since 2005 – “there is no immediate demand or proposal to install a Gandhi statue at the India Gate”, he said. The status quo was maintained since then.

Also read: Modi’s Portrayal of Netaji as a Hindu Militarist Does the Secular, Socialist Bose a Disservice

Following a controversy over the rejection of a West Bengal tableau on Netaji for the 73rd Republic Day parade, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s sudden announcement on installing a Netaji statue at the earlier disputed and presently abandoned canopy near India Gate was seen by many as a politically diversionary tactic.

Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose saluting in Singapore (left); image of proposed Netaji statue tweeted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi (right)

Many find that the posture of the salute – as seen in images circulated by the government – is not correct and not befitting the supreme commander as seen in photos of Netaji taking a salute in Singapore, Tokyo or even earlier in Germany.

A traffic policeman in Bombay, 1945. Photo: Pinterest/Shrikant Patil

The statue’s location under the canopy also begs the question: from whom is he taking the salute? He is facing India Gate, a war memorial for Indian soldiers killed in World War I, but the Amar Jawan Jyoti has been moved away to a location that will be behind him, at the National War Memorial. Rashtrapati Bhavan, too, is more than 3 km away, so the Netaji statue cannot be connected to it either. To avoid these controversies, many feel any change at this heritage precinct should have been done only after due deliberations and proper public consultations, including with experts.

Speaking personally, Netaji in that posture, saluting, standing on a pedestal under a cupola, draws a strong resemblance with a traffic policeman standing on a covered kiosk at a road intersection. My strong dislike is the roof over Netaji’s head. His stature and height are immense. He should not look caged within four pillars and a roof above.

Netaji is a key personality in the Indian freedom struggle and the location of his statue should have been decided after considering various aspects and with due care. Some have argued that it does not behove giving him the space earlier occupied by a British ruler, that too which was a memorial built after the king’s death. In other words, that such a location is not suitable for a great hero. No wonder Delhites did not allow Gandhi’s statue to come up at that site either. But surprisingly this time, the people are silent. The opinion of the Delhi Urban Art Commission appears to be under control. Perhaps, Vijay Chowk could have been a better location.

Modi is heard talking about transparency in government functioning. Had that been put into practice here, these dissonant concerns could have been avoided.

Sumeru Roy Chaudhury is an architecture graduate from IIT, Kharagpur. He was the chief architect of the CPWD. He has studied the Netaji files and related documents in detail.

Manipur Polls: Angry With Candidates’ List, BJP Workers Ransack Offices, Some Quit Party

In many places, angry workers pulled down party flags and set them on fire.

Imphal: Upset over preference to turncoats in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s candidate lists, many karyakartas erupted in protest across Manipur on Sunday, January 30.

Angry workers in constituencies with many ticket seekers ransacked mandal offices, pulled down party flags and banners and set them ablaze. However, no untoward incidents were reported at major offices of the party in the state capital and district headquarters, which were put under an unprecedented security cover.

The BJP named its candidates for all the 60 assembly constituencies.

Chief Minister N. Biren Singh had the last laugh with S.S. Olis and son-in-law R.K. Imo securing party tickets. The party fielded the chief minister from his Heiyang assembly segment.

Three sitting MLAs — Y Erabot Singh of Wangkei A/C, P Saratchandra of Moirang A/C and M Rameshwar Singh of Kakching A/C were dropped.


The party fielded Congress turncoat Okram Henry Singh whose election was nullified by the high court of Manipur for withholding information in his election affidavit filed in 2017. Henry is the nephew of former Congress chief minister Okram Ibobi.

Also read: Manipur Congress MLA, Whose Drug Case Involvement BJP Had Made a Poll Issue, Joins Saffron Party

BJP also chose M Prithviraj and Y Surchandra over P Saratchandra and M Rameshwar Singh for Moirang and Kakching assembly seats respectively.

Protesting against the candidature of Congress turncoat RK Imo Singh who switched over to the BJP in November last year, BJP workers ransacked the Sagolband mandal office and declared abolition of madal.

As anticipated, with the announcement of BJP’s candidate, those who did not get a party ticket, resigned from the primary membership of the party and joined other parties. While Erabot decided to opt for the NPP and another BJP ticket seeker Ratankumar joined Janata Dal (United) in Wangkhei constituency. Meanwhile angry supporters of P Saratchandra pledged allegiance to the Congress.

