In their seminal work How Democracies Die, Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt put it succinctly: democracies die at the hands of elected leaders who subvert the very process that brought them to power. The elected authoritarians slowly, but steadily, weaken the critical institutions like the judiciary and press and the established political norms.
The authoritarians employ ingenious methods to get re-elected with a bigger majority. That will give them not only legitimacy but an aura of invincibility. Of over two dozen global studies on poll rigging, How to Steal an Election in Broad Daylight by Nic Cheeseman and Brian Klaas and How Autocrats can Rig the Game and Damage Democracy by Lucan Ahmad Way and Steven Levitsky stand out.
Levitsky narrates how the ruling parties pack judiciaries, electoral commissions and other independent bodies to ensure that the incumbent will win critical electoral, legal or other disputes. The professors mentioned rigging techniques like gerrymandering, rotten borrows and putting up namesakes to confuse the voters. None of this is new to Indians.
Also read: ‘Repeat of 2019’: EC Turning Blind Eye to BJP’s Rule Breaking, Opposition Parties Allege
Amit Shah’s operation in West Bengal could well offer much more valuable input for political scientists. The home minister’s political aides, BJP’s state prabhari, union ministers assigned to the constituencies, local BJP leaders, the CRPF, and most disturbingly the Election Commission and its observers worked in tandem for four months.
Look at the turn of events:
- EC singled out West Bengal by announcing an eight-phase election spread over five weeks. A furious Mamata Banerjee burst out: “Is Amit Shah running the Election Commission? He is giving instructions to EC. Now EC has removed my security officer on his (Shah’s) instructions.”
- EC ordered the removal of Virendra as the director-general of police and replace him with P. Nirajnayan. The Commission also ordered the transfer of the sub-divisional police officer of Haldia and the circle inspector of Mahishadal in Purba Medinipur. A furious Mamata Banerjee hit out again: “Who is running the Election Commission? Amit Shah, are you running it?”. EC said the cops were removed on recommendations of its special observers Ajay Nayak and Vivek Dube whose very credibility TMC had questioned.
- Sitting in her wheelchair, Mamata alleged Amit Shah was “instructing” Central forces. “This is shameful. The people will give them a befitting reply,” she roared.
- In the midst of the polls, the enforcement directorate probing the Saradha ponzi scam attached assets worth Rs 3 crore of TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh, Satabdi Roy and Debjani Mukherjee. Roy claimed she had returned the money a year ago. The two TMC leaders asked why similar action was not taken against BJP leaders like Mithun Chakraborty. Also, during polls, the CBI grilled Rujira Banerjee, Mamata’s nephew’s wife, in an alleged coal smuggling case.
- “BJP leaders sitting in hotels are distributing huge amounts of money. They are conducting horse-trading,” Mamata alleged and asked. “Where is the Election Commission? Where is their naka checking?” she asked. “The BJP is bringing goons from Bihar, UP to disrupt peace in Bengal.”
- At Nandigram, she alleged inaction by Election Commission. “We have lodged 63 complaints since morning. But no action has been taken. We will move the court. This is unacceptable,” she thundered.
- In a rare concession, the EC reduced its 48-hour campaign ban on Assam BJP leader Himanta Biswa Sarma to 24 hours after he expressed “regret”. Weekly newsmagazine Outlook quoted a critic having questioned the EC for different rules for DMK’s A. Raja and Sarma. Raja too faced a similar ban by the ECI but despite rendering an apology, it was not relaxed.
- The chief election commissioner openly encouraged his special police observer Vivek Dubey who was brought from another state. He thought he could bludgeon the state administration into submission. About 1.30 lakh central armed forces were posted in West Bengal, obviously with the active assistance of Amit Shah. The latter combined his role as home minister as well as the BJP boss.
- We have not heard complaints of large-scale rigging, but from deciding the polling schedule to making and implementing COVID-19 guidelines, the EC has gone out of the way to enable the ruling party at the Centre, says Yogendra Yadav, psephologist and activist.
- After the results came out, Mamata Banerjee alleged if the Election Commission had not ‘rigged’ the polls, BJP would have been reduced to less than 30 seats. She sought electoral reforms to protect the democratic fabric.
Explicitly partisan
Sunil Arora was brought in as chief election commissioner in December 2018, just four months before the Lok Sabha polls. Since then he was seen as an appendage of the ruling elite. It was alleged that he delayed the 2019 Lok Sabha poll rollout up to March 10, 2019 to give enough time for the Prime Minister to complete his inauguration spree. The Supreme Court had to intervene six times to warn Nirvachan Sadan against deviations from the principle of fair play.
In the course of two months in the run-up to the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, as many as 40 serious complaints were filed with the commission by the opposition leaders. Never in the past had the commission received as many as 40,000 complaints from the political parties and candidates. Decisions on some of the opposition complaints were kept pending for over a month.
File photo of Amit Shah and Narendra Modi. Photo: PTI
On April 16, 2019, the Supreme Court threatened to drag the CEC to the court to explain his failure to impose restrictions on hate speech. Two weeks later, on April 29, 2019, the apex court ordered to hear the complaints of non-action by the commission in several specific complaints. That day, Nirvachan Sadan hurriedly called a full meeting of the commission to hear the complaints against Modi and Shah and ‘others like Rahul Gandhi’.
The chief election commissioner’s reputation as an impartial institution suffered because it showed unusual reluctance to take up complaints of the code violation by the Prime Minister. On April 1, 2019, Modi said at Wardha that Rahul Gandhi was contesting from a “safe” constituency “where the majority community is in minority”. The communal undertone was apparent. Yet it took four weeks for the EC to conclude that Modi’s was an “innocent” remark. At Latur on April 9, 2019, Modi made a direct appeal to the first-time voters asking them to dedicate their votes to the Air Force team that struck at Balakot and the martyrs of Pulwama. Nirvachan Sadan held that Modi did not directly appeal for votes in the name of armed forces.
Also read: ECI’s Conduct of 2019 Elections Raises ‘Grave Doubts’ About Its Fairness: Citizens’ Report
As per rules, the campaign in West Bengal was to end at 5 pm on May 17, 2019. The EC issued the unprecedented order on May 16, 2019, afternoon following complaints from the local BJP leaders. What made it all the more strange was that the ban came into effect from 10 am. Why 10 am? As per chief minister Mamata Bannerjee, the revised timing was to facilitate a Modi rally in Bengal which was to end at 10 am that day.
However, Ashok Lavasa, one of the commissioners, did not support the CEC on many of his contentious decisions. Such decisions were taken by a split verdict of two-to-one. This included the clean chit given to Prime Minister on his speeches on April 1, 6 and 9, 2019. For this, Lavasa had to suffer harassment by agencies like the enforcement directorate. Suddenly, his wife, son and sister came under investigation. Finally, in August, 2020, he resigned as election commissioner to join Asian Development Bank.
The Outlook weekly suggested that Sunil Arora may well get a gubernatorial post after retirement. Of late, such quid pro quo has happened in other cases, including that of chief justice of India. That is not the point.
Incumbents like Sunil Arora are offshoots of what the GroundTruth Project calls authoritarian’s playbook. Democracy Undone: The Authoritarian Playbook is a study chronicling techniques used by seven populist authoritarians, including Narendra Modi. Undermining institutions is top on the populist agenda. The other six are to rewrite history, target outsiders, exploit religion, weaponise fear, divide and conquer and erode truth.
P. Raman covered politics for national dailies since 1978 and is the author of Strong Leader Populism: How Modi’s Hybrid Regime Model Reshaping Political Narrative, Ecosystem and Symbols.