Protests within Congress camp

The Congress, meanwhile, has announced its first list of 40 candidates. Upset over having been denied a Congress ticket, workers affiliated to former Hiyanglam MLA and Manipur Pradesh Congress Committee vice-president Dr Elangbam Dwijamani resigned from primary membership of the party. Dwijamani and his supporters also burned Congress flags and banners to register their strong protest against party leadership.


Sources said the Congress, which had bagged 28 seats in the 2017 election, is planning to enter into a pre-poll alliance with some Left parties. The candidates for the remaining 20 seats will be announced after finalising the seat sharing deal with the Left parties, they added.

The NPP had also announced its first list of 20 candidates for Manipur assembly elections. The party, which has four sitting MLAs and is currently in alliance with the BJP, is going alone in the upcoming election and has fielded candidates against its ally in all the seats.

Manipur will go to polls in two phases. First phase voting is scheduled for February 27 and voting for the second phase, on March 3. Notification will be issued on February 1 for the first phase and on February 4 for the second. The last date for filing nominations for the first phase is February 8 and for phase two, February 11. The scrutiny will be held on February 9 and February 14 for phase one and phase two, respectively. Counting of votes will take place on March 10.

This report was first published on The Frontier Manipur. Read the original here.

Gujarat ATS Arrests Muslim Cleric After Murder of Man Over Facebook Post

Kishan Boliya was shot dead by motorcycle-borne men on January 25 in retaliation for a post he had shared on Facebook on January 6.

Ahmedabad: A Muslim cleric was arrested from Delhi by the Gujarat Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) in connection with the murder of a man in Gujarat’s Dhandhuka town recently over an alleged objectionable Facebook post that the accused claimed hurt their religious sentiments, an official said.

Kishan Boliya was shot dead by motorcycle-borne men on January 25 in retaliation for a Facebook post he had shared on January 6, for which some Muslim community members had filed a police complaint claiming it hurt their religious sentiments.

ATS officials said Maulvi Kamargani Usmani was arrested from Delhi, and he is the second cleric to be held in the case after Mohammad Ayub Javrawala, who was nabbed from Ahmedabad on Friday.

ATS Superintendent of Police Imtiaz Shaikh told reporters Shabbir Chopda, who had shot dead Boliya, was in touch with Usmani through social media platform Instagram, adding that the arrested cleric ran a social organisation and instigated youth from the community to take action against those who insult Prophet Mohammad.

Chopda (25), Imtiaz Pathan (27) were held on Friday along with Javrawala, who instigated the two to commit the crime and also arranged for the murder weapon.

Usmani had directed Chopda to get in touch with Javrawala for action against Boliya, the ATS SP said, adding that the two clerics were in touch with each other.

The Gujarat ATS began its probe into the case on Saturday.

(PTI) 

‘If We Get Better Spyware From Israel, We Can Give Them $4 Bn’: Chidambaram’s Dig at Modi Govt

Chidambaram’s attack on the government came a day after a ‘New York Times’ report claimed that India bought Pegasus spyware as part of a $2 billion defence deal with Israel in 2017.

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram on Sunday cited Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s remarks that there cannot be a better time to set new goals in India-Israel relations to take a dig at him, saying it is the best time to ask Israel if they have any advanced version of the Pegasus spyware.

Chidambaram’s attack on the government came a day after a New York Times report claimed that India bought Pegasus spyware as part of a $2 billion defence deal with Israel in 2017. The report triggered a major controversy with the Opposition alleging that the government indulged in illegal snooping that amounted to “treason”.

“The prime minister said that it is the best time to set new goals in the India-Israel relationship. Of course, it is the best time to ask Israel if they have any advanced version of the Pegasus spyware,” Chidambaram said.

“The last deal was for $2 billion. India can do better this time. If we get more sophisticated spyware ahead of the 2024 elections, we can give them even $4 billion,” the former home minister said.

In a special video message on Saturday on the completion of 30 years of full-fledged diplomatic relations between India and Israel, Prime Minister Modi had said there cannot be a better time to set new goals for taking forward India-Israel relations and asserted that the importance of the relationship has increased amid significant changes in the world.

Chidambaram also attacked Union minister Gen (retired) V.K. Singh for calling The New York Times “Supari Media”.

Also read: ‘Treason’: Opposition Slams Centre Over Report That Pegasus Was Bought in 2017

“Minister V.K. Singh has called the New York Times ‘supari media’. Was he not the one who called Indian media ‘presstitutes’?” Chidambaram said in another tweet.

“I wonder if he has ever read newspapers like The New York Times or The Washington Post. I doubt if he knows the role played by the two newspapers in exposing the Watergate scandal and the Pentagon Papers. If he does not wish to read history, he can at least watch the movies!” the senior Congress leader said.

While Singh had called The New York Times “Supari Media”, a government source had said the matter related to the Pegasus software was being monitored by a committee under the Supreme Court – headed by retired Supreme Court judge R.V. Raveendran – and its report was awaited.

(PTI)

India’s Active COVID-19 Cases Decline to 18.5 Lakh, 959 Fatalities Reported in a Day

With 2,09,918 people testing positive for the coronavirus infection in a day, India’s total tally of cases increased to over 4.13 crore.

New Delhi: With 2,09,918 people testing positive for the coronavirus infection in a day, India’s total tally of cases increased to over 4.13 crore, according to Union health ministry data updated on Monday.

The death toll has climbed to 4,95,050 with 959 fatalities reported in a span of 24 hours, the data updated at 8 am showed.

The active cases decreased by 53,669 to reach 18,31,268 and comprise 4.43% of the total infections, while the country’s recovery rate stands at 94.37%, the ministry said.

The daily positivity rate was recorded at 15.77%, while the weekly positivity rate was 15.75%, it said.

The number of people who have recuperated from the disease increased to 3,89,76,122, while the case fatality rate was recorded at 1.20%, the ministry said

After the Sunday update, the total number of infections stands at 4,13,02,440, it said.

Meanwhile, the cumulative number of anti-Covid vaccine doses administered in the country so far has crossed 166.03 crore.

India surpassed the one-crore mark in the number of cases on December 19, 2020, and two crore on May 4 and three crore on June 23 last year.

(PTI)

An Illustrated Record of Kashmir’s Revered Mosques and Shrines

‘Architectural Ornamentation in Shrines & Mosques of Kashmir’ published by Roli Books explores little-known aspects of the region’s rich Islamic architecture.

Qamoos Bukhari, a photographer and researcher from Kashmir, has conceptualised and put together a visual arts book, Architectural Ornamentation in Shrines & Mosques of Kashmir, recently published by Roli Books in collaboration with the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage’s (INTACH’s) Kashmir chapter. The illustrated book explores the little-known aspects of Kashmir’s rich Islamic architecture through a combination of essays, historical images, new photography and architectural drawings of mosques and shrines spanning the 14th to 19th centuries.

From ‘Architectural Ornamentation in Shrines & Mosques of Kashmir’. Pen and ink illustration of wooden pendant at Khanqah-i-Naqshband, built in the 17th century. Drawing: Syed Basharat Ali

Bukhari, who earlier published a book on Kashmiri artisans, Borderless: The Artisans of Kashmir, in 2016, collaborated with INTACH for this art book project in 2017. He says the finished book is the first-of-its-kind illustrated survey of the main shrines and mosques of Kashmir, providing a comprehensive visual narrative and documentation of the unique architecture of prominent mosques and shrines of Kashmir.

The idea of combining photographs, both archival and new, with drawings and sketches of revered shrines and mosques germinated from a realisation of the limitation of each media. The idea was to use all the three mediums to better document and showcase the design vocabulary, and the past and present condition of these religious monuments.

The book gives a visual insight into the decorative architectural elements of these centuries-old main shrines and mosques in Kashmir. Bukhari believes the institutions in existence for the protection and upkeep of Kashmir’s historic monuments lack sensitivity and dedication.

From ‘Architectural Ornamentation in Shrines & Mosques of Kashmir’ (Roli Books, 2021). Window on the west of Khanqah-i-Maula, built in the 14th century. Photo: Qamoos Bukhari

“In Pampore, for example, there a 14th-century mosque, Mir Masjid, clearly a very important site as the carved woodwork on the eaves of the building is believed to be there from the time of its construction,” he says, adding that it’s a significant mosque structure and should be properly dated and preserved. But with every passing day, he adds, the site is falling into ruin.

Some of the elements that are showcased in the book are inaccessible to the general public and remain out of sight on their usual visits, according to Bukhari.

“So the book provides the opportunity to see and appreciate their intricate designs up close,” he says. Visitors from outside Kashmir, who might not have visited and seen all these monuments spread across different parts of Kashmir, will also get a better understanding and glimpses of Kashmiri craftsmanship at work.

“Some of them are lesser-known shrines and mosques, so the volume provides a peek into the brilliant Kashmiri craftsmanship,” says Bukhari, whose work has appeared in several international museum catalogues and journals.

The art book brings together 75 new colour photographs, 28 archival images, and 46 drawings and sketches that document the 18 religious monuments profiled in the book. The illustrated chapters are organised chronologically from the 14th to the 19th century.

Also read: Book Excerpt: Negotiating Monuments in a New Light

From ‘Architectural Ornamentation in Shrines & Mosques of Kashmir’ (Roli Books, 2021). CAD drawing of the wooden door and calligraphy in stone at Madin Sahab, built in the 15th century. Drawing: Taha Mughal

The photographs, sketches and drawings in the book are complimented by two essays. ‘Understanding Kashmir’s Islamic Religious Architecture in Continuity and Change’, contributed by Hakim Sameer Hamdani, author and former Design Director at INTACH Kashmir Chapter, gives an overview of the Islamic places of worship.

“The architectural outpourings of the area linked with its Islamic traditions have for the most part remained unexplored. The traditions of Kashmir’s Islamic religious architecture may be seen as the physical representation of a syncretic culture, which was based on assimilation and adaptation while also forging continuity with established building features and elements,” writes Hakim, the author of recently published book The Syncretic Traditions of Islamic Religious Architecture of Kashmir: Early 14th -18th Century.

“The strength of these local traditions was strong enough to outlive the powerful image of the Imperial Mughal rule which in the 16th century brought a building style that was developed outside the confines of the valley,” he continues. Hakim’s paper presents a “chronological study of this architectural genre in Kashmir as well as how it has been popularized in the community both through processes of continuity as well as change”.

Another interesting essay in the book titled Patterns of Culture: Understanding Craft through Mathematics is written by academic Fozia S. Qazi. Her essay provides a mathematical perspective to better understand, and appreciate, the complex craft-making structures and designs of these mosques and shrines. Qazi analyses the underlying mathematical principles involved in the creation of the symmetries present in the patterns. Her essay further explores the “cultural patterning in the erstwhile state of J&K State and its immediate neighborhood, through the use of mathematical tools of symmetry analysis as applied to patterns found in decorated forms in use in Kashmir from the earliest times to 19th century”.

From ‘Architectural Ornamentation in Shrines & Mosques of Kashmir’ (Roli Books, 2021). A portion from the painted ceiling at Imambara Hassanabad, built in the 19th century. Photo: Qamoos Bukhari

Archival images in the book have been sourced from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), The Alkazi Collection of Photography, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, and also from a few private collections. The book includes a unique photograph of Khanqah-i-Maula showing wall panels with painted floral motifs. Taken in 1890, the photo shows the entrance to the main prayer hall. The book also includes an early 20th-century photograph from the Archaeological Survey of India that shows the 17th-century glazed tiles (now disappeared) from a wall of the Madin Sahab tomb gateway.

“Similarly, a photograph from the shrine complex by Professor Ebba Kock shows some tiles that had remained on the archway leading to the tomb in 1986. The tiles are now disappeared and are dispersed across several museums worldwide. These tiles have also found buyers for millions of dollars in international auctions,” says Bukhari.

Cover of ‘Architectural Ornamentation in Shrines & Mosques of Kashmir’ (Roli Books, 2021).

M. Saleem Beg, convener of INTACH’s J&K chapter, which for the past nearly two decades has been instrumental in creating conservation plans, documenting and analysing the built heritage of Kashmir, writes in his foreword that the book, besides providing information and visual delight to the reader, also analyses the past and present condition of historic shrines and mosques through illustrated records.

“The purpose of this book is not only to appeal to subject experts but also to anyone looking for inspiration from these creations,” Beg writes in his foreword. “For the benefit of succeeding generations, this work is the best insurance that can be offered for preserving the sacred form represented through our built heritage.”

Majid Maqbool is a journalist and editor based in Srinagar, Kashmir.

After IIM Kozhikode Reveals Students’ Castes, Spotlight Back to Discrimination on Campus

The administration has since issued an “apology” for having “inadvertently shared the documents”. But students believe that cannot make up for the trauma they have faced.

Mumbai: In mid December last year, postgraduate programme students at the Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode (IIM-K) received an email from the programmes office regarding a mandatory workshop. The email, along with the details of the workshop, contained an additional “hidden sheet”. When students clicked on that, they found that all their personal information had been circulated to one and all – information about caste categories, percentile, disabilities, parents’ income, phone number and Aadhaar number.

Only after a student wrote to the programmes department about the blunder did the administration try to recall the email. But the damage was already done. The file was downloadable, and had been downloaded by many. Information that was not supposed to be public was out there for everyone to see. It was shared – and students ridiculed – in smaller informal groups. Jokes were soon being circulated and the discussion spilled into college- related social media pages in no time. Students who The Wire spoke to also said a few Instagram pages put out highly objectionable memes.

The administration has since issued an “apology” for having “inadvertently shared the documents”. An email response addressed to one student (who raised concerns over their details being shared in public) and marked to others read, “There were some hidden sheets in the attachment which was not known to the sender. The e-mails sent have been recalled immediately when it came to our notice. We have taken steps to correct our system so that such incidents of inadvertent sharing of documents would not happen in future. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused to you.”

Shubhasis Dey, the dean of programmes and international relations, told The Wire that he had immediately initiated “corrective measures” and made changes in the system to ensure such mistakes don’t happen again. “We conducted an internal inquiry and found out where exactly the mistake had occurred. We have taken enough precautions now to ensure students don’t face such difficulties,” Dey said.

Also read: Brahmins Claim to Be Victims of Affirmative Action. This ‘Untouchable’ Lawyer Begs to Differ.

The students, however, feel the email apology does not match the trauma they have had to go through. “You would find longer explanations when a stray dog or cat is ill-treated on campus. But the institute feels just by brushing the whole issue aside as a technical mistake, they can be absolved of their responsibilities,” said a postgraduate student.

The highly competitive management institutes have been known, in situations like this, to not be the most sensitive. The IIM campuses suffer from an acute social diversity deficit. A young female student, on the condition of anonymity, said, “These campuses are super elite. Students from marginalised communities spend all their time and energy just to ‘fit in’. And in such situations, if one’s caste locations and incomes are made public, you can imagine how alienating it would be for that child (student).”

The IIM campuses, which take pride in grooming “the best” for the market, also boasts of being highly “meritorious”. “And this concept of merit can be terribly debilitating for Bahujan students, who come from extremely trying backgrounds and avail reservations to reach till here,” said a senior faculty member. She added that even if the email were to be considered a mistake, it can’t be overlooked just like that.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty

IIM-K allegedly has a history of making Bahujan students feel unsafe on campus. A senior faculty member shared an incident from four years ago, when students belonging to the Dalit community were all housed in one hostel. “This was a blatant instance of segregation,” he said. But the authorities, then too, rendered an “apology” and called it a mistake.

When asked about this segregation, a criminal act under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Dey said it was a matter from the past and “corrective measures” have since been introduced.

Most students who The Wire approached, while sharing their own experience studying at the premier institute, also feared the consequences they would face later if their identities were revealed. “Our placements are in the hands of the institute,” one said.

The placement cell, some students claimed, has access to their CAT scores and caste categories, and without formally ever putting out the information, their personal details are always shared in their “friendly circles”. This, one student said, happens because among both the students and the faculty members, it is invariably the ‘upper’ castes who get the decision-making positions. “And they look at students availing reservations as the undeserving ones,” said a second- year postgraduate programme student.

Also read: Why the Andhra Pradesh Government Banned a 100-Year-Old Play

The student’s apprehension could stem from the fact that IIMs across the country have done very little to be inclusive. Faculty members have for long come from the upper caste category – or “general category”, as they commonly address themselves. Students say the insensitivity reflected in the responses of the institute is primarily an outcome of their caste locations. “Students from Bahujan communities usually end up alone on campus and they have no one to go to. Just a handful of teachers from similar caste identities try to help. But they are just so few and are dealing with their own anxieties and alienations,” a student from the senior management programme said.

In March 2017, Siddharth Joshi, a fellow at IIM Bangalore, and Deepak Malghan, a faculty member at IIM Bangalore, published an article in The Wire on the basis of a detailed data procured under the Right to Information Act. The data for 233 faculty members across six IIMs revealed that only two faculty members belonged to the Scheduled Castes (SC) and five from other backward classes (OBC). There are no faculty members belonging to scheduled tribes (ST).

They dug further, and with a new data set, they were able to find out that out of the 642 faculty members across all 13 IIMs, only four belonged to the SC category and only one belonged to the ST group. Only 17 faculty members belonged to the OBC category, the data revealed.

§

Prof Shubasis Dey, IIM Kozhikode, responds:

We would like to bring to your notice that The Wire article titled “After IIM Kozhikode Reveals Postgrad Students’ Castes, Spotlight Returns to Discrimination on Campus” is misleading in its title. As already shared in my previous statement with The Wire, the incident was an inadvertent error for which all necessary steps have been undertaken by the Institute to correct the system and preventing such incidents in the future, along with issuing an apology to students who felt aggrieved by this technical lapse. To bracket this under ‘caste discrimination’ practice is misrepresentative of the cherished objectives of IIM Kozhikode which has social equality, gender diversity and academic excellence at the core of its values and functioning. We have a zero tolerance policy towards discrimination of any kind – race, religion, sex, caste, gender, and ethnicity; and have always strived for affirmative action for social good in all these years of our existence, intrinsically linked with the holistic approach to learning that we passionately practice here. To quote a few of the various inclusive measures undertaken at IIMK:

1. We were the first IIM to admit more than 50% women in the flagship MBA programme way back in 2013 and repeated history in the year 2020.

2. We believe in meeting the reservation requirements as a constitutional obligation and the same have been fulfilled in our flagship programme admissions.

3. Special faculty recruitment drives are also regularly held by IIMK for filling vacant positions under reserved categories and we steadily encourage eligible community members to apply for the same through advertisement campaigns.

We are proud of our history as an inclusive institute which is composed of a diverse student group cutting across their social and geographical identities and nowhere in the twenty-five years of our existence, is discrimination in any form practiced or promoted. We will request The Wire to reconsider the title of the article in the above light.

Prof. Shubasis Dey,
Dean (Programmes & International Relations)
IIM 
Kozhikode

§

Sukanya Shantha responds:

Our story is based on several testimonies from students studying at IIM- K. While I appreciate prof. Dey’s detailed response, the narratives we gathered from students speak otherwise. We stand by every line written in the article.

Pegasus: 3 Parties Want Privilege Motion Against IT Minister for ‘Misleading’ Parliament

Congress, TMC and CPI MPs have all asked the speaker for a privilege motion against Ashwini Vaishnaw.

New Delhi: Leaders of three political parties – the Congress, Trinamool Congress and Communist Party of India – have moved privilege motions again Union minister for information technology Ashwini Vaishnaw for ‘misleading’ parliament on the Pegasus issue.

Leader of the Congress party in the Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury wrote to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Sunday after the New York Times, in its report, claimed that the Indian government bought the Israeli spyware in 2017 as part of a $2-billion package for weapons. A similar notice will be given in the Rajya Sabha as well, according to the Indian Express.

Chowdhury said the government, on the floor of the House, always maintained that it had nothing to do with Pegasus and that it never bought the spyware from the NSO Group.

“In light of the latest revelations by New York Times, it appears that the Modi government has misled Parliament and the Supreme Court and lied to the people of India.

“In view of the above, I demand that a privilege motion may be initiated against the Minister of Information Technology for deliberately misleading the House on the Pegasus issue,” the Congress leader said in his letter to the speaker.

He also alleged that the government “lied to the Supreme Court when it was directly questioned about the purchase and deployment of Pegasus”. The Congress leader pointed out that in a sworn affidavit, the government unequivocally denied “any and all” of the allegations against it on the Pegasus issue.

TMC MP Sougata Roy and CPI MP Binoy Viswam on Monday too submitted notices to move a privilege motion against Union minister Vaishnaw for his statement in Parliament last year on the Pegasus spyware issue.

The Pegasus issue rocked the monsoon session of Parliament last year when the Opposition demanded a discussion on the issue. On July 19, the opening day of the monsoon session, Vaishnaw had told both Houses that the story was “sensational” and an attempt “to malign Indian democracy and its well established institutions”.

As The Wire had revealed, Vaishnaw himself was on the leaked database of potential Pegasus targets.

Chowdhury alleged that the government was targeting political leaders, journalists, judges and civil society activists, using the Israeli spyware.

The Pegasus issue is likely to cast its shadow on the budget session of Parliament starting Monday, with the opposition parties set to raise the pitch in both houses.

In July last year, a global consortium of media houses including The Wire had published a series of reports under the Pegasus Project detailing how “vetted governments” across the world were using the military-grade spyware sold by the NSO Group to spy on rights activists, journalists, politicians, lawyers and others.

(With PTI inputs)

Australian Open: Rafael Nadal Crowns ‘Emotional’ Comeback With All-Time Record

Two months ago, Rafael Nadal was considering calling time on his professional tennis career due to a long-standing foot injury. His comeback victory in Melbourne was a fitting tribute to his remarkable recovery.


“Both players have arrived at their physical limits. The question is who can go beyond them?”

The question was posed by six-time Grand Slam winner Boris Becker on Eurosport heading into the fifth and final set of a pulsating Australian Open men’s final. The answer was Rafael Nadal.

After returning from a career-threatening foot injury, Nadal pushed well beyond his limits to return to Grand Slam winning form in Melbourne. His comeback from two sets down to beat Daniil Medvedev 2-6, 6-7, 6-4, 6-4, 7-5, was a testament to the former world number one’s remarkable recovery.

“It has been one of the most emotional matches of my tennis career,” admitted Nadal after almost five-and-a-half hours of gruelling tennis that saw him clinch a record-breaking 21st men’s singles Grand Slam title.

Hard road to title 21

The foot injury Nadal suffers from is a rare congenital problem that causes deformation of the scaphoid bone. It’s one the 35-year-old has been managing since childhood, but that flared up again during 2021.

Coming into his 29th Grand Slam final in Melbourne, the Spaniard admitted that he experienced “a lot of days of hard work without seeing a light” during his latest six-month lay-off. He was just as open with his assessment at the Rod Laver Arena in the early hours of Monday morning.

“For me, it’s just amazing,” Nadal told the crowd. “Being honest, one and a half months ago I didn’t know if I’d be able to be back on the tour and today I’m here in front of you with this trophy. You don’t know how hard I fought to get here. Without a doubt this has been one of the most emotional [periods] of my tennis career.”

Record-breaking Rafa

The victory not only marked his second title in Melbourne, a remarkable 13 years after his first, but also saw him move ahead of Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic in the all-time men’s rankings.

Djokovic missed his chance to improve on his nine Australian Open wins when he was deported over vaccination issues on the eve of the tournament. Federer, meanwhile, was injured, but took to Instagram to congratulate Nadal.

“To my friend and great rival Rafael Nadal. Heartfelt congratulations on becoming the first man to win 21 Grand Slam singles titles. A few months ago, we were joking about both being on crutches. Amazing. Never underestimate a great champion. Your incredible work ethic, dedication and fighting spirit are an inspiration to me and countless others around the world.”

In the overall rankings for Grand Slam wins, Nadal still trails Magaret Court (24), Serena Williams (23) and Steffi Graf (22), but still has time to add to his tally providing his body holds up to the rigors of the Tour.

“One and a half months ago I’d probably have said there’s a chance this will be my last Australian Open, but now I have plenty of energy to keep going. I really can’t explain the feelings that I have right now, but I’m going to keep trying my best to come again next year,” he said after his Sunday win.

This article was originally published on DW.

Pegasus Scandal: In Hungary, Journalists Sue State Over Spyware

This is the first legal case brought by Pegasus victims against an EU state.


When Szabolcs Panyi learned, in the spring of 2021, that the Pegasus spy software had been installed on his smartphone, the Hungarian investigative journalist knew it wasn’t just a case of eavesdropping. The software does more than simply intercept phone calls: It can access all of a smartphone’s data, and can even switch on the microphone and camera without being noticed.

“I felt as if they had broken into my apartment and office, bugged everything, put hidden cameras everywhere, and were even following me into the shower,” he said.

Panyi is an editor at the Budapest-based investigative online media outlet Direkt36. He is one of several dozen people who have been monitored — illegally — by the Hungarian state using the Pegasus spyware. Its intended targets are serious criminals or terrorists, and these people were neither. They were monitored because their research or political activities meant they were an inconvenience, or a threat, to the government of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.

Also read: India Bought Pegasus as Part of Larger $2 Billion Deal with Israel in 2017, Claims ‘NYT’ Report

In July 2021, a consortium of international media organisations including The Wire reported on the usage of Pegasus in countries across the world. The network published information about leaked lists of around 50,000 phone numbers that had been targeted and attacked using the Israeli spyware. Some 300 of the targets were based in Hungary, and they included the phones of journalists, lawyers, political activists, entrepreneurs — even a former minister.

Better controls over intelligence services

Now, more than six months after the affair came to light, six of the people targeted in Hungary — including Panyi — are taking legal action. This is the first legal case brought by Pegasus victims against an EU state. They will instigate proceedings in Hungary before the courts and with NAIH, the country’s data protection authority, as well as in Israel, with the attorney general.

The six are being represented by the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU — TASZ in Hungarian), one of Hungary’s main civil rights organisations, and by Israeli lawyer Eitay Mack. On January 28, the HCLU made an initial public announcement to this effect in Budapest, and activated a dedicated page on its website.

“On the one hand, we want those affected to be told what information and data the intelligence services have on them,” HCLU lawyer Adam Remport, who is coordinating the initiative, told DW. “On the other hand, we want to take action against abusive surveillance in general, and obtain better and independent controls over intelligence services in Hungary.”

This is also important to Panyi, in addition to the question of exactly what data was siphoned from his phone. “The current regulations are so elastic and so broadly defined that, in Hungary, anyone can be monitored,” he told DW.

Sale of software went ahead despite concerns

In Israel, attorney Eitay Mack will file a lawsuit with the country’s attorney general against both the manufacturer of the software, a private technology company called NSO Group, and the Israeli Defense Ministry, which has to approve sales of such software to other countries. Mack has already made several attempts to sue over Pegasus — because of the way the software was used in Mexico, among other things — so far, however, without success.

But Mack won’t give up. “Pegasus was sold to the Hungarian state even though there were considerable concerns about the abuse of the rule of law in Hungary,” Mack told DW. “That’s why I want to try and sue the Israeli Defense Ministry for, among other things, failing to prevent a crime, as well as violation of the right to privacy.”

Pegasus in Poland

When the Pegasus affair came to light, Hungary was thought to be the only EU member state where a government had used the spyware against critics. Then, in late 2021, it emerged that the government in Poland, led by the ruling Law and Justice party, had done the same. In both countries, the governments indirectly admitted that they had authorised the use of Pegasus spyware against individuals.

In Hungary, a member of parliament and high-ranking politician from Orban’s right-wing populist Fidesz party inadvertently confirmed to journalists in November 2021 that the country’s Interior Ministry had purchased Pegasus, a statement the Hungarian prosecutor’s office said shortly afterwards was “not in line with the facts.”

Also read: NSO Chairman Quits, Says Departure Unrelated to Recent Scandals

There is, however, little doubt that Orban and former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who have been personal friends for many years, probably agreed the Pegasus deal at a meeting in Budapest in July 2017.

Common enemy: George Soros

Orban and Netanyahu have a common enemy: the American stock market billionaire George Soros, who is of Hungarian Jewish origin, and uses his fortune to promote civil society activities. The two politicians have also helped each other on numerous occasions: Hungary has repeatedly blocked EU resolutions that were critical of Israel, while Netanyahu attested that the Orban government was exemplary in combating antisemitism — despite several government campaigns against Soros in Hungary with strong antisemitic overtones.

“Israel has paid a high price for Hungary’s support: It has covered for the Orban government’s antisemitism,” said Eitay Mack. The lawyer is convinced Pegasus spyware also formed part of the cooperation between Orban and Netanyahu. “This spy software is a tool of Israeli diplomacy.”

A degree of paranoia

Both Mack and Hungarian lawyer Adam Remport are aware that proceedings in their respective countries may take years. Mack said that, nonetheless, he will not let up in his efforts to ensure that Israel is held accountable for exporting weapons, including cyber weapons such as Pegasus, to autocratic countries. And Remport stressed that, if necessary, the HCLU will take things all the way to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. “A ruling from there would have pan-European significance,” he said.

Meanwhile, Panyi and his colleagues from the investigative portal Direkt36 have gone on to uncover fresh cases of the abuse of Pegasus spyware in Hungary in recent months. And it’s not only critics of Orban’s regime who are being targeted.

At the end of December, for example, Direkt36 published information showing that Pegasus had been used to target phones belonging to bodyguards of the Hungarian president, Janos Ader — one of Orban’s longstanding close allies. “When we see that even people in Orban’s inner circle are being spied on now,” said Panyi, “you can’t help but note that there is a degree of paranoia at work, even at the heart of the regime.”

(DW)